Table 7 The heterogeneity analysis in average treatment effect of the treatment group.

From: Exploring the income impact of rural e-commerce comprehensive demonstration project and determinants of county selection

Log (rural resident’s net income)

Mean outcome

ATT

Change(%)

 

In NRECDP

Not in NRECDP

(1) 8 ethnic regions

9.101 (0.007)

8.971 (0.007)

0.130*** (0.010)

13.88%

(2) Non-ethnic regions

9.213 (0.007)

8.988 (0.008)

0.225*** (0.079)

25.23%

(3) Central regions

9.116 (0.100)

8.908 (0.100)

0.208*** (0.014)

23.12%

(4) Western regions

9.143 (0.005)

9.031 (0.006)

0.112*** (0.08)

11.85%

(5) Lower level of industry structure regions

9.104 (0.008)

8.978 (0.009)

0.126*** (0.012)

13.43%

(6) Higher level of industry structure regions

9.196 (0.009)

9.061 (0.102)

0.135*** (0.152)

14.45%

(7) Non-three regions and three prefectures

9.161 (0.005)

9.083 (0.007)

0.078 (0.009)

8.11%

(8) Three regions and three prefectures

9.041 (0.015)

8.719 (0.028)

0.322 (0.031)

37.98%

  1. 1. Standard error is reported in parentheses. 2. *; **; *** represent that the significant level below 10%, 5%, 1%, respectively. 3. The change is calculated by ((2.718^0.130)-1) *100% = 13.88%;
  2. ((2.718^0.225)-1) *100% = 25.23%; ((2.718^0.208)-1) *100% = 23.12%; ((2.718^0.112)-1) *100% = 11.85%; ((2.718^0.126)-1) *100% = 13.43%; ((2.718^0.135)-1) *100% = 14.45%; ((2.718^0.078)-1) *100% = 8.11%; ((2.718^0.322)-1) *100% = 37.98%.
Back to article page