Abstract
Digital phenotyping collects health data digitally, supporting early disease diagnosis and health management. This paper systematically reviews the diversity of research methods in digital phenotyping and its clinical benefits, while also focusing on its importance within the P4 medicine paradigm and its core role in advancing its application in biobanks. Furthermore, the paper envisions the continued clinical benefits of digital phenotyping, driven by technological innovation, global collaboration, and policy support.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Digital phenotyping is an innovative health monitoring method that utilizes smart devices, sensors, and mobile apps to continuously and real-time collect data on an individual’s behavior, psychological, and physiological states, thereby providing a comprehensive and dynamic portrayal of an individual’s health1,2,3,4. This concept was first introduced by researchers at Harvard University in 2015, aiming to meticulously capture behavioral characteristics in daily life through digital means, thus offering new avenues for research and management of mental health and physiological diseases3.
The breadth and potential of digital phenotyping lie in its ability to cover all aspects of everyday life. By collecting a variety of information such as smartphone usage patterns, social media activity, exercise data, heart rate, and sleep quality4, digital phenotyping can help healthcare professionals identify potential health risks and provide early warnings about changes in an individual’s health5. Additionally, this data can be used for personalized medicine, helping to develop more precise treatment plans.
With the widespread adoption of smart devices and mobile technology, digital phenotyping has gradually become a hot topic in medical research. It not only provides new tools for assessing mental health, such as the early detection of depression and anxiety, but also shows great potential in chronic disease management and rehabilitation monitoring. At the same time, the implementation of digital phenotyping has sparked discussions about data privacy and ethical issues. Balancing technological advancements with the protection of individual privacy has become a pressing challenge that needs to be addressed.
Classification of digital phenotyping
Digital phenotyping can be classified based on various dimensions such as data sources, collection methods, and analysis objectives (Fig. 1a). Below are the main classification approaches:
a Represents the classification of digital phenotypes based on data sources. b Represents the classification of digital phenotypes based on data collection methods. c Represents the classification of digital phenotypes based on analysis goals. d Represents the classification of digital phenotypes based on application scenarios.
Classification based on data sources
Behavioral phenotyping
This type of phenotyping uses monitoring and analysis of an individual’s daily behavior data to describe their health status. The data typically comes from smartphones, wearable devices, etc., and includes information such as step count, physical activity, sleep patterns, phone usage time, and social media activity (Fig. 1a)6,7. These data can reflect a person’s daily activity level, sleep and wake patterns, and social behaviors6,7.
Physiological phenotyping
This category involves monitoring an individual’s physiological parameters to assess their health. Sources of data include wearable medical devices, smartwatches, heart rate monitors, etc (Fig. 1a)8,9,10,11,12,13. Common physiological data include heart rate, blood pressure, blood glucose levels, body temperature, and respiratory rate. These data help evaluate cardiovascular health, metabolic status, and other physiological functions8,9,10,11,12,13.
Psychological phenotyping
This type monitors data related to an individual’s psychological state to assess their health, often involving emotions, stress levels, cognitive functions, etc. Data can be obtained through surveys, psychological assessment tools, and sentiment analysis (such as through social media or voice data) (Fig. 1a)14,15,16. Psychological phenotyping plays a crucial role in identifying and managing mental health issues like depression and anxiety14,15,16.
Environmental phenotyping
This type of phenotyping tracks an individual’s geographical location, travel patterns, and common destinations using mobile GPS. It monitors environmental factors such as air quality, noise levels, and temperature, typically using smartphone sensors or specialized devices (Fig. 1a)17,18.
Social phenotyping
This type analyzes call logs, text messages, and social media activities to assess social contacts, interaction frequency, and patterns (Fig. 1a). It evaluates the complexity of language, choice of vocabulary, and conversational patterns through text or voice analysis to understand an individual’s social and psychological state1,19.
Medical phenotyping
This category includes medication adherence medical phenotyping, and symptom tracking medical phenotyping. Medication adherence medical phenotyping monitors and records an individual’s timely medication intake using smart pillboxes and mobile reminders (Fig. 1a)20,21. Symptom tracking medical phenotyping employs mobile apps or online platforms to record and track changes in a patient’s symptoms, such as pain, fatigue, dizziness, etc20,21.
Classification based on methods of data collection
Active data collection
This type of data collection requires active participation or input from the user1,2,22,23,24. For example, users may log their diet and exercise routines through health apps or regularly complete psychological assessment questionnaires. This method generally yields more detailed and specific data but may be limited by the user’s level of participation and accuracy (Fig. 1b)1,2,23,24.
Passive data collection
This method involves data being automatically collected from a user’s devices or environment without any active input from the user22. For instance, a smartwatch might automatically monitor heart rate and step count, while a smartphone tracks usage time and geographical location. This approach allows for continuous, seamless data collection, reducing the burden on users, but it may lack specific contextual information (Fig. 1b)1,2.
Classification based on application scenarios
Public health phenotyping
This type of phenotyping is used in large-scale public health research to help analyze population health trends and formulate public health policies (Fig. 1c)25,26. By aggregating and analyzing the digital phenotyping data of a large number of individuals, researchers can identify health risk factors in specific regions or populations (Fig. 1c)25,26.
Personalized health phenotyping
This type of phenotyping is used for individual health management, providing personalized health advice and interventions (Fig. 1c)27,28,29,30. It customizes health plans based on an individual’s behavioral and physiological data, improving quality of life and health outcomes.
Through these classifications, digital phenotyping can provide targeted support for different health management needs, playing a key role in precision medicine, public health, and personalized healthcare.
Classification based on analysis objectives
Diagnostic phenotyping
This type of phenotyping is primarily used to support the diagnosis of diseases. By analyzing abnormal changes in specific behaviors or physiological patterns, digital phenotyping can help identify early signs of a disease (Fig. 1d)29,31,32. For example, significant changes in sleep patterns may be an indicator of depression31,32.
Predictive phenotyping
Predictive phenotyping aims to forecast future health events or risks of diseases (Fig. 1d)30,33,34. For instance, by monitoring physical activity and heart rate data over time, it is possible to predict an individual’s risk of developing cardiovascular diseases33,34.
Preventive phenotyping
This type of phenotyping is used to prevent the onset of diseases. By identifying potential health risk factors early, individuals can take preventative measures to halt the progression of diseases (Fig. 1d)28,35,36. For example, continuous monitoring of fluctuations in blood glucose levels can help prevent diabetes35,36.
Monitoring phenotyping
Used for ongoing monitoring of diagnosed health conditions or disease progression (Fig. 1d)37,38,39. For example, patients with diabetes can use digital phenotyping to continuously monitor their blood sugar levels, aiding in disease management37,38,39.
Clinical benefits of digital phenotyping
In the early 21st century, American biologist Professor Leroy Hood proposed the theory of P4 Medicine, emphasizing that in the era of precision medicine, the four principles of Predictive, Preventive, Personalized, and Participatory are core tenets40. Digital phenotyping is a concrete form of P4 Medicine, emerging as a result of advancements in digital sensor technology, wearable devices, and other digital technologies. It underscores the importance of digital monitoring, dynamic surveillance, disease heterogeneity, disease subphenotypes, and personalized treatment41.
Predictive
Predictive capability is a fundamental attribute of the P4 medicine framework, emphasizing that the comprehensive analysis of large-scale individual data (such as genomics, environment, behavior, lifestyle, and electronic health records) can achieve early disease risk prediction30,33,34. With the development of digital phenotyping, especially continuous and dynamic tracking of phenotypic data, it is not only possible to identify early signs and risks of diseases but also to provide effective health management strategies to slow down disease progression30,34,41. For example, Lakhtakia et al.42 used smartphone-based digital phenotyping as an important monitoring technology to explore the impact of smartphone usage patterns on the early identification of schizophrenia. The results indicated that smartphone-based digital phenotyping technology was associated with clinical outcome assessments42. Subsequently, Onnela et al.3, further confirmed that smartphone-based digital phenotyping, such as changes in smartphone usage patterns3,34,42, sleep quality39, and social behavior43, might signal the onset of mental health issues like depression or anxiety. By dynamically monitoring and detecting these abnormal behaviors early, it not only provides data support for clinical diagnoses but also offers valuable reference for early intervention in disease management (Fig. 2a).
Preventive
Similar to predictive characteristics, prevention is also an important aspect of P4 medicine, but it particularly emphasizes the core role of dietary changes, lifestyle modifications, and other factors in health management and disease prevention28,35,36. Prevention is not only about early intervention for future disease occurrence, but also an active approach to health management, aiming to reduce disease risk by improving an individual’s lifestyle. Digital phenotyping, with its extensive and continuous data collection capabilities, undoubtedly provides a solid data foundation for disease prevention in medical and health management. For example, Kim et al.44 explored the impact of exercise on weight, HbA1c (Glycated Hemoglobin A1c), fasting blood glucose, and other indicators in diabetic patients using a randomized controlled trial44. The results indicated that digital phenotyping technologies based on smartphone personal health record apps could help improve diabetes-related indices44. Furthermore, dynamic monitoring of chronic diseases such as obesity45,46, diabetes44,47,48,49, and cardiovascular diseases50,51,52 has shown that digital phenotyping can improve disease-related indices through lifestyle interventions such as exercise and diet (Fig. 2a).
Personalized
Personalized treatment and care are key features of P4 medicine, emphasizing that patient treatment and health management in the era of precision medicine should comprehensively consider the genetic and personalized characteristics of patients or care recipients. With the widespread adoption and application of digital phenotyping, researchers studying patients with the same disease phenotype have discovered significant heterogeneity in subphenotypic characteristics, medication adherence, and drug dosage28,29,30. For example, Inomata et al. utilized smartphones and the DryEyeRhythm application as research tools to evaluate and analyze the potential of digital phenotyping in assessing the phenotypic diversity and patient heterogeneity of dry eye disease41. The results indicated that the smartphone-based DryEyeRhythm application demonstrated strong patient stratification capabilities and significant potential for application in personalized treatment41. Subsequently, Kim et al.‘s study further demonstrated that a personalized exercise recommendation program based on a mobile application had positive effects on blood glucose control and weight management in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D)44.The extensive use of digital phenotyping not only enables healthcare providers to tailor medication dosages based on each individual’s unique lifestyle and health data but also allows for the customization of health-supportive treatment recommendations and plans by collecting and analyzing personal behavioral patterns, emotional changes, exercise habits, and other data28,29,30 (Fig. 2a).
Participatory
A key advantage of digital phenotyping is its ability to increase patient engagement in their own health management20,21,43. Through mobile applications or other digital tools, patients can access real-time information about their health status and receive personalized health advice, enabling them to actively participate in health decisions1,2,22,23,24. This highly participatory model not only raises patient awareness but also promotes better treatment adherence, improving clinical outcomes (Fig. 2a).
In summary, in the era of P4 medicine, digital phenotyping not only enables dynamic, real-time, and comprehensive monitoring of individual health data to achieve early prediction of diseases or disease risks9,11,30,34,38,53 but also helps mitigate disease risks through preventive, personalized, and participatory approaches8,54. Moreover, digital phenotyping plays a vital role in dynamic monitoring and management in fields such as exercise-assisted therapy45,50,55,56,57,58 and music-assisted therapy59,60, significantly enhancing the positive impact of lifestyle changes and increased physical activity on health. Therefore, digital phenotyping not only has extensive clinical application prospects but also holds the potential to become a driving force for transformative change in healthcare (Fig. 2a)1,5,22,24,61,62,63. In these cases or implementation examples, biobanks, especially large-scale biobanks like the UK Biobank64,65 and All of Us66, have demonstrated the immense value of digital phenotyping in scientific research in the era of P4 medicine, as well as its role in showcasing the clinical benefits and exemplary impacts brought by lifestyle changes and increased physical activity (Box 1).
Challenges and barriers to widespread adoption
Although digital phenotyping has broad application prospects, its promotion still faces multiple obstacles, primarily in terms of technology, privacy, ethics, and data integration (Fig. 3a).
Data privacy and security
Digital phenotyping involves the collection and analysis of large amounts of sensitive personal data, such as physiological indicators, behavioral patterns, and psychological states. If this data is misused or leaked, it could pose serious threats to personal privacy and security (Fig. 3a)2,67,68. Ensuring privacy protection during the collection and use of such data, and establishing transparent privacy policies and data protection measures, is the primary challenge to the widespread adoption of digital phenotyping2,68,69.
Ethical issues
The promotion of digital phenotyping also faces ethical dilemmas, particularly concerning data ownership, usage rights, and informed consent (Fig. 3a)2,67,68. Do patients fully understand and consent to how their data will be used when collected? Will the data be used for commercial purposes? How can transparency and fairness in data usage be ensured? These are pressing ethical issues that need to be addressed. Additionally, digital phenotyping may lead to data discrimination or inequality, such as unequal access to health data or medical services across different populations2,68,70.
Technological and infrastructure limitations
Digital phenotyping relies on the widespread use of smart devices, sensors, and mobile applications4,5. However, in technologically underdeveloped or resource-limited areas, the necessary hardware and network infrastructure may be lacking. Furthermore, device accuracy, continuity of data collection, and ease of use can affect the reliability and adoption of digital phenotyping. If the accuracy of devices is insufficient or the user experience is poor, it may lead to biased data or user dissatisfaction, which could hinder its promotion (Fig. 3a)4.
Data integration and standardization issues
The data generated by digital phenotyping comes from a variety of sources, including smartphones, wearable devices, and health applications. This data often exists in different formats and lacks uniform standards, making integration and analysis more challenging4. Healthcare systems need to establish standardized frameworks to ensure seamless integration of data from different sources, providing reliable support for medical decision-making (Fig. 3a)4.
Clinical validation and regulatory issues
Although digital phenotyping shows great potential, its effectiveness and safety still require further clinical validation67,68. A lack of sufficient research evidence may hinder its clinical adoption. Additionally, the regulatory framework is not yet fully developed, and different countries and regions manage health data differently (Fig. 3a)67,68. Digital phenotyping applications must reach consensus on compliance and legality to avoid legal disputes.
User acceptance and health literacy
Not everyone is willing or able to easily adapt to using digital devices to monitor their health. Older adults or users unfamiliar with technology may face difficulties using these tools. Moreover, some users may feel uncomfortable with continuous monitoring of their health data, fearing privacy breaches or misinterpretation of the data. These psychological and behavioral barriers could affect the widespread adoption of digital phenotyping4,21,67.
In conclusion, while digital phenotyping holds great potential in the medical field, achieving widespread adoption will require overcoming multiple obstacles, including privacy and security concerns, technical standards, ethical dilemmas, and improving user acceptance and data processing capabilities.
Future directions
As an emerging tool for health monitoring and management, digital phenotyping has several key future development directions focused on technological advancements, data integration, application expansion, and ethical regulations (Fig. 3b). Below are some key areas of development:
Technological innovation and intelligence
In the future, digital phenotyping will benefit from more advanced technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI)94, machine learning (ML)2, 5 G communication, the Internet of Things (IoT), and edge computing4. These technologies can further improve the accuracy and real-time capabilities of data collection:
AI and ML
AI and ML algorithms are being widely applied to the analysis and interpretation of complex digital phenotypic data94. Through deep learning models, systems can more accurately identify health patterns, predict health risks, and even provide personalized health recommendations2,19,71. In recent years, with the advancement of ML methods, particularly deep learning and meta-learning, deep learning-based digital twin technology has been extensively applied to the analysis and modeling of digital phenotypic data72,73,74. This technology plays a pivotal role in personalized medicine, disease progression monitoring, disease tipping point identification, chronic disease management, multi-center data sharing, and reducing medical risks and costs (Fig. 4a)72,73,74.
For example, Alam et al. explored digital twin models based on dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), revealing that multiple neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease and ALS, undergo a gradual transition phase75. These diseases show distinct tipping point characteristics in motor digital biomarkers, speech digital biomarkers, salivation digital biomarkers, and swallowing digital biomarkers75.
In recent years, digital twin models based on LLMs have been widely used in disease digital modeling. LLM-based digital twins not only demonstrate significant advantages in integrating semi-structured and unstructured digital phenotypic data in medical contexts, but they also excel in efficiently integrating multimodal data (Fig. 4b)75,76. Furthermore, they show greater potential in areas such as self-supervised learning and few-shot learning, efficient simulation of complex systems, multi-turn dialog and multi-scenario interactions, as well as privacy protection (Fig. 4b)76.
Sensor technology
The accurate monitoring of digital phenotypes relies on diverse sensor technologies and devices77,78. Currently, health and environmental monitoring sensor technologies, such as blood oxygen sensors, electrocardiogram (ECG/EKG) sensors, electrodermal activity (EDA/GSR) sensors, accelerometers, and ambient light sensors, are widely applied in digital phenotype monitoring77,78. However, these sensor technologies generally face challenges such as limited miniaturization, insufficient sensitivity, and poor compatibility. Therefore, exploring sensor technologies with higher compatibility, greater sensitivity, and advanced miniaturization—such as non-invasive blood glucose monitoring sensors4,79,80 and respiratory component monitoring and analysis sensors81,82—will enable digital phenotypes to encompass a broader range of health indicators and demonstrate greater application potential and value.
Edge computing
As an efficient computing architecture in the era of intelligent medicine, edge computing offers a secure, real-time, and fast-response solution for the efficient processing of data in the digital phenotype era24,77,83. Exploring digital phenotypes based on edge computing will provide novel approaches and methodologies for computation within digital architectures.
Cross-platform data integration and interoperability
Digital phenotyping involves diverse data sources, requiring seamless integration and interoperability across different devices and platforms (Fig. 3b):
Data standardization
Establishing unified data formats and exchange standards will improve compatibility between different devices and applications4,22. This includes not only physiological data but also behavioral and psychological data for comprehensive health monitoring.
Multi-source data integration
Future developments will focus on integrating digital phenotyping data with traditional biomedical data (such as genomic data and clinical records)4,22. By merging data from multiple sources, researchers and clinicians can gain a more comprehensive view of health, leading to more accurate health assessments and decisions.
Personalized health management and precision medicine
As digital phenotyping technology matures, it will be more deeply applied in personalized health management and precision medicine (Fig. 3b):
Personalized health advice
Through in-depth analysis of individual behavioral, psychological, and physiological data, systems can provide more personalized health advice, including recommendations on diet, exercise, sleep, and more27,30,48. This personalized management will significantly improve health outcomes.
Precision medicine
Digital phenotyping data can help doctors better understand how a patient’s lifestyle and environmental factors affect disease, leading to more precise treatment plans. For example, continuous monitoring of mental health data can help tailor treatments for depression28,32.
Public health and epidemiological applications
In the field of public health, digital phenotyping can provide new tools for epidemiological research and public health policy formulation (Fig. 3b):
Disease surveillance and early warning
By collecting and analyzing large-scale digital phenotyping data, public health agencies can more rapidly identify and respond to disease outbreaks and even predict potential epidemics22,61,63.
Health trend analysis
Digital phenotyping data can be used to analyze population health trends, helping to create more effective public health interventions22,63. For instance, emotional data from social media can help monitor changes in societal mental health22,63.
Data privacy and ethical issues
As digital phenotyping becomes more widespread, data privacy and ethical issues will become important topics (Fig. 3b):
Data privacy protection
Future development requires stricter data privacy protection measures, including data encryption, anonymization, and distributed storage technologies. Users should have full control over their data and decide how and to what extent it is used69.
Establishment of ethical frameworks
As digital phenotyping applications expand, establishing transparent and responsible ethical frameworks is essential. This includes informed consent, data use transparency, fairness, and other areas to ensure that technology does not lead to social inequities or discrimination69.
Global collaboration and policy development
The development of digital phenotyping requires global collaboration and coordination (Fig. 3b):
International cooperation
Countries need to cooperate internationally on technical standards, data sharing, and privacy protection to promote the global application and research of digital phenotyping42,54,63,84.
Policy and regulatory frameworks
Governments will need to formulate relevant policies and regulatory frameworks to govern the collection, use, and sharing of digital phenotyping data, ensuring the healthy development of the technology42,54,63.
In summary, the future development of digital phenotyping encompasses multiple areas, including technological innovation, data integration, personalized applications, public health impact, ethical and privacy protection, and global cooperation (Fig. 3b). As these fields continue to progress, digital phenotyping is expected to become a critical tool in the healthcare sector, driving the realization of precision medicine and personalized health management.
Conclusion
Digital phenotyping has a profound impact on clinical medicine, offering new possibilities for personalized treatment plans based on continuous individual data streams, which in turn improve therapeutic outcomes and shift healthcare from reactive care to proactive, preventive care, thus reducing medical costs. Furthermore, digital phenotyping plays a transformative role in public health, enabling researchers to precisely monitor population health trends, identify risk factors, and provide strong support for public health policy-making.
However, to fully realize these benefits, ongoing research and development are crucial. Challenges such as data privacy, security, integration, and standardization must be addressed to ensure the safe and effective application of digital phenotyping in clinical settings. Additionally, the complexity of integrating digital phenotyping data with traditional biomedical data requires innovative approaches in data science and bioinformatics. International collaboration is essential for harmonizing ethical and regulatory standards, ensuring that this technology is applied equitably across different regions and populations.
In conclusion, while digital phenotyping has already made a significant impact on healthcare, continued research and development are necessary to unlock its full potential. By addressing current limitations and enhancing global collaboration, digital phenotyping is poised to become a cornerstone of modern healthcare, driving advancements in precision medicine, personalized healthcare, and public health.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Lee, K. et al. Using digital phenotyping to understand health-related outcomes: a scoping review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 174, 105061 (2023).
Dlima, S. D., Shevade, S., Menezes, S. R. & Ganju, A. Digital phenotyping in health using machine learning approaches: scoping review. JMIR Bioinforma. Biotechnol. 3, e39618 (2022).
Onnela, J. P. & Rauch, S. L. Harnessing smartphone-based digital phenotyping to enhance behavioral and mental health. Neuropsychopharmacol. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 41, 1691–1696 (2016).
Huckvale, K., Venkatesh, S. & Christensen, H. Toward clinical digital phenotyping: a timely opportunity to consider purpose, quality, and safety. NPJ Digit. Med. 2, 88 (2019).
Langholm, C., Kowatsch, T., Bucci, S., Cipriani, A. & Torous, J. Exploring the potential of Apple SensorKit and digital phenotyping data as new digital biomarkers for mental health research. Digit. Biomark. 7, 104–114 (2023).
Bryan, A. D. et al. Behavioral and psychological phenotyping of physical activity and sedentary behavior: implications for weight management. Obesity25, 1653–1659 (2017).
Würbel, H. Behavioral phenotyping enhanced–beyond (environmental) standardization. Genes Brain Behav. 1, 3–8 (2002).
Chapman, D. G., King, G. G., Robinson, P. D., Farah, C. S. & Thamrin, C. The need for physiological phenotyping to develop new drugs for airways disease. Pharmacol. Res. 159, 105029 (2020).
Chan, A. H. Y. et al. DIGIPREDICT: physiological, behavioural and environmental predictors of asthma attacks-a prospective observational study using digital markers and artificial intelligence-study protocol. BMJ Open Respir. Res. 11, e002275 (2024).
Podéus, H. et al. A physiologically-based digital twin for alcohol consumption-predicting real-life drinking responses and long-term plasma PEth. NPJ Digit. Med. 7, 112 (2024).
Rykov, Y. G., Ng, K. P., Patterson, M. D., Gangwar, B. A. & Kandiah, N. Predicting the severity of mood and neuropsychiatric symptoms from digital biomarkers using wearable physiological data and deep learning. Comput. Biol. Med. 180, 108959 (2024).
Gibb, M., Winter, H., Komarzynski, S., Wreglesworth, N. I. & Innominato, P. F. Holistic needs assessment of cancer survivors-supporting the process through digital monitoring of circadian physiology. Integr. cancer Ther. 21, 15347354221123525 (2022).
Nilsson, J., Panizza, M. & Hallett, M. Principles of digital sampling of a physiologic signal. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 89, 349–358 (1993).
Cha, E. et al. Q-methodology and psychological phenotyping to design patient-centered diabetes education for persons with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy. Sci. Diab. Self-Manag. Care 48, 98–110 (2022).
Wang, D. & Shi, Z. H. Do psychological distress and digital sports influence the willingness to take the vaccine and precautionary saving? Empirical evidence from Shanghai. Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften J. Public Health, 1-13 (2023).
Santoro, E. Psychological interventions on the Internet and digital therapeutics in the field of mental health: are we ready?. Recent. Progress. Med. 113, 231–233 (2022).
Lane, E. et al. Digital phenotyping in adults with schizophrenia: a narrative review. Curr. psychiatry Rep. 25, 699–706 (2023).
Jaimini, U. et al. “How Is My Child’s Asthma?” digital phenotype and actionable insights for pediatric asthma. JMIR Pediatr. Parent. 1, e11988 (2018).
Jaiswal, A., Shah, A., Harjadi, C., Windgassen, E. & Washington, P. Ethics of the use of social media as training data for AI models used for digital phenotyping. JMIR Form. Res. 8, e59794 (2024).
Denyer, H. et al. ADHD remote technology study of cardiometabolic risk factors and medication adherence (ART-CARMA): a multi-centre prospective cohort study protocol. BMC Psychiatry 22, 813 (2022).
Albrechta, H. et al. Acceptance of digital phenotyping linked to a digital pill system to measure PrEP adherence among men who have sex with men with substance use. PLOS Digit. health 3, e0000457 (2024).
Marsch, L. A. Opportunities and needs in digital phenotyping. Neuropsychopharmacol. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 43, 1637–1638 (2018).
Chia, A. Z. R. & Zhang, M. W. B. Digital phenotyping in psychiatry: A scoping review. Technol. Health Care J. Eur. Soc. Eng. Med. 30, 1331–1342 (2022).
Onnela, J. P. Opportunities and challenges in the collection and analysis of digital phenotyping data. Neuropsychopharmacol. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 46, 45–54 (2021).
Dunn, A. G., Mandl, K. D. & Coiera, E. Social media interventions for precision public health: promises and risks. NPJ Digit. Med. 1, 47 (2018).
Kilgallon, J. L., Tewarie, I. A., Broekman, M. L. D., Rana, A. & Smith, T. R. Passive data use for ethical digital public health surveillance in a postpandemic world. J. Med. Internet Res. 24, e30524 (2022).
Akintunde, A. et al. Physiological phenotyping for personalized therapy of uncontrolled hypertension in Africa. Am. J. Hypertens.30, 923–930 (2017).
Torous, J. & Keshavan, M. Towards precision clinical trials and personalized prevention in CHR with smartphone digital phenotyping and personal sensing tools. Schizophrenia Res. 227, 61–62 (2021).
Chen, I. M., Chen, Y. Y., Liao, S. C. & Lin, Y. H. Development of digital biomarkers of mental illness via mobile apps for personalized treatment and diagnosis. J. Personal. Med. 12, 936 (2022).
Currey, D. & Torous, J. Digital phenotyping data to predict symptom improvement and mental health app personalization in college students: prospective validation of a predictive model. J. Med. Internet Res. 25, e39258 (2023).
Kas, M. J. H. et al. Digital behavioural signatures reveal trans-diagnostic clusters of Schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease patients. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. J. Eur. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 78, 3–12 (2024).
Jaiswal, A. & Washington, P. Using actuallyautistic on Twitter for precision diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: machine learning study. JMIR Form. Res. 8, e52660 (2024).
Pavarini, G. et al. Data sharing in the age of predictive psychiatry: an adolescent perspective. Evid. Based Ment. health 25, 69–76 (2022).
Simon, L. et al. The predictive value of supervised machine learning models for insomnia symptoms through smartphone usage behavior. Sleep. Med. X 7, 100114 (2024).
Zlatintsi, A. et al. E-prevention: advanced support system for monitoring and relapse prevention in patients with psychotic disorders analyzing long-term multimodal data from wearables and video captures. Sensors. 22 (2022).
Kleiman, E. M., Glenn, C. R. & Liu, R. T. The use of advanced technology and statistical methods to predict and prevent suicide. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 2, 347–359 (2023).
Lee, J. et al. Phenotypes of engagement with mobile health technology for heart rhythm monitoring. JAMIA open 4, ooab043 (2021).
Birk, R. H. & Samuel, G. Digital phenotyping for mental health: reviewing the challenges of using data to monitor and predict mental health problems. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 24, 523–528 (2022).
Langholm, C., Byun, A. J. S., Mullington, J. & Torous, J. Monitoring sleep using smartphone data in a population of college students. Npj Ment. health Res. 2, 3 (2023).
Hood, L. & Friend, S. H. Predictive, personalized, preventive, participatory (P4) cancer medicine. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 8, 184–187 (2011).
Inomata, T. et al. Smartphone-based digital phenotyping for dry eye toward P4 medicine: a crowdsourced cross-sectional study. NPJ Digit. Med. 4, 171 (2021).
Lakhtakia, T. et al. Smartphone digital phenotyping, surveys, and cognitive assessments for global mental health: Initial data and clinical correlations from an international first episode psychosis study. Digit. health 8, 20552076221133758 (2022).
Deng, H. et al. Moderation effects of daily behavior on associations between symptoms and social participation outcomes after burn injury: a 6-month digital phenotyping study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.105, 1700–1708 (2024).
Kim, G. et al. A randomized controlled trial of an app-based intervention on physical activity and glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes. BMC Med. 22, 185 (2024).
Spring, B. et al. An adaptive behavioral intervention for weight loss management: a randomized clinical trial. Jama 332, 21–30 (2024).
Thomas, K. et al. MINISTOP 3.0: Implementation of a mHealth obesity prevention program within Swedish child healthcare - study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 24, 2594 (2024).
Han, C. Y., Lim, S. L., Ong, K. W., Johal, J. & Gulyani, A. Behavioral lifestyle intervention program using mobile application improves diet quality in adults with prediabetes (D’LITE Study): a randomized controlled trial. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet.124, 358–371 (2024).
Zamanillo-Campos, R., Fiol-deRoque, M. A., Serrano-Ripoll, M. J., Mira-Martínez, S. & Ricci-Cabello, I. Development and evaluation of DiabeText, a personalized mHealth intervention to support medication adherence and lifestyle change behaviour in patients with type 2 diabetes in Spain: A mixed-methods phase II pragmatic randomized controlled clinical trial. Int. J. Med. Inform. 176, 105103 (2023).
Felker, G. M. et al. A Randomized controlled trial of mobile health intervention in patients with heart failure and diabetes. J. Card. Fail. 28, 1575–1583 (2022).
Gill, S. K. et al. Consumer wearable devices for evaluation of heart rate control using digoxin versus beta-blockers: the RATE-AF randomized trial. Nat. Med. 30, 2030–2036 (2024).
Foley, M. J. et al. Coronary sinus reducer for the treatment of refractory angina (ORBITA-COSMIC): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 403, 1543–1553 (2024).
Lee, J. et al. Wearable device-based intervention for promoting patient physical activity after lung cancer surgery: a nonrandomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw. Open 7, e2434180 (2024).
Lam, B. et al. Using wearable activity trackers to predict type 2 diabetes: machine learning-based cross-sectional study of the UK Biobank accelerometer cohort. JMIR Diab. 6, e23364 (2021).
Britton, G. B. et al. Digital phenotyping: an equal opportunity approach to reducing disparities in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia research. Alzheimer’s. Dement. 15, e12495 (2023).
Bhidayasiri, R. & Mari, Z. Digital phenotyping in Parkinson’s disease: Empowering neurologists for measurement-based care. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 80, 35–40 (2020).
Ji, H. et al. Sex differences in association of physical activity with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 83, 783–793 (2024).
Post, W. S. et al. Racial and ethnic differences in all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality: The MESA study. Circulation 146, 229–239 (2022).
Vásquez, E. et al. Ethnic differences in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality by physical activity levels among older adults in the US. Ethnicity health 23, 72–80 (2018).
Cordoba-Silva, J. et al. Music therapy with adult burn patients in the intensive care unit: short-term analysis of electrophysiological signals during music-assisted relaxation. Sci. Rep. 14, 23592 (2024).
Engelbrecht, R., Bhar, S., Shoemark, H., Elphinstone, B. & Ciorciari, J. Reminiscence therapy and music with older adults: a descriptive study investigating the current views and practices of Australian aged care providers and volunteers. J. Appl. Gerontol. Official J. Southern Gerontol. Soc. 43, 1305-1314 (2024).
Lovatt, M. & Holmes, J. Digital phenotyping and sociological perspectives in a Brave New World. Addiction112, 1286–1289 (2017).
Skinner, A. L. et al. Digital phenotyping and the development and delivery of health guidelines and behaviour change interventions. Addiction112, 1281–1285 (2017).
Torrado, J. C. et al. Digital phenotyping by wearable-driven artificial intelligence in older adults and people with Parkinson’s disease: Protocol of the mixed method, cyclic ActiveAgeing study. PloS one 17, e0275747 (2022).
Bycroft, C. et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature 562, 203–209 (2018).
Sudlow, C. et al. UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 12, e1001779 (2015).
Investigators, T. A. O. U. R. P. The “All of Us” research program. N. Engl. J. Med 381, 668–676 (2019).
Tomičić, A., Malešević, A. & Čartolovni, A. Ethical, legal and social issues of digital phenotyping as a future solution for present-day challenges: a scoping review. Sci. Eng. ethics 28, 1 (2021).
Montag, C., Sindermann, C. & Baumeister, H. Digital phenotyping in psychological and medical sciences: a reflection about necessary prerequisites to reduce harm and increase benefits. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 36, 19–24 (2020).
Martinez-Martin, N., Insel, T. R., Dagum, P., Greely, H. T. & Cho, M. K. Data mining for health: staking out the ethical territory of digital phenotyping. NPJ Digit. Med. 1 (2018).
Coghlan, S. & D’Alfonso, S. Digital phenotyping: an epistemic and methodological analysis. Philos. Technol. 34, 1905–1928 (2021).
Shen, F. X. et al. Returning individual research results from digital phenotyping in psychiatry. Am. J. Bioeth. AJOB 24, 69–90 (2024).
Sun, T., He, X. & Li, Z. Digital twin in healthcare: recent updates and challenges. Digit. Health 9, 20552076221149651 (2023).
Coorey, G. et al. The health digital twin to tackle cardiovascular disease-a review of an emerging interdisciplinary field. NPJ Digit. Med. 5, 126 (2022).
Laubenbacher, R., Mehrad, B., Shmulevich, I. & Trayanova, N. Digital twins in medicine. Nat. Comput. Sci. 4, 184–191 (2024).
Alam, N. et al. Digital Twin Generators for Disease Modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.01488 (2024).
Wang, Y. et al. TWIN-GPT: Digital Twins for Clinical Trials via Large Language Model. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1145/3674838 (2024).
Mansouri, Y. & Babar, M. A. A review of edge computing: features and resource virtualization. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 150, 155–183 (2021).
Severus, E. et al. Ambulatory monitoring and digital phenotyping in the diagnostics and treatment of bipolar disorders. Der Nervenarzt 90, 1215–1220 (2019).
Meyhöfer, S. et al. Evaluation of a near-infrared light ultrasound system as a non-invasive blood glucose monitoring device. Diab. Obes. Metab. 22, 694–698 (2020).
Moses, J. C. et al. Non-invasive blood glucose monitoring technology in diabetes management: review. mHealth 10, 9 (2024).
Hao, X. et al. Efficient mixed-potential acetone sensor with yttria-stabilized zirconia and porous Co(3)O(4) nanofoam sensing electrode for hazardous gas monitoring and breath analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 478, 135462 (2024).
Marges, E. R. et al. Detection of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease by exhaled breath analysis using electronic nose technology. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 210, 512–514 (2024).
Rocha, A. et al. Edge AI for internet of medical things: a literature review. Comput. Electr. Eng. 116, 109202 (2024).
Insel, T. R. Digital phenotyping: a global tool for psychiatry. World Psychiatry J. World Psychiatr. Assoc.17, 276–277 (2018).
Paskal, W., Paskal, A. M., Dębski, T., Gryziak, M. & Jaworowski, J. Aspects of modern biobank activity—comprehensive review. Pathol. Oncol. Res. POR 24, 771–785 (2018).
Sotelo, R. N. G., Centeno, J. E. O., Arzola, L. I. H. & Ruíz, E. B. A multidisciplinary approach to the Biobank concept: integrative review. Cienc. saude coletiva 26, 4321–4339 (2021).
Mendes, J. P. M. et al. Sensing apps and public data sets for digital phenotyping of mental health: systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 24, e28735 (2022).
Acknowledgements
B.S. acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32270690) and the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (Grant No. 2024YFHZ0205).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.S. conceived the project. B.S., Y.Z., and J.W. initially designed the entire workflow, A.U., H.Z., and R.S., extensively reviewed and discussed the rationality of the entire paper framework, providing modification suggestions. Y.Z. drafted the initial manuscript, J. W., X.L., R.W., and, S.R. edited it. All authors participated in the discussion of the results.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Zong, H. et al. The comprehensive clinical benefits of digital phenotyping: from broad adoption to full impact. npj Digit. Med. 8, 196 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01602-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01602-5