The rapid increase in real-time health information collected from wearable devices has allowed digital biomarkers to emerge as a promising tool to support perioperative care, including surgical prehabilitation, intra-operative guidance, and post-operative monitoring. Important challenges include the accuracy of generated information, data security risks, and slow adoption of new technologies. Active stakeholder engagement and following existing digital biomarker development/implementation frameworks may support using this technology to improve surgical outcomes.
Introduction
Digital biomarkers are quantifiable measures collected from digital health technologies that may act as indicators of biological processes1. The rapid increase in real-time health information collected from wearable devices has allowed digital biomarkers to emerge as a promising tool to support the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of various health conditions1. While digital biomarkers have broad applications in health care, their utilization in perioperative medicine represents an emerging area of study, practice development, and implementation science1. A discussion of the potential applications of digital biomarkers in perioperative care may be informative to surgeons, anesthesiologists, and other clinicians involved in caring for patients undergoing surgery. This is particularly relevant given multiple recent publications on digital biomarkers in perioperative care2,3,4. In this article, we discuss the potential role of digital biomarkers in the pre-operative, in-hospital, and post-operative phases of care to improve patient outcomes (Fig. 1).
Pre-operative care
A critical aspect of pre-operative care involves optimizing patients for surgery. Digital biomarkers can play an important role in prehabilitation, defined as interventions undertaken before surgery to reduce peri-operative risk5. Prehabilitation aims to improve patients’ functional capacity, nutritional status, and psychological readiness for surgery through exercise, dietary, and psychological support6. Digital biomarkers may support at-home prehabilitation programs, whereby patients can use wearable technologies to track their physical, nutritional, and mental health7. For example, Waller and colleagues (2022) showed that using wearable technologies during prehabilitation increased patients’ physical activity, walking distance, and functional status8. Notably, multiple mobile applications have been developed to support surgical prehabilitation9,10,11,12. Another central aspect of pre-operative care involves managing symptom burden13. At clinic visits, it may be challenging to completely appreciate the impact of illness on patients’ lives14. An example of the utility of digital biomarkers in pre-operative care is illustrated by Low and colleagues (2021), who showed that digital biomarker data captured through smartphones and smartwatches at home could be used to track patient-reported symptom burden based on activity patterns, sleep, screen time, pain, and fatigue in individuals scheduled for pancreatic surgery15. This may help patients and providers detect worsening perioperative symptoms and trigger timely symptom management interventions15.
In-hospital care
While in hospital, clinicians are often responsible for caring for patients with different acuity levels16. Digital biomarker systems using artificial intelligence may rapidly synthesize health indicators in real time, notifying providers promptly when patients show early signs of decompensation17. For example, the CHARTWatch system continuously monitors over 100 clinical variables for hospitalized patients and predicts their risk of requiring intensive care unit care or detioration within the next 48 hours. It provides a warning notification to the medical team for these high-risk patients so they can receive appropriate care18. Preliminary data demonstrated that the algorithm predicted patient outcomes >15% more accurately than clinicians, resulting in a ~15% reduction in mortality among high-risk patients18. This may be particularly helpful in surgery due to the high proportion of patients who could rapidly deteriorate given their medical complexity and often high-risk procedures19. Digital biomarker information may also be helpful for clinicians intra-operatively by measuring their stress levels. For example, Dias and colleagues (2023) used digital biomarker data from wearable sensors for heart rate variability that accurately captured acute stress levels in perfusionists operating the heart-lung machine during cardiac surgery4. Given that extremely high stress levels can lead to major intraoperative complications, a timely alert regarding a clinician’s level of stress can prompt the operative team to consider slowing down, re-evaluating the situation, and ensuring that safe surgery is provided20.
Post-operative care
After surgery, patients generally stay in hospital for several days or weeks until clinicians deem them to be fit to go home. However, most post-operative recovery occurs at home, particularly after major operations. During this transition, patients can often abruptly go from having every heartbeat monitored to minimal vital sign tracking. As a result, a significant proportion of patients are at risk of postoperative complications after they are discharged21. Digital biomarker systems informed by wearable technologies can allow patients and their providers to track important vital signs at home22. When there are signs of decompensation, an alert may be sent to the provider and/or patient to ensure that the patient seeks appropriate care22. Additionally, the study of patient-reported outcomes has become a priority in surgery23. One significant challenge is the current inability to capture longitudinal patient-reported information reliably23. Wearable technologies and digital biomarkers can allow patients to track their recovery process at home effectively and report outcomes most relevant to their well-being in a feasible and cost-effective manner23. For example, Kolk and colleagues (2023) showed that digital biomarker information obtained from wearable devices strongly correlated with patient-reported outcome measures in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators24. An example of how digital biomarkers may be used to better capture longitudinal patient-related information that can improve a clinician’s understanding of their patients and guide treatment plans is illustrated in Fig. 2.
Challenges
While digital biomarkers have important potential to improve perioperative care, several challenges must be considered. First, wearable products and digital technologies may generate inaccurate data. This is particularly concerning if these errors exacerbate structural health inequalities. For example, Sjoding and colleagues (2020) demonstrated that pulse oximeters had increased error rates in patients with different skin pigmentation25. Therefore, digital biomarkers must be validated on diverse and representative datasets before implementation. Second, digital biomarker data in health care should be confidential and shared only with the patient’s permission. Given the known potential for cyber threats to compromise the security of personal health information, data privacy must be a central consideration when designing digital biomarker systems26. Third, medicine can be slow to adopt new technologies, given their potential to have unintended negative consequences27. Therefore, co-development involving patients, clinicians, and healthcare administrators in designing and implementing digital biomarkers is critical. Conscientious stakeholder engagement will build trust, demonstrate transparency, and ultimately facilitate safe uptake of this technology.
Conclusions and next steps
Digital biomarkers derived from increasingly available wearable and digital technologies have the potential to augment and improve pre-operative, in-hospital, and post-operative care. This tool may support prehabilitation, track symptom burden, identify early signs of clinical deterioration, and capture patient-reported outcomes, among other applications. Although challenges of data accuracy, patient privacy, and slow uptake of new technologies in health care exist, active stakeholder engagement and collaboration may allow for the development of effective digital biomarkers that can improve surgical outcomes. By following existing frameworks such as the one developed by Daniore and colleagues28, considering issues of data collection, aggregation, contextualization, interpretation, and action, wearable sensor data can be effectively translated to digital biomarkers that can transform perioperative care.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Powell, D. Walk, talk, think, see and feel: harnessing the power of digital biomarkers in healthcare. NPJ Digit. Med. 7, 45 (2024).
Lapp, L., Roper, M., Kavanagh, K. & Schraag, S. Development and validation of a digital biomarker predicting acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery on an hourly basis. JTCVS Open 16, 540–581 (2023).
Bi, C. L. et al. Digital biomarkers and the evolution of spine care outcomes measures: Smartphones and wearables. Neurosurgery 93, 745–754 (2023).
Dias, R. D. et al. Using digital biomarkers for objective assessment of perfusionists’ workload and acute stress during cardiac surgery. Bioinforma. Biomed. Eng. 13919, 443–454 (2023). 10th Int. Work-Conf. IWBBIO 2023 Meloneras Gran Canar. Spain July 12-14 2023 Proc. Part IWBBIO Conf. 10th 2023 Gran Canar. Canary Isl.
Chmelo, J., Chmelová, I. & Phillips, A. W. Prehabilitation, improving postoperative outcomes. Rozhl. Chir. 100, 421–428 (2021).
Coca-Martinez, M. & Carli, F. Prehabilitation: Who can benefit? Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 50, 106979 (2024).
Blumenau Pedersen, M., Saxton, J., Birch, S., Rasmussen Villumsen, B. & Bjerggaard Jensen, J. The use of digital technologies to support home-based prehabilitation prior to major surgery: A systematic review. Surg. J. R. Coll. Surg. Edinb. Irel. 21, e305–e315 (2023).
Waller, E. et al. Prehabilitation with wearables versus standard of care before major abdominal cancer surgery: A randomised controlled pilot study (trial registration: NCT04047524). Surg. Endosc. 36, 1008–1017 (2022).
Prep4Surg. Prep4Surg https://www.prep4surg.com/ (2025).
Development of an interactive app for structured prehabilitation before major surgery – PROTEGO MAXIMA | Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung. https://www.ekfs.de/en/scientific-funding/currently-funded-projects/development-interactive-app
A pilot trial to analyze the usability, validity and safety of an interventional health app program (Patronus prehab app) for the structured prehabilitation of patients before major surgical interventions: PROTEGO MAXIMA. https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00026985
Capreolos debuts ‘prehab’ app for people facing surgery. pharmaphorum https://pharmaphorum.com/news/capreolos-debuts-prehab-app-people-facing-surgery (2023).
Oudhoff, J., Timmermans, D., Knol, D., Bijnen, A. & van der Wal, G. Waiting for elective general surgery: impact on health related quality of life and psychosocial consequences. BMC Public Health 7, 164 (2007).
Bernard, C. et al. Exploring patient-reported barriers to advance care planning in family practice. BMC Fam. Pract. 21, 94 (2020).
Low, C. A. et al. Digital biomarkers of symptom burden self-reported by perioperative patients undergoing pancreatic surgery: Prospective longitudinal study. JMIR Cancer 7, e27975 (2021).
Healey, M. A., Shackford, S. R., Osler, T. M., Rogers, F. B. & Burns, E. Complications in surgical patients. Arch. Surg. Chic. Ill 1960 137, 611–617 (2002).
Tyler, S. et al. Use of artificial intelligence in triage in hospital emergency departments: A scoping review. Cureus 16, e59906 (2024).
How artificial intelligence is helping Toronto hospitals predict patient outcomes and save lives. Gemini https://www.geminimedicine.ca/post/how-artificial-intelligence-is-helping-toronto-hospitals-predict-patient-outcomes-and-save-lives (2022).
Jeon, A. & Nagappan, L. Postoperative complications and disposition for vascular surgery. Anaesth. Intensive Care 51, 193–198 (2023).
Arora, S. et al. The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature. Surgery 147, 318–330.e1–6 (2010).
Morris, M. S., Deierhoi, R. J., Richman, J. S., Altom, L. K. & Hawn, M. T. The relationship between timing of surgical complications and hospital readmission. JAMA Surg. 149, 348–354 (2014).
Soon, S., Svavarsdottir, H., Downey, C. & Jayne, D. G. Wearable devices for remote vital signs monitoring in the outpatient setting: An overview of the field. BMJ Innov. 6, 55–71 (2020).
Billig, J. I., Sears, E. D., Travis, B. N. & Waljee, J. F. Patient-reported outcomes: understanding surgical efficacy and quality from the patient’s perspective. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 27, 56–64 (2020).
Kolk, M. et al. Behavioural digital biomarkers enable real-time monitoring of patient-reported outcomes: a substudy of the multicenter, prospective observational SafeHeart study. Eur. Heart J. Qual. Care Clin. Outcomes qcad069 https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad069 (2023).
Sjoding, M. W., Dickson, R. P., Iwashyna, T. J., Gay, S. E. & Valley, T. S. Racial bias in pulse oximetry measurement. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 2477–2478 (2020).
Kruse, C. S., Frederick, B., Jacobson, T. & Monticone, D. K. Cybersecurity in healthcare: A systematic review of modern threats and trends. Technol. Health Care Off. J. Eur. Soc. Eng. Med. 25, 1–10 (2017).
Safi, S., Thiessen, T. & Schmailzl, K. J. Acceptance and resistance of new digital technologies in medicine: Qualitative study. JMIR Res. Protoc. 7, e11072 (2018).
Daniore, P. et al. From wearable sensor data to digital biomarker development: Ten lessons learned and a framework proposal. Npj Digit. Med. 7, 1–8 (2024).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.L., A.M., and D.P. developed the concept, wrote the manuscript, and amended the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests. D.P. is a News & Views editor at npj Digital Medicine and played no role in the internal review or decision to publish this News & Views article.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, B., Mahajan, A. & Powell, D. Advancing perioperative care with digital applications and wearables. npj Digit. Med. 8, 214 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01620-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01620-3