Table 3 Retrospective validation of digital twin predicted responses
Trial | Tested regimens | Digital twin predicted pCR rate | Trial observation |
---|---|---|---|
INT C9741 | conventional regimen: 4 cycles of A (60 mg/m2) + C (600 mg/m2) every 3 weeks → 4 cycles of T (175 mg/m2) every 3 weeks | 49.52% | Dose-dense regimen led to significant better outcome |
dose-dense regimen: 4 cycles of A (60 mg/m2) + C (600 mg/m2) every 2 weeks → 4 cycles of T (175 mg/m2) every 2 weeks | 73.33%a | ||
ECOG 1199 + | Tri-weekly Taxol: 4 cycles of A (60 mg/m2) + C (600 mg/m2) every 3 weeks → 4 cycles of T (175 mg/m2) every 3 weeks | 49.52% | Weekly and bi-weekly Taxol provided similar outcomes that were superior tri-weekly Taxol |
weekly Taxol: 4 cycles of A (60 mg/m2) + C (600 mg/m2) every 3 weeks → 12 cycles of T (80 mg/m2) weekly | 55.24% | ||
Bi-weekly Taxol: 4 cycles of A (60 mg/m2) + C (600 mg/m2) every 3 weeks → 4 cycles of T (175 mg/m2) every 2 weeks | 60.00% | ||
SWOG S0221 | Arm 1: 6 cycles of A (60 mg/m2) + C (600 mg/m2) every 2 weeks → 6 cycles of T (175 mg/m2) every 2 weeks | 79.05% | All regimens provided similar outcomes in breast cancer subtypes, while a non-significant benefit was observed for bi-weekly regimen (Arm 1) in TNBC. |
Arm 2: 15 cycles of A (24 mg/m2) + C (60 mg/m2) weekly → 6 cycles of T (175 mg/m2) every 2 weeks | 72.38% | ||
Arm 3: 6 cycles of A (60 mg/m2) + C (600 mg/m2) every 2 weeks → 12 cycles of T (80 mg/m2) weekly | 73.33% | ||
Arm 4: 15 cycles of A (24 mg/m2) + C (60 mg/m2) weekly → 12 cycles of T (80 mg/m2) weekly | 69.52% |