Table 2 Transdiagnostic-focused apps vs control at post-intervention
From: Transdiagnostic-focused apps for depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis
Analysis | N comparisons | g (95% CI) | I2 | NNT | PI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Combined outcomes | |||||
Total effect | 23 | 0.29 (0.17, 0.40) | 60% | 11.4 | −0.14, 0.72 |
One effect per study (smallest) | 19 | 0.31 (0.19, 0.43) | 56% | 10.2 | −0.10, 0.73 |
One effect per study (largest) | 19 | 0.35 (0.24, 0.46) | 45% | 8.9 | 0.00, 0.69 |
Outliers removed | 20 | 0.26 (0.16, 0.36) | 34% | 12.4 | −0.02, 0.52 |
High risk of bias excluded | 17 | 0.27 (0.12, 0.41) | 66% | 11.9 | −0.26, 0.80 |
Trim-and-fill estimate | 0.29 (0.17, 0.40) | 13.5 | |||
Depression | |||||
Total effect | 21 | 0.27 (0.14, 0.40) | 68% | 11.9 | −0.23, 0.78 |
One effect per study (smallest) | 17 | 0.29 (0.16, 0.43) | 64% | 11.4 | −0.18, 0.78 |
One effect per study (largest) | 17 | 0.32 (0.18, 0.46) | 53% | 9.9 | −0.18, 0.83 |
Outliers removed | 19 | 0.27 (0.14, 0.39) | 58% | 11.9 | −0.15, 0.69 |
High risk of bias excluded | 15 | 0.23 (0.07, 0.39) | 71% | 14.2 | −0.35, 0.81 |
Trim-and-fill estimate | 0.27 (0.14, 0.40) | 13.5 | |||
Anxiety | |||||
Total effect | 20 | 0.30 (0.17, 0.42) | 65% | 10.6 | −0.16, 0.76 |
One effect per study (smallest) | 16 | 0.32 (0.18, 0.46) | 63% | 9.9 | −0.14, 0.79 |
One effect per study (largest) | 16 | 0.34 (0.19, 0.49) | 68% | 9.2 | −0.18, 0.87 |
Outliers removed | 17 | 0.25 (0.15, 0.34) | 27% | 12.9 | 0.01, 0.40 |
High risk of bias excluded | 14 | 0.29 (0.12, 0.45) | 73% | 11.4 | −0.31, 0.89 |
Trim-and-fill estimate | 0.30 (0.17, 0.42) | 10.6 | |||
General distress | |||||
Total effect | 6 | 0.29 (0.09, 0.50) | 0% | 11.4 | 0.08, 0.49 |
One effect per study (smallest) | 5 | 0.31 (0.09, 0.52) | 0% | 10.2 | 0.09, 0.52 |
One effect per study (largest) | 5 | 0.32 (0.10, 0.53) | 0% | 9.9 | 0.10, 0.53 |
High risk of bias excluded | 4 | 0.33 (0.11, 0.56) | 0% | 9.5 | 0.10, 0.55 |
Trim-and-fill estimate | 0.33 (0.14, 0.52) | 9.5 | |||
