Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Biology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications biology
  3. articles
  4. article
Selective binding of divalent cations reshapes nucleosome mechanics and unlocks histone tail dynamics
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 05 February 2026

Selective binding of divalent cations reshapes nucleosome mechanics and unlocks histone tail dynamics

  • Guanhua Hu1,
  • Houfang Zhang1,
  • Wang Xu1,
  • Gege Liu1 &
  • …
  • Yunhui Peng  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9552-68381 

Communications Biology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 864 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational biophysics
  • Computational models

Abstract

Divalent cations such as Mg2+ and Ca2+ are key modulators of chromatin architecture, yet their atomistic influence on nucleosome structure and histone tail dynamics remains elusive. Here, we present 81 microseconds of all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to dissect how these ions shape nucleosome dynamics and plasticity. We quantitively mapped the selective binding patterns of Mg2+ and Ca2+ in nucleosomes with and without histone tails, revealing distinct ion–nucleosome interactions. Notably, divalent ion binding reduces inter-gyre electrostatic repulsion, facilitates DNA gyre compaction, and increases nucleosome stiffness, as quantified by estimates of the Young’s modulus and correlated motions within specific DNA regions. Importantly, ion binding weakens histone tail–DNA interactions and enhances tail mobility—particularly that of H3—potentially facilitating access by chromatin regulators and tail-mediated chromatin compaction. These findings reveal a dual role of divalent ions in modulating nucleosome plasticity while reinforcing histone tail dynamics, providing a mechanistic framework for understanding how ionic fluctuations influence gene accessibility and chromatin state.

Similar content being viewed by others

Binding of regulatory proteins to nucleosomes is modulated by dynamic histone tails

Article Open access 06 September 2021

Histone dynamics mediate DNA unwrapping and sliding in nucleosomes

Article Open access 22 April 2021

Effect of histone H4 tail on nucleosome stability and internucleosomal interactions

Article Open access 16 December 2021

Data availability

All simulation parameter files, MD trajectories underlying the figures, are available from the Zenodo repository at (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18232757)89. Processed data used to generate the figures and statistical analyses are included in the same repository. All other data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

All custom analysis scripts used in this study are available from the Zenodo repository at (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18232757)89. DNA geometry and dynamics were analyzed using AMBER Tools 22 and Bio3D (v2.4.5). Electrostatic analyses were performed using DelPhiForce. Molecular visualization and trajectory inspection were performed using VMD (v1.9.4a) and UCSF Chimera (v1.17.3).

References

  1. Almassalha, L. M. et al. Chromatin conformation, gene transcription, and nucleosome remodeling as an emergent system. Sci. Adv. 11, eadq6652 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Phengchat, R. et al. Calcium ions function as a booster of chromosome condensation. Sci. Rep. 6, 38281 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hansen, J. C., Maeshima, K. & Hendzel, M. J. The solid and liquid states of chromatin. Epigenetics Chromatin 14, 50 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lin, X. & Zhang, B. Explicit ion modeling predicts physicochemical interactions for chromatin organization. eLife 12, RP90073 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Korolev, N., Vorontsova, O. V. & Nordenskiöld, L. Physicochemical analysis of electrostatic foundation for DNA–protein interactions in chromatin transformations. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 95, 23–49 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bloomfield, V. A. DNA condensation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6, 334–341 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Collepardo-Guevara, R. & Schlick, T. Crucial role of dynamic linker histone binding and divalent ions for DNA accessibility and gene regulation revealed by mesoscale modeling of oligonucleosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 8803–8817 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Visvanathan, A. et al. Modulation of higher order chromatin conformation in mammalian cell nuclei can be mediated by polyamines and divalent cations. PLoS ONE 8, e67689 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vashishtha, A. K., Wang, J. & Konigsberg, W. H. Different divalent cations alter the kinetics and fidelity of DNA polymerases. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 20869–20875 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sukhanova, M. V., Anarbaev, R. O., Maltseva, E. A., Kutuzov, M. M. & Lavrik, O. I. Divalent and multivalent cations control liquid-like assembly of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated PARP1 into multimolecular associates in vitro. Commun. Biol. 7, 1148 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berridge, M. J., Bootman, M. D. & Roderick, H. L. Calcium signalling: dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 517–529 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hartwig, A. Role of magnesium in genomic stability. Mutat. Res. 475, 113–121 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ohyama, T. New aspects of magnesium function: a key regulator in nucleosome self-assembly, chromatin folding and phase separation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 4232 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. McGinty, R. K. & Tan, S. Principles of nucleosome recognition by chromatin factors and enzymes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 71, 16–26 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou, K., Gaullier, G. & Luger, K. Nucleosome structure and dynamics are coming of age. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 3–13 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, H. et al. Electrostatic interactions in nucleosome and higher-order structures are regulated by protonation state of histone ionizable residue. J. Chem. Phys. 162, 105101 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Park, S. et al. Native nucleosomes intrinsically encode genome organization principles. Nature 643, 572–581 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gebala, M., Johnson, S. L., Narlikar, G. J. & Herschlag, D. Ion counting demonstrates a high electrostatic field generated by the nucleosome. eLife 8, e44993 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Davey, C. A. & Richmond, T. J. DNA-dependent divalent cation binding in the nucleosome core particle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 11169–11174 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nap, R. J. et al. The impact of charge regulation and ionic intranuclear environment on the nucleosome core particle. J. Chem. Phys. 161, 235101 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yang, Z. & Hayes, J. J. The divalent cations Ca2+ and Mg2+ play specific roles in stabilizing histone-DNA interactions within nucleosomes that are partially redundant with the core histone tail domains. Biochemistry 50, 9973–9981 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wright, R. H. G., Le Dily, F. & Beato, M. ATP, Mg2+, nuclear phase separation, and genome accessibility. Trends Biochem. Sci. 44, 565–574 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Grubbs, R. D. Intracellular magnesium and magnesium buffering. Biometals 15, 251–259 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Maeshima, K. et al. A transient rise in free Mg(2+) ions released from ATP-Mg hydrolysis contributes to mitotic chromosome condensation. Curr. Biol. 28, 444–451.e446 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peng, Y., Li, S., Onufriev, A., Landsman, D. & Panchenko, A. R. Binding of regulatory proteins to nucleosomes is modulated by dynamic histone tails. Nat. Commun. 12, 5280 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Patel, R., Onyema, A., Tang, P. K. & Loverde, S. M. Conformational dynamics of the nucleosomal histone H2B tails revealed by molecular dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 64, 4709–4726 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Erler, J. et al. The role of histone tails in the nucleosome: a computational study. Biophys. J. 107, 2911–2922 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Patel, R. & Loverde, S. M. Unveiling the conformational dynamics of the histone tails using Markov state modeling. J. Chem. Theory Comput 21, 4921–4938 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Grigoryev, S. A., Arya, G., Correll, S., Woodcock, C. L. & Schlick, T. Evidence for heteromorphic chromatin fibers from analysis of nucleosome interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 13317–13322 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Correll, S. J., Schubert, M. H. & Grigoryev, S. A. Short nucleosome repeats impose rotational modulations on chromatin fibre folding. EMBO J. 31, 2416–2426 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Allahverdi, A., Chen, Q., Korolev, N. & Nordenskiöld, L. Chromatin compaction under mixed salt conditions: opposite effects of sodium and potassium ions on nucleosome array folding. Sci. Rep. 5, 8512 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Farr, S. E., Woods, E. J., Joseph, J. A., Garaizar, A. & Collepardo-Guevara, R. Nucleosome plasticity is a critical element of chromatin liquid–liquid phase separation and multivalent nucleosome interactions. Nat. Commun. 12, 2883 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chen, P., Li, G. & Li, W. Nucleosome dynamics derived at the single-molecule level bridges its structures and functions. JACS Au 4, 866–876 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Armeev, G. A., Kniazeva, A. S., Komarova, G. A., Kirpichnikov, M. P. & Shaytan, A. K. Histone dynamics mediate DNA unwrapping and sliding in nucleosomes. Nat. Commun. 12, 2387 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Melters, D. P. et al. Intrinsic elasticity of nucleosomes is encoded by histone variants and calibrated by their binding partners. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 24066–24074 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Strick, R., Strissel, P. L., Gavrilov, K. & Levi-Setti, R. Cation-chromatin binding as shown by ion microscopy is essential for the structural integrity of chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 155, 899–910 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ahmad, R., Arakawa, H. & Tajmir-Riahi, H. A. A comparative study of DNA complexation with Mg(II) and Ca(II) in aqueous solution: major and minor grooves bindings. Biophys. J. 84, 2460–2466 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fu, H. et al. Opposite effects of high-valent cations on the elasticities of DNA and RNA duplexes revealed by magnetic tweezers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 058101 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Xi, K., Wang, F.-H., Xiong, G., Zhang, Z.-L. & Tan, Z.-J. Competitive binding of Mg2+ and Na+ ions to nucleic acids: from helices to tertiary structures. Biophys. J. 114, 1776–1790 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bai, Y. et al. Quantitative and comprehensive decomposition of the ion atmosphere around nucleic acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 14981–14988 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Long, M. P., Alland, S., Martin, M. E. & Isborn, C. M. Molecular dynamics simulations of alkaline earth metal ions binding to DNA reveal ion size and hydration effects. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 5584–5596 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Xu, H.-T., Zhang, N., Li, M.-R. & Zhang, F.-S. Comparison of the ionic effects of Ca2+ and Mg2+ on nucleic acids in liquids. J. Mol. Liq. 344, 117781 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sharma, A. & Mishra, R. K. A brief study of the effects of magnesium divalent ions on the Dickerson DNA sequence at varying molar concentrations. Eur. Phys. J. 140, 60 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Singh, H. R., Murawska, M. & Ladurner, A. G. Remodelers tap into nucleosome plasticity. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 341–343 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nocetti, N. & Whitehouse, I. Nucleosome repositioning underlies dynamic gene expression. Genes Dev. 30, 660–672 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Watanabe, S., Mishima, Y., Shimizu, M., Suetake, I. & Takada, S. Interactions of HP1 bound to H3K9me3 dinucleosome by molecular simulations and biochemical assays. Biophys. J. 114, 2336–2351 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Peng, Y., Li, S., Landsman, D. & Panchenko, A. R. Histone tails as signaling antennas of chromatin. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 67, 153–160 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ghoneim, M., Fuchs, H. A. & Musselman, C. A. Histone tail conformations: a fuzzy affair with DNA. Trends Biochem. Sci. 46, 564–578 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Morrison, E. A., Baweja, L., Poirier, M. G., Wereszczynski, J. & Musselman, C. A. Nucleosome composition regulates the histone H3 tail conformational ensemble and accessibility. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 4750–4767 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zhou, B. R. et al. Histone H4 K16Q mutation, an acetylation mimic, causes structural disorder of its N-terminal basic patch in the nucleosome. J. Mol. Biol. 421, 30–37 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Schwarz, P. M., Felthauser, A., Fletcher, T. M. & Hansen, J. C. Reversible oligonucleosome self-association:  dependence on divalent cations and core histone tail domains. Biochemistry 35, 4009–4015 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gordon, F., Luger, K. & Hansen, J. C. The core histone N-terminal tail domains function independently and additively during salt-dependent oligomerization of nucleosomal arrays. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 33701–33706 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Li, S., Aristizabal, M. J., Grigoryev, S. A. & Panchenko, A. R. Molecular dynamics-guided all-atom reconstruction of cryo-ET maps reveals mechanisms of histone tail-mediated chromatin compaction. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.05.686627 (2025).

  54. Farcaș, A.-A. & Bende, A. In Adv. Quantum Chem. Vol. 81, 269–290 (Elsevier, 2020).

  55. Ong, M. S., Vasudevan, D. & Davey, C. A. Divalent metal- and high mobility group N protein-dependent nucleosome stability and conformation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 143890 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Liang, Q. & Dedon, P. C. Cu(II)/H2O2-induced DNA damage is enhanced by packaging of DNA as a nucleosome. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 14, 416–422 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Gibney, A. et al. A click chemistry-based artificial metallo-nuclease. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 62, e202305759 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Gelagutashvili, E. S., Sigua, K. I. & Sapojnikova, N. A. Binding and the nature of Cu(II) ion interaction with nucleosomes. J. Inorg. Biochem. 70, 207–210 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Govindaraju, M. et al. Copper interactions with DNA of chromatin and its role in neurodegenerative disorders. J. Pharm. Anal. 3, 354–359 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Li, S., Olson, W. K. & Lu, X. J. Web 3DNA 2.0 for the analysis, visualization, and modeling of 3D nucleic acid structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W26–W34 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Fuchs, H. A. et al. G34R cancer mutation alters the conformational ensemble and dynamics of the histone H3.3 tails. Nucleic Acids Res. 54, gkaf1381 (2026).

  62. Maier, J. A. et al. ff14SB: improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 3696–3713 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Galindo-Murillo, R. et al. Assessing the current state of amber force field modifications for DNA. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 12, 4114–4127 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Li, S., Wei, T. & Panchenko, A. R. Histone variant H2A.Z modulates nucleosome dynamics to promote DNA accessibility. Nat. Commun. 14, 769 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Li, S., Peng, Y., Landsman, D. & Panchenko, A. R. DNA methylation cues in nucleosome geometry, stability and unwrapping. Nucleic Acids Res 50, 1864–1874 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Kohestani, H. & Wereszczynski, J. Effects of H2A.B incorporation on nucleosome structures and dynamics. Biophys. J. 120, 1498–1509 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Rabdano, S. O. et al. Histone H4 tails in nucleosomes: a fuzzy interaction with DNA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 60, 6480–6487 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Horn, H. W. et al. Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-Ew. J. Chem. Phys. 120, 9665–9678 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Li, P., Song, L. F. & Merz, K. M. Jr. Systematic parameterization of monovalent ions employing the nonbonded model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 1645–1657 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Li, P., Roberts, B. P., Chakravorty, D. K. & Merz, K. M. Jr. Rational design of particle mesh Ewald compatible Lennard-Jones parameters for +2 metal cations in explicit solvent. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 2733–2748 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Li, P. & Merz, K. M. Jr. Taking into account the ion-induced dipole interaction in the nonbonded model of ions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 289–297 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Li, P., Song, L. F. & Merz, K. M. Jr. Parameterization of highly charged metal ions using the 12-6-4 LJ-type nonbonded model in explicit water. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 883–895 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Kantakevičius, P., Mathiah, C., Johannissen, L. O. & Hay, S. Chelator-based parameterization of the 12-6-4 Lennard-Jones molecular mechanics potential for more realistic metal ion-protein interactions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18, 2367–2374 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Panteva, M. T., Giambasu, G. M. & York, D. M. Force field for Mg2+, Mn2+, Zn2+, and Cd2+ ions that have balanced interactions with nucleic acids. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 15460–15470 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Schwartz, E. A. et al. RNA targeting and cleavage by the type III-Dv CRISPR effector complex. Nat. Commun. 15, 3324 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Zhang, J., Fakharzadeh, A., Pan, F., Roland, C. & Sagui, C. Atypical structures of GAA/TTC trinucleotide repeats underlying Friedreich’s ataxia: DNA triplexes and RNA/DNA hybrids. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 9899–9917 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Song, L. F., Sengupta, A. & Merz, K. M. Jr. Thermodynamics of transition metal ion binding to proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 6365–6374 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Cruz-León, S. & Schwierz, N. RNA captures more cations than DNA: insights from molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 126, 8646–8654 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Salomon-Ferrer, R., Case, D. A. & Walker, R. C. An overview of the Amber biomolecular simulation package. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 3, 198–210 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Turq, P., Lantelme, F. & Friedman, H. L. Brownian dynamics: its application to ionic solutions. J. Chem. Phys. 66, 3039–3044 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., van Gunsteren, W. F., DiNola, A. & Haak, J. R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684–3690 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Essmann, U. et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577–8593 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Ryckaert, J.-P., Ciccotti, G. & Berendsen, H. J. C. Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 23, 327–341 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Grant, B. J., Rodrigues, A. P., ElSawy, K. M., McCammon, J. A. & Caves, L. S. Bio3d: an R package for the comparative analysis of protein structures. Bioinformatics 22, 2695–2696 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Pitman, M., Dalal, Y. & Papoian, G. A. Minimal cylinder analysis reveals the mechanical properties of oncogenic nucleosomes. Biophys. J. 118, 2309–2318 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Ahadi, A., Johansson, D. & Evilevitch, A. Modeling and simulation of the mechanical response from nanoindentation test of DNA-filled viral capsids. J. Biol. Phys. 39, 183–199 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Li, L. et al. DelPhiForce web server: electrostatic forces and energy calculations and visualization. Bioinformatics 33, 3661–3663 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Hu, G. Y. Peng selective binding of divalent cations reshapes nucleosome mechanics and unlocks histone tail dynamics. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18232757.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12205112), the Natural Science Foundation of Wuhan (No. 2024040801020302) and the self-determined research funds of CCNU from the colleges’ basic research and operation of MOE (CCNU25JC005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Biophysics and Department of Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China

    Guanhua Hu, Houfang Zhang, Wang Xu, Gege Liu & Yunhui Peng

Authors
  1. Guanhua Hu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Houfang Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wang Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gege Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yunhui Peng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.H.P. conceived and designed the research, performed simulations, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, and acquired funding. G.H.H. performed simulations, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. W.X., G.G.L., and H.F.Z. contributed to data analysis and interpretation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunhui Peng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks Mateusz Kogut, Damien Thompson and Stephanie Portillo-Ledesma for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Michal Kolar and Laura Rodríguez Pérez.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information PDF

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Movie 1

Supplementary Movie 2

Supplementary Movie 3

Supplementary Movie 4

Supplementary Movie 5

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, G., Zhang, H., Xu, W. et al. Selective binding of divalent cations reshapes nucleosome mechanics and unlocks histone tail dynamics. Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09648-1

Download citation

  • Received: 15 September 2025

  • Accepted: 26 January 2026

  • Published: 05 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09648-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Aims & Scope

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Biology (Commun Biol)

ISSN 2399-3642 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing