Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Automated cone photoreceptor detection using synthetic data and deep learning in confocal adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope images
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 11 February 2026

Automated cone photoreceptor detection using synthetic data and deep learning in confocal adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope images

  • Mital Shah1,2,
  • Laura K. Young4,
  • Susan M. Downes1,2,
  • Hannah E. Smithson3 &
  • …
  • Ana I. L. Namburete5 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 550 Accesses

  • 2 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Mathematics and computing
  • Medical research

Abstract

Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) imaging enables the cone photoreceptor mosaic to be visualised in the living human eye. Performing quantitative analysis of these images requires identification of individual photoreceptors. This is typically performed by manual labelling, which is subjective, time consuming and not feasible on a large scale. Automated algorithms to replace manual labelling are required and deep learning-based methods provide an effective way of achieving this. However, this approach requires large volumes of annotated training data that are difficult to acquire. Synthetic data may help to bridge this lack of annotated training data. A U-Net configuration was trained using a large synthetic dataset of confocal AOSLO images generated using ERICA alongside a smaller dataset of real confocal AOSLO images (Milwaukee dataset). Model performance was assessed by calculating the Dice coefficient, a metric quantifying segmentation overlap, on both a real held-out test set and an independent real dataset (Oxford dataset). Results from this evaluation were benchmarked against expert labelling and two automated cone detection methods: a confocal convolutional neural network (CNN) (1), and a combined graph-theory and dynamic programming approach (2)). The mean Dice coefficient compared to manual labelling was 0.989 (U-Net), 0.989 (confocal CNN), and 0.985 (graph-theory and dynamic programming) on the held-out test set. On the independent Oxford dataset, the U-Net achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 0.962 compared to manual labelling. Results show performance that is comparable to the gold standard of manual labelling and two automated cone detection methods. Furthermore, we demonstrate generalisability of this approach on an independent real dataset with images from higher retinal eccentricities. This approach may be useful for quantitative analysis of the photoreceptor mosaic in patients with retinal disease to provide cell-specific imaging biomarkers from AOSLO images.

Similar content being viewed by others

Emulated retinal image capture (ERICA) to test, train and validate processing of retinal images

Article Open access 27 May 2021

Neural network assisted annotation and analysis tool to study in-vivo foveolar cone photoreceptor topography

Article Open access 04 July 2025

Morphology of the normative human cone photoreceptor mosaic and a publicly available adaptive optics montage repository

Article Open access 05 October 2024

Data availability

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are available in the following GitHub repositories, https://github.com/DavidCunefare/CNN-Cone-Detection/tree/master/Images and Results/Confocal as cited by Cunefare et al.1 and https://github.com/LauraKateYoung/ERICA as cited by Young et al.11.

Abbreviations

AOSLO:

Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope

CNN:

Convolutional neural network

C-CNN:

Confocal CNN

ERICA:

Emulated Retinal Image CApture

FN:

False negatives

FP:

False positives

GTDP:

Graph-theory and dynamic programming

nW:

Nanowatts

SNR:

Signal-to-noise ratio

TP:

True positives

References

  1. Cunefare, D. et al. Open source software for automatic detection of cone photoreceptors in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy using convolutional neural networks. Sci Rep. 7(1), 1–11 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chiu, S. J. et al. Automatic cone photoreceptor segmentation using graph theory and dynamic programming. Biomed. Opt Express. 4(6), 924 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li, K. Y. & Roorda, A. Automated identification of cone photoreceptors in adaptive optics retinal images. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 24(5), 1358 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Xue, B., Choi, S. S., Doble, N. & Werner, J. S. Photoreceptor counting and montaging of en-face retinal images from an adaptive optics fundus camera. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 24(5), 1364 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bukowska, D. M. et al. Semi-automated identification of cones in the human retina using circle Hough transform. Biomed Opt. Express. 6(12), 4676 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper, R. F., Langlo, C. S., Dubra, A. & Carroll, J. Automatic detection of modal spacing (Yellott’s ring) in adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope images. Ophthal. Physiol Opt. 33(4), 540–549 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cunefare, D. et al. Automatic detection of cone photoreceptors in split detector adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope images. Biomed. Opt Express. 7(5), 2036 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bergeles, C. et al. Unsupervised identification of cone photoreceptors in non-confocal adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope images. Biomed. Opt Express. 8(6), 3081 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mariotti, L. & Devaney, N. Performance analysis of cone detection algorithms. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 32(4), 497–506 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. & Brox, T. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser Lect Notes Artif Intell Lect Notes Bioinformatics). 9351, 234–241 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Young, L. K. & Smithson, H. E. Emulated retinal image capture (ERICA) to test, train and validate processing of retinal images. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 11225 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Young, L. K., Morris, T. J., Saunter, C. D. & Smithson, H. E. Compact, modular and in-plane AOSLO for high-resolution retinal imaging. Biomed. Opt. Express. 9(9), 4275 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jarosz, J. et al. High temporal resolution aberrometry in a 50-eye population and implications for adaptive optics error budget. Biomed. Opt. Express. 8(4), 2088 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chollet F et al. Keras. 2015.

  15. Abadi M, Agarwal A, Barham P, Brevdo E, Chen Z, Citro C, Corrado GS, Davis A, Dean J, Devin M, et al. TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems. 2016;

  16. Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, Sermanet P, Reed S, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Vanhoucke V, Rabinovich A. Going deeper with convolutions. Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. 2015;07–12-June:1–9.

  17. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. 2016;2016-Decem:770–8.

  18. Kingma DP, Ba JL. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. 3rd Int Conf Learn Represent ICLR 2015 - Conf Track Proc. 2015;1–15.

  19. J Hamwood D Alonso-caneiro DM Sampson MJ Collins FK Chen 2019 Automatic Detection of Cone Photoreceptors With Fully Convolutional Networks. 8 6 1 8

  20. Tanna, P. et al. Reliability and repeatability of cone density measurements in patients with stargardt disease and RPGR-associated retinopathy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 58(9), 3608–3615 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, B. S. et al. The reliability of parafoveal cone density measurements. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 98(8), 1126–1131 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded in whole, or in part, by the Wellcome Trust 105605/Z/14/Z, Fight For Sight 1467/8, the University of Oxford Medical Research Fund MRF/LSV2015/2161, the EPA Cephalosporin Fund CF 277, and the John Fell Oxford University Press Research Fund 103/786 and 151/139. L.K.Y is supported by a UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship (MR/T042192/1) and by a Reece Foundation Fellowship in Translational Systems Neuroscience (Newcastle University). For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oxford Eye Hospital, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK

    Mital Shah & Susan M. Downes

  2. Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Level 6 John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK

    Mital Shah & Susan M. Downes

  3. Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK

    Hannah E. Smithson

  4. Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, NE2 4HH, UK

    Laura K. Young

  5. Oxford Machine Learning in NeuroImaging (OMNI) Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QG, UK

    Ana I. L. Namburete

Authors
  1. Mital Shah
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura K. Young
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Susan M. Downes
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hannah E. Smithson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ana I. L. Namburete
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.S. and L.K.Y conceptualisation and acquisition of data. M.S. creation of new software used in the work and drafting the manuscript. M.S., L.K.Y., H.E.S., and A.I.L.N. analysis and interpretation. L.K.Y., S.M.D., H.E.S., and A.I.L.N. supervision. All authors substantively revised, read, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mital Shah.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shah, M., Young, L.K., Downes, S.M. et al. Automated cone photoreceptor detection using synthetic data and deep learning in confocal adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope images. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39570-9

Download citation

  • Received: 13 May 2025

  • Accepted: 05 February 2026

  • Published: 11 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39570-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope
  • Cone photoreceptor
  • Deep learning
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Convolutional neural network
  • Synthetic data
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics