Table 9 Analyst reputation.

From: Consequences of firm-specific stock price crashes on analyst forecasts: Evidence from China

 

(1)

(2)

 

Star

Non-star

 

FERROR

FERROR

CRASH

5.957**

−0.606

 

(2.748)

(1.056)

POST

0.007

0.073**

 

(0.086)

(0.032)

CRASH*POST

−0.157

−0.187***

 

(0.117)

(0.041)

SIZE

−0.681

−0.422

 

(0.794)

(0.331)

LEV

−1.246

−0.604

 

(2.079)

(0.652)

ROA

−15.907***

−16.043***

 

(5.200)

(2.419)

INBOARD

0.467

0.390

 

(1.195)

(0.419)

INDENP

−6.012

0.967

 

(6.263)

(1.402)

SHRCR

−0.019

0.010

 

(0.031)

(0.013)

INST

−1.998***

−0.474

 

(0.738)

(0.295)

AUDITFEE

0.165

0.090

 

(0.233)

(0.118)

SOE

−0.809**

−0.388

 

(0.323)

(0.569)

COMMITTEE

−2.014*

0.277

 

(1.071)

(0.260)

BIG4

−0.938***

−0.004

 

(0.293)

(0.240)

EXP

−0.013

−0.001

 

(0.014)

(0.001)

HORIZON

0.057***

0.060***

 

(0.011)

(0.005)

SPECIFIC

−0.004

0.000

 

(0.009)

(0.002)

TFOLLOWING

−0.001

−0.000

 

(0.001)

(0.000)

BSIZE

−0.030*

−0.010**

 

(0.016)

(0.005)

TEAM

−0.103

−0.023**

 

(0.085)

(0.010)

_cons

16.654

9.326

 

(17.150)

(7.945)

N

3863

52974

R2

0.767

0.650

Year

Yes

Yes

Match

Yes

Yes

  1. Table 9 shows the results of the analyst reputation for additional analysis. Columns 1 and 2 are grouped according to star analyst. The regression includes year and matched-pair fixed effects. The sample covers the company-month-analyst data of non-missing values of all variables during the period 2001–2020. Robust t-statistics corrected for firm clustering are reported in parentheses. *, ** and *** indicate statistical significance at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels, respectively. All variables are defined in Appendix A.