Table 7 Measurement invariance testing results using MICOM (male vs. female).

From: Convenient or risky? Investigating the behavioral intention to use facial recognition payment in smart hospitals

Constructs

Step 1

Step 2

 

Step 3 (a)

Step 3 (b)

Full measurement invariance

 

Configurational invariance

Correlation c-value

5% quantile of Cu

Compositional invariance

Difference in the composite variance ratio

95% confidence interval

Difference in the composite variance ratio

95% confidence interval

 

PE

Yes

0.995

0.992

Yes

0.122

−0.141, 0.139

−0.099

−0.202, 0.191

No/Yes

EE

Yes

1.000

0.998

Yes

0.038

−0.143, 0.138

0.005

−0.152, 0.168

Yes/Yes

SI

Yes

0.999

0.998

Yes

0.090

−0.141, 0.136

0.018

−0.182, 0.192

Yes/Yes

FC

Yes

0.999

0.997

Yes

0.146

−0.148, 0.138

−0.007

−0.177, 0.165

No/Yes

PC

Yes

0.999

0.994

Yes

−0.107

−0.136, 0.133

0.001

−0.152, 0.160

Yes/Yes

PR

Yes

0.999

0.998

Yes

−0.118

−0.147, 0.130

−0.048

−0.162, 0.148

Yes/Yes

FA

Yes

1.000

0.999

Yes

0.006

−0.142, 0.134

−0.076

−0.201, 0.198

Yes/Yes

TIF

Yes

0.999

0.999

Yes

0.078

−0.143, 0.135

0.001

−0.142, 0.158

Yes/Yes

PI

Yes

0.999

0.996

Yes

0.094

−0.148, 0.140

0.046

−0.170, 0.168

Yes/Yes

BI

Yes

1.000

0.998

Yes

0.150

−0.154, 0.140

0.063

−0.164, 0.190

No/Yes