Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Interface-directed design of glycidyl methacrylate-functionalized UiO-66 for thin film nanofiltration membranes in heavy metals rejection
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 17 February 2026

Interface-directed design of glycidyl methacrylate-functionalized UiO-66 for thin film nanofiltration membranes in heavy metals rejection

  • Irfan Yousaf1,
  • Noaman Ul Haq1,
  • Mehwish Batool1,
  • Aftab Ahmad Khan2,
  • Mohammad Anwar Parvez3 &
  • …
  • Md Arifuzzaman2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 353 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Chemistry
  • Engineering
  • Environmental sciences
  • Materials science
  • Nanoscience and technology

Abstract

Thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes incorporating metal organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted considerable interest for heavy metal separation; however, their performance is often limited by poor filler–polymer compatibility and non-selective interfacial defects. In this study, an interface-engineered TFN membrane is developed by incorporating glycidyl methacrylate–functionalized UiO-66-NH₂ (GMA-UiO-66) into a polyamide selective layer formed via interfacial polymerization. GMA functionalization is employed to improve filler integration within the polyamide matrix through enhanced interfacial interactions, rather than to increase intrinsic porosity or surface hydrophilicity. Comprehensive characterization (XRD, FTIR, BET, SEM) confirms that GMA modification preserves UiO-66 crystallinity while inducing modest reductions in accessible surface area and membrane porosity, accompanied by a slight increase in contact angle due to altered surface chemistry. Cross-sectional SEM analysis reveals a well-defined polyamide active layer with improved morphological continuity in GMA-UiO-66-based TFN membranes relative to membranes containing unmodified UiO-66-NH₂. Under dead-end nanofiltration conditions (6 bar, 50 mg L⁻1 model solutions), the optimized GMA-UiO-66 TFN membrane exhibits rejection values of 97% for Pb2⁺ and 93% for arsenate, alongside stable water flux compared with the control polyamide membrane as compared to optimized UiO-66-NH2 TFN membrane & pristine TFC membrane which showed lower rejections (94% for Pb(II) and 92% for As(V)) and (75% for Pb(II) and 70% for As(V)) respectively. These rejection levels are achieved under feed concentrations substantially higher than typical drinking-water levels, highlighting the membrane’s capability to significantly reduce heavy metal loads under challenging conditions. Comparative analysis with recently reported MOF-based TFN and nanofiltration membranes demonstrates that the observed performance is competitive within the context of single-pass nanofiltration pretreatment. This work positions GMA-functionalized UiO-66 as a design platform for interface engineering in TFN membranes, offering insights into how organic monomer modification of MOF fillers influences membrane structure–performance relationships. The findings provide a mechanistic foundation for future studies targeting long-term stability, fouling resistance, and multi-stage treatment integration for practical heavy-metal removal applications.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Boretti, A. & Rosa, L. Reassessing the projections of the World Water Development Report. NPJ Clean Water 2, 15 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kurniawan, T. A., Chan, G. Y. S., Lo, W. H. & Babel, S. Physico-chemical treatment techniques for wastewater laden with heavy metals. Chem. Eng. J. 118, 83–98 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fu, F. & Wang, Q. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 92, 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. Lead Fact Sheet. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/lead-poisoning-and-health (2025).

  5. U.S Environmental Protection Agency. Lead Fact Sheet. https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/basic-information-about-lead-drinking-water.

  6. World Health Organization. Arsenic Fact Sheet. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/arsenic (2025).

  7. Flora, G., Gupta, D. & Tiwari, A. Toxicity of lead: A review with recent updates. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 5, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10102-012-0009-2 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zaimee, M. Z. A., Sarjadi, M. S. & Rahman, M. L. Heavy metals removal from water by efficient adsorbents. Water 13, 2659. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192659 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Razzak, S. A. et al. A comprehensive review on conventional and biological-driven heavy metals removal from industrial wastewater. Environ. Adv. 7, 100168 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. He, Y., Tang, Y. P., Ma, D. & Chung, T. S. UiO-66 incorporated thin-film nanocomposite membranes for efficient selenium and arsenic removal. J Memb Sci 541, 262–270 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sahar, T. et al. Tailoring thin film composite membranes for enhanced removal of heavy metals from water. J Appl Polym Sci 141, (2024).

  12. Polyethersulfone-based membranes embedded with nanoparticles for wastewater treatment J. Appl. Polym. Sci. e56295 (2024)

  13. Abdullah, N. et al. Removal of lead(II) by nanofiltration-ranged thin film nanocomposite membrane incorporated UiO-66-NH2: Comparative removal performance between hydraulic-driven and osmotic-driven membrane process. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 128, 354–369 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Werber, J. R., Osuji, C. O. & Elimelech, M. Materials for next-generation desalination and water purification membranes. Nat Rev Mater 1, 16018 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lau, W. J. et al. A review on polyamide thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes: History, applications, challenges and approaches. Water Res. 80, 306–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.037 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jeong, B. H. et al. Interfacial polymerization of thin film nanocomposites: A new concept for reverse osmosis membranes. J Memb Sci 294, 1–7 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yin, J., Zhu, G. & Deng, B. Graphene oxide (GO) enhanced polyamide (PA) thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membrane for water purification. Desalination 379, 93–101 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lind, M. L. et al. Influence of zeolite crystal size on zeolite-polyamide thin film nanocomposite membranes. Langmuir 25, 10139–10145 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wu, H., Sun, H., Hong, W., Mao, L. & Liu, Y. Improvement of polyamide thin film nanocomposite membrane assisted by tannic acid-feiii functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9, 32255–32263 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. He, M. et al. Novel polydopamine/metal organic framework thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane for salt rejection and heavy metal removal. Chem. Eng. J. 389, 124452 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zeggai, F. zohra, Ait-Touchente, Z., Bachari, K. & Elaissari, A. Investigation of Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs): Synthesis, Properties, and Applications - An In-Depth Review. Chem. Phys. Impact (2025)

  22. Alhoshan, M., Alam, J., Shukla, A. K. & Hamid, A. A. Polyphenylsulfone membrane blended with polyaniline for nanofiltration promising for removing heavy metals (Cd2+/Pb2+) from wastewater. J. Market. Res. 24, 6034–6047 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Van Goethem, C. et al. The role of MOFs in Thin-Film Nanocomposite (TFN) membranes. J Memb Sci 563, 938–948 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmadijokani, F. et al. UiO-66 metal–organic frameworks in water treatment: A critical review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 125, 100904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100904 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Alhoshan, M., Shukla, A. K. & Alam, J. Preparation of Zn–metal organic framework–based poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoro-propylene) ultrafiltration membrane with improved antifouling properties. Water Air Soil Pollut 234, 448 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ma, D., Peh, S. B., Han, G. & Chen, S. B. Thin-Film Nanocomposite (TFN) membranes incorporated with super-hydrophilic metal-organic framework (MOF) UiO-66: Toward enhancement of water flux and salt rejection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9, 7523–7534 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shukla, A. K., Alam, J., Ali, F. A. A. & Alhoshan, M. A highly permeable zinc-based MOF/polyphenylsulfone composite membrane with elevated antifouling properties. Chem. Commun. 56, 5231–5234 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ali, F. A. A. et al. A novel approach to optimize the fabrication conditions of thin film composite ro membranes using multi-objective genetic algorithm II. Polymers (Basel) 12, 494 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ahmed Ali, F. A. et al. Graphene oxide-silver nanosheet-incorporated polyamide thin-film composite membranes for antifouling and antibacterial action against Escherichia coli and bovine serum albumin. J. Industrial Eng. Chem. 80, 227–238 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shukla, A. K. et al. Thin-film nanocomposite membrane incorporated with porous Zn-based metal-organic frameworks: Toward enhancement of desalination performance and chlorine resistance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 28818–28831 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shukla, A. K., Alam, J., Mishra, U. & Alhoshan, M. A sustainable approach for the removal of pharmaceutical contaminants from effluent using polyamide thin-film composite membranes integrated with Zn-based metal organic frameworks. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 110104–110118 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shukla, A. K., Alam, J., Mishra, U. & Kesari, K. K. Investigating the efficiency of a ceramic-based thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane for dyes removal. Ceram Int 49, 37670–37679 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Molavi, H., Eskandari, A., Shojaei, A. & Mousavi, S. A. Enhancing CO2/N2 adsorption selectivity via post-synthetic modification of NH2-UiO-66(Zr). Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 257, 193–201 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Liu, C. et al. Synthesis, characterization and ceramization of a carbon-rich zirconium-containing precursor for ZrC ceramic. Ceram Int 40, 7285–7292 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Oh, S. Y., Yoo, D. I., Shin, Y. & Seo, G. FTIR analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide. Carbohydr Res 340, 417–428 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Saeed, F., Anil Reddy, K. & Sridhar, S. Efficient removal of environmentally hazardous heavy metal ions from water by NH2-MIL-101-Fe and MOF-808-EDTA based polyether sulfone adsorbents. Chem. Eng. J. 497, 154688 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mkilima, T. et al. Electrospun MIL-101(Fe)/graphene oxide nanofibrous composites for efficient removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Water Environ. Res. 97, e70105 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Eghbalazar, T., Shakeri, A. & Abbasi, A. Novel thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane embedded with amine functionalized uio-66 metal organic frameworks as an effective way to remove heavy metal cr3+ ions. Desalination Water Treat 220, 211–220 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ali, Z. et al. Fabrication of novel (Cr) based (MIL-101) incorporated mixed matrix forward osmosis membranes for environmental remediation. Mater Chem Phys 315, 128951 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gul, S. et al. Microscopic techniques for fabrication of polyethersulfone thin-film nanocomposite membranes intercalated with UiO-66-SO3H for heavy metal ions removal from water. Microsc Res Tech 85, 1289–1299 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Aghili, F., Ghoreyshi, A. A., Van der Bruggen, B. & Rahimpour, A. A highly permeable UiO-66-NH2/polyethyleneimine thin-film nanocomposite membrane for recovery of valuable metal ions from brackish water. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 151, 244–256 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Liu, L. et al. Thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membrane incorporated with UiO-66 nanoparticles for enhanced boron removal. J Memb Sci 580, 101–109 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wu, Z. et al. Polyamide/UiO-66-NH2 nanocomposite membranes by polyphenol interfacial engineering for molybdenum(VI) removal. Desalination 563, 116716 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Miwornunyuie, N. et al. Application of ZIF-8 nanocomposite membrane in microbial desalination cells for simultaneous heavy metal removal and biofouling prevention. Chemosphere 306, 135386 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gozali Balkanloo, P., Poursattar Marjani, A. & Mahmoudian, M. Fabrication, characterization, and performance evaluation of polysulfone nanocomposite membranes containing different sizes of ZIF-8 to desalination and heavy metals removal from wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 496, 153835 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to King Faisal University for its support in providing conducive research and a learning environment, which facilitated the successful completion of this research work.

Funding

This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia [Grant No. KFU254005].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Irfan Yousaf, Noaman Ul Haq & Mehwish Batool

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University, 31982, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia

    Aftab Ahmad Khan & Md Arifuzzaman

  3. Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University, 31982, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia

    Mohammad Anwar Parvez

Authors
  1. Irfan Yousaf
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Noaman Ul Haq
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mehwish Batool
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aftab Ahmad Khan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mohammad Anwar Parvez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Md Arifuzzaman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

I.Y h wrote the original draft, I.Y and M.B contributed in methodology, investigation, data curation, N.H conceptualized, supervised, and revised, N.H and M.B contributed in reviewing, A.A.K was responsible for funding acquisition, project administration, validation, M.A.Z and M.A.P contributed in revising, and formal analysis.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Noaman Ul Haq or Aftab Ahmad Khan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yousaf, I., Haq, N.U., Batool, M. et al. Interface-directed design of glycidyl methacrylate-functionalized UiO-66 for thin film nanofiltration membranes in heavy metals rejection. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39047-9

Download citation

  • Received: 13 November 2025

  • Accepted: 02 February 2026

  • Published: 17 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39047-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Polyamide nanocomposites
  • MOF–polymer interfaces
  • Interfacial polymerization
  • Polyamide layer
  • TFN membranes
  • GMA–UiO-66
  • Heavy metal removal
  • Nanofiltration
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing