Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Electrode separation via water electrolysis for sustainable battery recycling

An Author Correction to this article was published on 15 May 2025

This article has been updated

Abstract

Recycling large quantities of lithium-ion batteries facing retirement is pivotal for resource conservation and environmental sustainability. Direct recycling, while offering a promising avenue with reduced waste compared with pyrometallurgy and hydrometallurgy, often involves intricate and long processes. Here we introduce a water electrolysis-induced separation approach, using H2 or O2 gas bubbling to efficiently separate electrode materials from current collectors. The process achieves 99.5% materials recovery with metal impurities <40 ppm within 34 s for LiFePO4 and 3 s for graphite at 10 mA cm−2, with minimal energy consumption of 11 and 1.1 kJ kgcell−1. Moreover, this approach accommodates various electrode types, encompassing cathodes and anodes from spent batteries or manufacturing scraps. The subsequent dry electrode manufacturing process with lithium replenishment substantially enhances environmental sustainability by eliminating the use of N-methyl pyrrolidone, while maintaining performance through the effective mixing of active materials and conductive agents. An EverBatt analysis underscores a remarkable reduction in energy consumption and waste generation compared with industrially adopted recycling methods. This finding provides an efficient and sustainable solution for battery recycling while ensuring high-quality materials production.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Separation of LFP cathode with the WES method.
Fig. 2: Characterizations of the WES process using LFP electrodes in various configurations.
Fig. 3: Separation of Gr anode using the WES method.
Fig. 4: Characterizations of dry electrodes fabricated using recycled black mass.
Fig. 5: Environmental and economic analysis of different recycling methods.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data supporting this research are available in the main text and the Supplementary Information and original data can be obtained from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. The EverBatt database can be downloaded via https://www.anl.gov/amd/reference/everbatt-model-download-form. Source data are provided with this paper.

Change history

References

  1. Blomgren, G. E. The development and future of lithium ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A5019–A5025 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer, C. et al. Charging sustainable batteries. Nat. Sustain. 5, 176–178 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mayyas, A., Moawad, K., Chadly, A. & Alhseinat, E. Can circular economy and cathode chemistry evolution stabilize the supply chain of Li-ion batteries? Extr. Ind. Soc. 14, 101253 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dunn, J., Kendall, A. & Slattery, M. Electric vehicle lithium-ion battery recycled content standards for the US—targets, costs, and environmental impacts. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 185, 106488 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tao, Y., Rahn, C. D., Archer, L. A. & You, F. Second life and recycling: Energy and environmental sustainability perspectives for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Sci. Adv. 7, eabi7633 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grosjean, C., Miranda, P. H., Perrin, M. & Poggi, P. Assessment of world lithium resources and consequences of their geographic distribution on the expected development of the electric vehicle industry. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 16, 1735–1744 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Holzer, A., Windisch-Kern, S., Ponak, C. & Raupenstrauch, H. A novel pyrometallurgical recycling process for lithium-ion batteries and its application to the recycling of LCO and LFP. Metals 11, 149 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pan, C. & Shen, Y. F. Pyrometallurgical recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries from conventional roasting to synergistic pyrolysis with organic wastes. J. Energy Chem. 85, 547–561 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sattar, R., Ilyas, S., Bhatti, H. N. & Ghaffar, A. Resource recovery of critically-rare metals by hydrometallurgical recycling of spent lithium ion batteries. Sep. Purif. Technol. 209, 725–733 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vieceli, N. et al. Hydrometallurgical recycling of lithium-ion batteries by reductive leaching with sodium metabisulphite. Waste Manag. 71, 350–361 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu, P. P. et al. Efficient direct recycling of lithium-ion battery cathodes by targeted healing. Joule 4, 2609–2626 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fan, M. et al. In situ electrochemical regeneration of degraded LiFePO4 electrode with functionalized prelithiation separator. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2103630 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, J. X. et al. Direct conversion of degraded LiCoO2 cathode materials into high-performance LiCoO2: a closed-loop green recycling strategy for spent lithium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 45, 768–776 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, J., Wang, W., Yang, H. & Wang, D. One-pot compositional and structural regeneration of degraded LiCoO2 for directly reusing it as a high-performance lithium-ion battery cathode. Green Chem. 22, 6489–6496 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu, X. L. et al. Achieving low-temperature hydrothermal relithiation by redox mediation for direct recycling of spent lithium-ion battery cathodes. Energy Storage Mater. 51, 54–62 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang, Y., Huang, G. Y., Xu, S. M., He, Y. H. & Liu, X. Thermal treatment process for the recovery of valuable metals from spent lithium-ion batteries. Hydrometallurgy 165, 390–396 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fan, E. S. et al. Selective recovery of Li and Fe from spent lithium-ion batteries by an environmentally friendly mechanochemical approach. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6, 11029–11035 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, X. P., Li, S. Z., Wu, X., Zhou, T. & Ma, H. R. In-situ recycling of coating materials and Al foils from spent lithium ion batteries by ultrasonic-assisted acid scrubbing. J. Clean. Prod. 258, 120943 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao, Y. et al. A novel three-step approach to separate cathode components for lithium-ion battery recycling. Rare Met. 40, 1431–1436 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jena, K. K. & Choi, D. S. Recycling of cathode active materials from spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs): effective methodology for environmental remediation. Mater. Chem. Phys. 311, 128532 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, K. & Zhang, F. S. Innovative leaching of cobalt and lithium from spent lithium-ion batteries and simultaneous dechlorination of polyvinyl chloride in subcritical water. J. Hazard. Mater. 316, 19–25 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yao, H. et al. Recycling of spent lithium iron phosphate cathodes: challenges and progress. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16, 67087–67105 (2024).

  23. Natarajan, S. & Aravindan, V. An urgent call to spent LIB recycling: whys and wherefores for graphite recovery. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 2002238 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng, Q., Marchetti, B., Chen, X. Y., Xu, S. & Zhou, X. D. Separation, purification, regeneration and utilization of graphite recovered from spent lithium-ion batteries—a review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 10, 107312 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Song, D. W. et al. Heat treatment of LiCoO2 recovered from cathode scraps with solvent method. J. Power Sources 249, 137–141 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, X. X. et al. Sustainable recycling and regeneration of cathode scraps from industrial production of lithium-ion batteries. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 4, 7041–7049 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, H. et al. Transient and dry recycling of battery materials with negligible carbon footprint and roll-to-roll scalability. Energy Environ. Sci. 16, 2561–2571 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, Z. et al. Reaction-passivation mechanism driven materials separation for recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 14, 4648 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. He, L. P., Sun, S. Y., Song, X. F. & Yu, J. G. Recovery of cathode materials and Al from spent lithium-ion batteries by ultrasonic cleaning. Waste Manag. 46, 523–528 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gastol, D. et al. Reclaimed and up-cycled cathodes for lithium-ion batteries. Glob. Chall. 6, 2200046 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lei, C. H. et al. Lithium ion battery recycling using high-intensity ultrasonication. Green Chem. 23, 4710–4715 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang, B. et al. Self-powered recycling of spent lithium iron phosphate batteries via triboelectric nanogenerator. Energy Environ. Sci. 16, 3873–3884 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ji, G. et al. Direct regeneration of degraded lithium-ion battery cathodes with a multifunctional organic lithium salt. Nat. Commun. 14, 584 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang, Y. et al. Simultaneous anodic de-lithiation/cathodic lithium-embedded regeneration method for recycling of spent LiFePO4 battery. Energy Storage Mater. 65, 103081 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Han, F. et al. Alkali-enhanced polyvinylidene fluoride cracking to deeply remove aluminum impurities for regeneration of battery-grade lithium iron phosphate. Chem. Eng. J. 483, 148973 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen, W. et al. Flash recycling of graphite anodes. Adv. Mater. 35, e2207303 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yuwen, C. et al. Efficient recovery and regeneration of waste graphite through microwave stripping from spent batteries anode for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. J. Clean. Prod. 333, 130197 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yuan, C., Deng, Y. L., Li, T. H. & Yang, F. Manufacturing energy analysis of lithium ion battery pack for electric vehicles. CIRP Ann-Manuf. Techn. 66, 53–56 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dai, Q. et al. EverBatt: A Closed-Loop Battery Recycling Cost and Environmental Impacts Model (Argonne National Lab, 2019).

Download references

Acknowledgements

C.W. thanks the support of the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFB3803400), the Shanghai Pujiang Program (22PJ1413400) and the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

F.Y. and C.W. conceived the research idea. F.Y., X.C., W.W. and G.L. designed the experiments. F.Y., X.C. and G.Q. carried out electrode fabrication and electrochemical characterization. Q.N., G.Q. and W.W. assisted with material characterization. T.W. and C.W. assisted in revising the paper. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the data analysis. F.Y. and X.C. wrote the paper with contributions from all authors. S.L., Y.H, J.L. and C.W. supervised the work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sa Li, Yunhui Huang, Ju Li or Chao Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Sustainability thanks Youngsik Kim, Xiangyang Zhou and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Discussion, Figs. 1–55 and Table 1.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

The separation of LFP electrode via the WES method.

Supplementary Video 2

The separation of LFP electrodes from a spent pouch cell via the WES method.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, F., Chen, X., Qu, G. et al. Electrode separation via water electrolysis for sustainable battery recycling. Nat Sustain 8, 520–529 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01539-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01539-3

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing