Table 7 Housing prices and innovation: the results of the second stage regression of instrumental variables after replacing the explained variables.

From: Spatial heterogeneity analysis of biased land resource supply policies on housing prices and innovation efficiency

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

 

Entire Country

Eastern Region

Midwestern Region

 

\({Inn\_efficiency}\)

\({Inn\_efficiency}\)

\({Inn\_efficiency}\)

\({Hou\_price}\)

−0.2622** (0.1178)

−0.3290** (0.1714)

−0.2563* (0.2089)

\({Per\_gdp}\)

−0.2021*** (0.0605)

0.0585 (0.0900)

0.1483 (0.1059)

\({Hum\_capital}\)

0.0215 (0.0380)

−0.0779 (0.0996)

0.1968*** (0.0310)

\({Ind}{\_structure}\)

0.0640 (0.0619)

−0.2359** (0.1199)

0.0137 (0.0604)

\({Imp\_}{volume}\)

0.0972*** (0.0162)

0.2818*** (0.0317)

−0.0253** (0.0132)

\(Ex{p\_}{volume}\)

0.1027*** (0.0127)

0.0727** (0.0323)

0.0675*** (0.0209)

\({Tax\_revenue}\)

−0.0922*** (0.0243)

−0.0840* (0.0586)

−0.0522*** (0.0205)

\({Constant}\)

1.6721*** (0.2878)

2.3289*** (0.5001)

3.2025*** (0.4836)

Province and Region Fixed Effects

control

control

control

Year Fixed Effect

control

control

control

Number of obs

465

165

300

R2

0.7092

0.7338

0.5215

  1. The values in brackets below the coefficient are standard errors, ***indi-cates significant at the 1% level, **indicates significant at the 5% level, and *indicates significant at the 10% level.