Fig. 2: GLM result for the continuous vs. binary feedback conditions in sensorimotor regions. | Communications Biology

Fig. 2: GLM result for the continuous vs. binary feedback conditions in sensorimotor regions.

From: Double dissociation of visuomotor interaction mediated by visual feedback during continuous de novo motor learning

Fig. 2

A Univariate activation map from the lateral view for the contrast, continuous feedback > binary feedback. B Enlarged map for (A) highlighting sensorimotor regions. C ROI analysis (see Methods) of the mean activation (\(\pm\) standard error of the mean) across the 28 searchlights. The inset shows the sensorimotor ROIs, the intersection of the significant clusters identified from the localizer GLM result, and the Brodmann areas 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6. The t-test results are based on the seven Brodmann areas. Note that the significance level is unusually high in BA4a, despite a small difference with a relatively large standard error of the mean. The significance level of multiple paired t-tests was represented by asterisks as follows. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 10−4 (Bonferroni-corrected). Red and blue dots in (C) represent individual data for corresponding conditions.

Back to article page