Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Biology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications biology
  3. articles
  4. article
Pathological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 variants and immune responses induced in a COVID-19 macaque model
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 February 2026

Pathological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 variants and immune responses induced in a COVID-19 macaque model

  • Emiko Urano1,
  • Tomotaka Okamura1,
  • Mahoko Higuchi1,
  • Mugi Furukawa1,
  • Kayoko Ueda1,
  • Satoshi Nagata  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9156-52152,
  • Haruhiko Kamada3 &
  • …
  • Yasuhiro Yasutomi  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8252-14481,4,5 

Communications Biology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 997 Accesses

  • 7 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Viral infection

Abstract

Although recent studies have suggested that the Omicron strain is less severe, the prevalence of long Omicron variants and their subvariant waves continues today. Here, we analyze the pathological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 variants in cynomolgus macaques. Prolonged re-challenge analysis results in the establishment of re-infection in some macaques with both the same strain and different strains. Omicron infection shows low pathogenicity; however, all macaques that developed pneumonia were inoculated with Omicron strains at the second inoculation. Interestingly, antibodies against the Wuhan, Alpha, and Delta strains are strongly induced regardless of the strain, but antibodies against Omicron strains are not. Moreover, despite the re-infection strain, antibody levels against the Wuhan strain are highest, suggesting original antigenic sin. In addition, Omicron infection induces weaker antigen-specific T-cell responses. These results indicate that immune responses to viral infection differ between the variants, and these differences could inform vaccine development strategies.

Similar content being viewed by others

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: recent progress and future perspectives

Article Open access 28 April 2022

Plasma metabolomic characterization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection

Article Open access 19 April 2023

Attenuated replication and pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 Omicron

Article 21 January 2022

Data availability

All data associated with this study are in the paper or the Supplementary Materials and Supplementary Data 1–3. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Organization W. H. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Weekly Epidemiological Updates and Monthly Operational Updates. (2023).

  2. Chandrashekar, A. et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection protects against rechallenge in rhesus macaques. Science 369, 812–817 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Facciuolo, A. et al. Longitudinal analysis of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection reveals distinct kinetics and emergence of cross-neutralizing antibodies to variants of concern. Front. Microbiol. 14, 1148255 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deng, W. et al. Primary exposure to SARS-CoV-2 protects against reinfection in rhesus macaques. Science 369, 818–823 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Urano, E. et al. COVID-19 cynomolgus macaque model reflecting human COVID-19 pathological conditions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2104847118 (2021).

  6. Kuhlmann, C. et al. Breakthrough infections with SARS-CoV-2 omicron despite mRNA vaccine booster dose. Lancet 399, 625–626 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cele, S. et al. Omicron extensively but incompletely escapes Pfizer BNT162b2 neutralization. Nature 602, 654–656 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. England, P. H. Investigation of novel SARS-COV-2 variant: variant of Concern 202012/01. (2020).

  9. Davies, N. G. et al. Estimated transmissibility and impact of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England. Science 372 (2021).

  10. Davies, N. G. et al. Increased mortality in community-tested cases of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7. Nature 593, 270–274 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tegally, H. et al. Detection of a SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern in South Africa. Nature 592, 438–443 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Faria, N. R. et al. Genomics and epidemiology of the P.1 SARS-CoV-2 lineage in Manaus, Brazil. Science 372, 815–821 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Singh, J., Rahman, S. A., Ehtesham, N. Z., Hira, S. & Hasnain, S. E. SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern are emerging in India. Nat. Med. 27, 1131–1133 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dhar, M. S. et al. Genomic characterization and epidemiology of an emerging SARS-CoV-2 variant in Delhi, India. Science 374, 995–999 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Twohig, K. A. et al. Hospital admission and emergency care attendance risk for SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) compared with alpha (B.1.1.7) variants of concern: a cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 22, 35–42 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deng, X. et al. Transmission, infectivity, and neutralization of a spike L452R SARS-CoV-2 variant. Cell 184, 3426–3437.e3428 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saito, A. et al. Enhanced fusogenicity and pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Delta P681R mutation. Nature 602, 300–306 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Viana, R. et al. Rapid epidemic expansion of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in southern Africa. Nature 603, 679–686 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lewnard, J. A. et al. Clinical outcomes associated with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant and BA.1/BA.1.1 or BA.2 subvariant infection in Southern California. Nat. Med. 28, 1933–1943 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meng, B. et al. Altered TMPRSS2 usage by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron impacts infectivity and fusogenicity. Nature 603, 706–714 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Halfmann, P. J. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron virus causes attenuated disease in mice and hamsters. Nature 603, 687–692 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Organization W. H. Updated working definitions and primary actions for SARS-CoV-2 variants, 4 (2023).

  23. Imai, M. et al. Efficacy of antiviral agents against Omicron subvariants BQ.1.1 and XBB. N. Engl. J. Med. 388, 89–91 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tegally, H. et al. Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron lineages BA.4 and BA.5 in South Africa. Nat. Med. 28, 1785–1790 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yang, S. et al. Fast evolution of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 to JN.1 under heavy immune pressure. Lancet Infect. Dis. 24, e70–e72 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Radhakrishnan, N. et al. Comparison of the clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (B.1.1.529) infected patients from a single hospitalist service. BMC Infect. Dis. 23, 747 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Uraki, R. et al. Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 isolates in rodents. Nature 612, 540–545 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Uraki, R. et al. Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2.75 clinical isolates. Nat. Commun. 14, 1620 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mohandas, S. et al. Comparative pathogenicity of BA.2.12, BA.5.2 and XBB.1 with the Delta variant in Syrian hamsters. Front. Microbiol. 14, 1183763 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Martins, M. et al. The Omicron Variant BA.1.1 presents a lower pathogenicity than B.1 D614G and delta variants in a feline model of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. J. Virol. 96, e0096122 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chen, R. E. et al. Resistance of SARS-CoV-2 variants to neutralization by monoclonal and serum-derived polyclonal antibodies. Nat. Med. 27, 717–726 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, Q. et al. Alarming antibody evasion properties of rising SARS-CoV-2 BQ and XBB subvariants. Cell 186, 279–286.e278 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Reynolds, C. J. et al. Immune boosting by B.1.1.529 (Omicron) depends on previous SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Science 377, eabq1841 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Liu, C. et al. Reduced neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617 by vaccine and convalescent serum. Cell 184, 4220–4236.e4213 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Halfmann, P. J. et al. Transmission and re-infection of Omicron variant XBB.1.5 in hamsters. EBioMedicine 93, 104677 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhou, J. et al. Omicron breakthrough infections in vaccinated or previously infected hamsters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2308655120 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Okamura, T. et al. Simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac239 infection and simian human immunodeficiency virus SHIV89.6P infection result in progression to AIDS in cynomolgus macaques of Asian origin. J. Gen. Virol. 97, 3413–3426 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Urano, E., Okamura, T., Kamitani, W., Kawaoka, Y. & Yasutomi, Y. Comparison of young and elderly COVID-19 cynomolgus macaque models reflecting human COVID-19 pathological conditions. Transl. Regul. Sci. 4, 20–24 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Urano, E. et al. Establishment of a cynomolgus macaque model of human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) infection by direct inoculation of adult T-cell leukemia patient-derived cell lines for HTLV-1 infection. J. Virol. 96, e0133922 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tsujimura, Y. et al. Vaccination with intradermal Bacillus Calmette–Guérin provides robust protection against extrapulmonary tuberculosis but not pulmonary infection in cynomolgus macaques. J. Immunol. 205, 3023–3036 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Francis, T. On the doctrine of original antigenic sin. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 104, 572–578 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  42. de, F. azekas & Webster, S.tG. Disquisitions of Original Antigenic Sin. I. Evidence in man. I. J. Exp. Med. 124, 331–345 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  43. de, F. azekas & Webster, S.tG. Disquisitions of Original Antigenic Sin. I. Evidence in man. J. Exp. Med. 124, 347–361 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Munster, V. J. et al. Respiratory disease in Rhesus macaques inoculated with SARS-CoV-2. Nature 585, 268–272 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yu, P. et al. Age-related Rhesus macaque models of COVID-19. Anim. Model. Exp. Med. 3, 93–97 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hartman, A. L. et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection of African green monkeys results in mild respiratory disease discernible by PET/CT imaging and shedding of infectious virus from both respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts. PLOS Pathog. 16, e1008903 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Blair, R. V. et al. Acute respiratory distress in aged, SARS-CoV-2-infected African green monkeys but not Rhesus macaques. Am. J. Pathol. 191, 274–282 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Killingley, B. et al. Safety, tolerability and viral kinetics during SARS-CoV-2 human challenge in young adults. Nat. Med. 28, 1031–1041 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Palmer, C. S. et al. Non-human primate model of long-COVID identifies immune associates of hyperglycemia. Nat. Commun. 15, 6664 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mlcochova, P. et al. SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 Delta variant replication and immune evasion. Nature 599, 114–119 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang, J. et al. Membrane fusion and immune evasion by the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant. Science 374, 1353–1360 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Shuai, H. et al. Attenuated replication and pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 Omicron. Nature 603, 693–699 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hui, K. P. Y. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant replication in human bronchus and lung ex vivo. Nature 603, 715–720 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Trunfio, M. et al. Real-life evidence of lower lung virulence in COVID-19 inpatients infected with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant compared to wild-type and delta SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Lung 200, 573–577 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  55. van Doremalen, N. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 are attenuated in Rhesus macaques as compared to Delta. Sci. Adv. 8, eade1860 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Jacob-Dolan, C. et al. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of GBP510/AS03 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 delta challenge in Rhesus macaques. NPJ Vaccines 8, 23 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Urano, E. et al. An inhaled ACE2 decoy confers protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in preclinical models. Sci. Transl. Med. 15, eadi2623 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Rosenke, K. et al. Combined molnupiravir-nirmatrelvir treatment improves the inhibitory effect on SARS-CoV-2 in macaques. JCI Insight 8, e166485 (2023).

  59. Gagne, M. et al. Protection from SARS-CoV-2 Delta one year after mRNA-1273 vaccination in rhesus macaques coincides with anamnestic antibody response in the lung. Cell 185, 113–130.e115 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sette, A. & Crotty, S. Adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Cell 184, 861–880 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Cromer, D. et al. Prospects for durable immune control of SARS-CoV-2 and prevention of reinfection. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 21, 395–404 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Chandrashekar, A. et al. Prior infection with SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020 partially protects rhesus macaques against reinfection with B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants. Sci. Transl. Med. 13, eabj2641 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Chandrashekar, A. et al. Vaccine protection against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in macaques. Cell 185, 1549–1555.e1511 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Deng, W. et al. Sequential immunizations confer cross-protection against variants of SARS-CoV-2, including Omicron in Rhesus macaques. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 7, 124 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Monto, A. S., Malosh, R. E., Petrie, J. G. & Martin, E. T. The Doctrine of original antigenic sin: separating good from evil. J. Infect. Dis. 215, 1782–1788 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Henry, C., Palm, A. E., Krammer, F. & Wilson, P. C. From Original Antigenic Sin to the Universal Influenza Virus Vaccine. Trends Immunol. 39, 70–79 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Evans, J. P. & Liu, S. L. Challenges and prospects in developing future SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: overcoming original antigenic sin and inducing broadly neutralizing antibodies. J. Immunol. 211, 1459–1467 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Schiepers, A. et al. Molecular fate-mapping of serum antibody responses to repeat immunization. Nature 615, 482–489 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Collier, A. Y. et al. Immunogenicity of BA.5 bivalent mRNA vaccine boosters. N. Engl. J. Med. 388, 565–567 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Wang, Q. et al. Antibody response to Omicron BA.4-BA.5 bivalent booster. N. Engl. J. Med. 388, 567–569 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ju, B. et al. Antigenic sin of wild-type SARS-CoV-2 vaccine shapes poor cross-neutralization of BA.4/5/2.75 subvariants in BA.2 breakthrough infections. Nat. Commun. 13, 7120 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Nelson, C. E. et al. Mild SARS-CoV-2 infection in Rhesus macaques is associated with viral control prior to antigen-specific T cell responses in tissues. Sci. Immunol. 7, eabo0535 (2022).

  73. Yu, J. et al. Ad26.COV2.S and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein ferritin nanoparticle vaccine protect against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5 challenge in macaques. Cell Rep. Med. 4, 101018 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Gagne, M. et al. mRNA-1273 or mRNA-Omicron boost in vaccinated macaques elicits similar B cell expansion, neutralizing responses, and protection from Omicron. Cell 185, 1556–1571.e1518 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Li, L. et al. Immune response and severity of Omicron BA.5 reinfection among individuals previously infected with different SARS-CoV-2 variants. Front Cell Infect. Microbiol 13, 1277880 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Chemaitelly, H. et al. Differential protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection pre- and post-Omicron. Nature 639, 1024–1031 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Brining, D. L. et al. Thoracic radiography as a refinement methodology for the study of H1N1 influenza in cynomologus macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Comp. Med. 60, 389–395 (2010).

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the members and veterinary staff of HAMRI Co., Ltd. and the Corporation for Production and Research of Laboratory Primates for their technical expertise and assistance with animal care and sample processing using cynomolgus macaques. This work was supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED), Research Program on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases under JP20fk0108414 (to E.U., T.O., Y.Y.), JP21fk0108582 (to E.U.), by the AMED Strategic Center of Biomedical Advanced Vaccine Research and Development for Preparedness and Response (SCARDA), Japan Initiative for World-leading Vaccine Research and Development Centers under JP223fa627007 (to E.U., T.O., Y.Y.), JP223fa727002 (to Y.Y.), JP223fa627005 (to Y.Y.), by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Exploratory Research under 21K19395 (to E.U. and Y.Y.), by the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), under JPMJPF2017 (to Y.Y.). We would like to thank S.E.S. Translation and Proofreading Services and Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Immunoregulation and Vaccine Research, Tsukuba Primate Research Center, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

    Emiko Urano, Tomotaka Okamura, Mahoko Higuchi, Mugi Furukawa, Kayoko Ueda & Yasuhiro Yasutomi

  2. Laboratory of Antibody Design, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan

    Satoshi Nagata

  3. Center for Drug Design Research, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan

    Haruhiko Kamada

  4. Institute for Vaccine Research and Development, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

    Yasuhiro Yasutomi

  5. Division of Immunoregulation, Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan

    Yasuhiro Yasutomi

Authors
  1. Emiko Urano
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tomotaka Okamura
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mahoko Higuchi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mugi Furukawa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kayoko Ueda
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Satoshi Nagata
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Haruhiko Kamada
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yasuhiro Yasutomi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

E.U. and Y.Y. designed the experiments. E.U., M.H., M.F., and K.U. performed the virological and the biological assays. T.O. analyzed CT images and veterinary pathology. S.N. and H.K. performed gene cloning and protein purification. E.U. and Y.Y. wrote the paper, and all authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuhiro Yasutomi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Emily Lee and Dario Ummarino. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Supplementary Data 3

Reporting Summary

Transparent Peer Review file

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Urano, E., Okamura, T., Higuchi, M. et al. Pathological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 variants and immune responses induced in a COVID-19 macaque model. Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09684-x

Download citation

  • Received: 21 November 2024

  • Accepted: 30 January 2026

  • Published: 13 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09684-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Aims & Scope

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Biology (Commun Biol)

ISSN 2399-3642 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing