Table 8 Multi-group analysis results.

H	Relationship	Path coefficient				P-values		Confidence interval (95%)				Path coefficient differences	P-value difference		Supported
H	Relationship	Male	Female	Male	Female	Male	Female	Male		Female		Path coefficient differences	Permutation	Henseler’s MGA	Supported
H1	PE → BI	0.136	0.135	3.379	3.866	0.001**	0.000***	0.058	0.216	0.062	0.200	0.001	0.984	0.981	No/No
H2	EE → BI	0.162	0.154	2.862	2.964	0.004**	0.003**	0.049	0.269	0.048	0.252	0.008	0.928	0.918	No/No
H3	SI → BI	0.130	0.259	2.495	4.817	0.013*	0.000***	0.025	0.229	0.156	0.368	-0.129	0.095	0.085	No/No
H4	FC → BI	0.232	0.165	4.253	3.116	0.000***	0.002**	0.119	0.337	0.060	0.268	0.067	0.411	0.379	No/No
H5	PC → TIF	−0.358	−0.209	7.126	4.196	0.000***	0.000***	−0.453	−0.254	−0.302	−0.106	−0.149	0.036	0.035	Yes/Yes
H6	PR → TIF	−0.080	−0.156	1.617	3.279	0.106	0.001**	−0.180	0.017	−0.250	−0.062	0.076	0.273	0.268	No/No
H7	FA → TIF	0.287	0.261	6.280	5.005	0.000***	0.000***	0.195	0.376	0.159	0.362	0.026	0.716	0.709	No/No
H8	TIF → BI	0.180	0.160	3.361	3.498	0.001**	0.000***	0.080	0.293	0.071	0.249	0.021	0.777	0.776	No/No
H9	PI → BI	0.128	0.066	2.528	1.398	0.012*	0.162	0.027	0.226	−0.030	0.157	0.062	0.403	0.372	No/No
H10	PI*TIF → BI	0.060	0.087	1.385	2.174	0.166	0.030*	−0.023	0.148	0.009	0.167	−0.027	0.650	0.648	No/No

A P-value below 0.05 or above 0.95 suggests significant differences (at the 5% level) in specific path coefficients across the two groups for Henseler’s MGA method.
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Quick links

Search