Table 5 The profit relationship of M1 (M2) in different scenarios.
pe < pe0 | \({m}_{0}^{h} \,< \,m\le {m}_{2}\) | m2 < m ≤ m1 | m > m1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Â | \({\pi }_{1H}^{DD\ast }\, > \,{\pi }_{1H}^{ND\ast }\), \({\pi }_{1H}^{DN\ast }\, > \,{\pi }_{1}^{NN\ast }\) \({\pi }_{2H}^{DD\ast } \,> \,{\pi }_{2H}^{DN\ast }\), \({\pi }_{2H}^{ND\ast }\, > \,{\pi }_{2}^{NN\ast }\) | \({\pi }_{1H}^{DD\ast }\, > \,{\pi }_{1L}^{ND\ast }\), \({\pi }_{1L}^{DN\ast }\, > \,{\pi }_{1}^{NN\ast }\) \({\pi }_{2H}^{DD\ast } \,> \,{\pi }_{2L}^{DN\ast }\), \({\pi }_{2L}^{ND\ast } \,> \,{\pi }_{2}^{NN\ast }\) | \({\pi }_{1L}^{DD\ast }\, > \,{\pi }_{1L}^{ND\ast }\), \({\pi }_{1L}^{DN\ast }\, > \,{\pi }_{1}^{NN\ast }\) \({\pi }_{2L}^{DD\ast }\, > \,{\pi }_{2L}^{DN\ast }\), \({\pi }_{2L}^{ND\ast } \,> \,{\pi }_{2}^{NN\ast }\) |
pe > pe0 | \({m}_{0}^{l}\, < \,m\le {m}_{1}\) | \({m}_{1} \,< \,m\le {m}_{2}\) | m > m2 |
| Â | \({\pi }_{1H}^{DD\ast } \,>\, {\pi }_{1H}^{ND\ast }\), \({\pi }_{1H}^{DN\ast } \,> \,{\pi }_{1}^{NN\ast }\) \({\pi }_{2H}^{DD\ast } \,> \,{\pi }_{2H}^{DN\ast }\), \({\pi }_{2H}^{ND\ast } \,> \,{\pi }_{2}^{NN\ast }\) | \({\pi }_{1H}^{DD\ast }\, > \,{\pi }_{1L}^{ND\ast }\), \({\pi }_{1L}^{DN\ast }\, > \,{\pi }_{1}^{NN\ast }\) \({\pi }_{2H}^{DD\ast } \,> \,{\pi }_{2L}^{DN\ast }\), \({\pi }_{2L}^{ND\ast }\, > \,{\pi }_{2}^{NN\ast }\) | \({\pi }_{1L}^{DD\ast }\, > \,{\pi }_{1L}^{ND\ast }\), \({\pi }_{1L}^{DN\ast }\, > \,{\pi }_{1}^{NN\ast }\) \({\pi }_{2L}^{DD\ast } \,> \,{\pi }_{2L}^{DN\ast }\), \({\pi }_{2L}^{ND\ast }\, > \,{\pi }_{2}^{NN\ast }\) |
