Table 4 Transdiagnostic-focused apps vs control at follow-up
From: Transdiagnostic-focused apps for depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis
Analysis | Ncomparisons | g (95% CI) | I2 | NNT | PI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Combined outcomes | |||||
Total effect | 11 | 0.25 (0.10, 0.41) | 44% | 12.9 | −0.13, 0.63 |
One effect per study (smallest) | 10 | 0.25 (0.09, 0.41) | 48% | 12.9 | −0.15, 0.65 |
One effect per study (largest) | 10 | 0.25 (0.09, 0.41) | 48% | 12.9 | −0.16, 0.66 |
High risk of bias excluded | 8 | 0.31 (0.14, 0.47) | 28% | 10.6 | −0.04, 0.64 |
Trim-and-fill estimate | 0.14 (0.01, 0.28) | 24.1 | |||
Depression | |||||
Total effect | 10 | 0.21 (0.04, 0.38) | 51% | 15.6 | −0.22, 0.64 |
One effect per study (smallest) | 9 | 0.21 (0.04, 0.39) | 57% | 15.6 | −0.26, 0.68 |
One effect per study (largest) | 9 | 0.22 (0.04, 0.39) | 56% | 14.9 | −0.25, 0.59 |
High risk of bias excluded | 7 | 0.27 (0.07, 0.48) | 49% | 11.9 | −0.24, 0.78 |
Trim-and-fill estimate | 0.21 (0.04, 0.37) | 20.9 | |||
Anxiety | |||||
Total effect | 10 | 0.25 (0.10, 0.40) | 40% | 12.9 | −0.11, 0.61 |
One effect per study (smallest) | 9 | 0.25 (0.09, 0.40) | 44% | 12.9 | −0.12, 0.62 |
One effect per study (largest) | 8 | 0.25 (0.09, 0.41) | 46% | 12.9 | −0.13, 0.63 |
High risk of bias excluded | 7 | 0.30 (0.14, 0.47) | 19% | 10.6 | 0.01, 0.58 |
Trim-and-fill estimate | 0.08 (−0.07, 0.24) | 43.2 | |||
