Table 25 Results of the PSM matching equilibrium test.

From: The impact of common institutional ownership on green innovation of China’s energy firms

Variable

Unmatched

Mean

%reduct

t-test

V(T)/V(C)

Matched

Treated

Control

%bias

|bias | 

t

p > |t | 

L.Size

U

8.4882

7.8970

51.3

92.9

4.88

0.000

0.43*

M

8.4958

8.5376

−3.6

−0.28

0.783

0.38*

L.Age

U

2.8815

2.8014

24.1

55.0

2.45

0.014

0.88

M

2.8784

2.8423

10.8

0.86

0.389

0.66*

L.Lev

U

0.5453

0.4590

51.2

93.2

5.28

0.000

0.70*

M

0.5477

0.8377

3.5

0.30

0.746

0.92

L.Cashflow

U

0.0771

0.0499

49.7

66.3

4.97

0.000

0.59*

M

0.0746

0.0838

−16.7

−1.47

0.141

0.70*

L.Growth

U

0.1362

0.1711

−9.8

−103.5

−1.02

0.307

0.75*

M

0.1256

0.1966

−19.9

−1.64

0.102

0.67

L.Dual

U

0.0465

0.2301

−55.1

95.7

−4.92

0.000

.

M

0.0476

0.0397

2.4

0.31

0.759

.

L.Indep

U

0.3893

0.3680

36.4

73.1

4.49

0.000

1.52*

M

0.3849

0.3792

9.8

0.79

0.432

1.04

L.Board

U

2.2022

2.1862

6.9

−35.0

0.84

0.401

1.46*

M

2.2083

2.2299

−9.3

−0.71

0.478

1.22

Sample

Ps R2

LR chi2

P > chi2

Unmatched

0.099

105.09

0.000

Matched

0.018

6.17

0.628

  1. *, **, *** indicate that the parameters are significant at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively.