Table 5 House prices and innovation: first-stage regression results of instrumental variables.

From: Spatial heterogeneity analysis of biased land resource supply policies on housing prices and innovation efficiency

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

 

Entire Country

Eastern Region

Midwestern Region

 

\({Hou\_price}\)

\({Hou\_price}\)

\({Hou\_price}\)

\({Land\_supply}\)

−0.1300*** (0.0165)

−0.1476*** (0.0278)

−0.0792*** (0.0207)

\({Per\_gdp}\)

0.4530*** (0.0247)

0.4066*** (0.0443)

0.4938*** (0.0322)

\({Hum\_capital}\)

−0.0959*** (0.0333)

−0.2626*** (0.0567)

−0.0132 (0.0408)

\({Ind}{\_structure}\)

−0.3408*** (0.0338)

−0.3782*** (0.0732)

−0.2426*** (0.0374)

\({Imp\_}{volume}\)

0.0532*** (0.0148)

−0.0143 (0.0296)

−0.0156 (0.0188)

\(Ex{p\_}{volume}\)

0.0356** (0.0165)

0.0417 (0.0319)

0.0688*** (0.0212)

\({Tax\_revenue}\)

0.1349*** (0.0234)

0.2504*** (0.0446)

0.0918*** (0.0267)

\(C{onstant}\)

2.3112*** (0.1647)

2.7945*** (0.4009)

2.1365*** (0.1676)

Province and Region Fixed Effects

control

control

control

Year Fixed Effect

control

control

control

Number of obs

465

165

300

R2

0.9092

0.9288

0.8513

One Stage F Value

772.74

391.20

320.00

  1. The values in brackets below the coefficient are standard errors, ***indicates significant at the 1% level, **indicates significant at the 5% level.