Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Biology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications biology
  3. articles
  4. article
Sex-dependent rescue of memory and synaptic deficits in AD model mice by increasing PSD-95 palmitoylation
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 18 February 2026

Sex-dependent rescue of memory and synaptic deficits in AD model mice by increasing PSD-95 palmitoylation

  • Yixing Du1,
  • Katie Prinkey1,
  • Andrew Q. Pham1 na1,
  • Amber Lawrence1 na1,
  • Celeste Morales1 na1,
  • Maureen Dinata1 na1,
  • Marlenne Gutierrez1 na1,
  • Ahmed Khalil  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9384-83901 na1,
  • Medha Sharma2,
  • Robert A. Rissman3,
  • Mehreen Manikkoth1,
  • Ian Baick1,
  • Haritha Karthikeyan1 &
  • …
  • Kim Dore  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6263-367X1 

Communications Biology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1707 Accesses

  • 7 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Cellular neuroscience

Abstract

PSD-95, a major scaffolding protein, requires palmitoylation to remain at synapses where it plays critical roles in synaptic structure and function. Here, we show that PSD-95 palmitoylation is specifically reduced in the hippocampus of female Alzheimer’s disease (AD) model mice. Accordingly, these mice have significant memory deficits that are not observed in male AD model mice. Systemic injections of Palmostatin B, a depalmitoylating enzyme inhibitor (including the one acting on PSD-95), rescues memory deficits in female AD model mice and restores PSD-95 palmitoylation levels. Importantly, both synaptic structure and function are impaired in female AD model mice, and these deficits are normalized in Palmostatin B injected animals. This drug has no effects on amyloid plaques or GFAP levels, indicating that the rescue of behavioral and synaptic deficits is not due to effects on plaque or astrogliosis related AD pathology. Our data instead suggest that the sex-dependent rescue we observe is mediated by the stabilization of small, vulnerable dendritic spines. This study demonstrates that increasing PSD-95 palmitoylation might be an effective way to protect synapses from AD pathology and therefore a promising therapy for AD.

Similar content being viewed by others

Executive dysfunction is associated with altered hippocampal-prefrontal functional connectivity in 3xTg Alzheimer’s model mice

Article Open access 06 August 2025

Solid-phase synthesis and pathological evaluation of pyroglutamate amyloid-β3-42 peptide

Article Open access 10 January 2023

Synaptic proteasome is inhibited in Alzheimer’s disease models and associates with memory impairment in mice

Article Open access 07 November 2023

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information and Supplementary Data files (all numerical Source data for graphs shown in the main Figures can be found in Supplementary Data 1–3). All other data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Material requests should be sent to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Lopez-Lee, C., Torres, E. R. S., Carling, G. & Gan, L. Mechanisms of sex differences in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 112, 1208–1221 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Koran, M. E. I., Wagener, M. & Hohman, T. J. & for the Alzheimer’s Neuroimaging Initiative. Sex differences in the association between AD biomarkers and cognitive decline. Brain Imaging Behav. 11, 205–213 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Inguanzo, A. et al. Atrophy trajectories in Alzheimer’s disease: how sex matters. Alzheimer's Res. Ther. 17, 79 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moutinho, S. Women twice as likely to develop Alzheimer’s disease as men—but scientists do not know why. Nat. Med. 31, 704–707 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jack, C. R. et al. Age, sex, and APOE ε4 effects on memory, brain structure, and β-amyloid across the adult life span. JAMA Neurol. 72, 511 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mifflin, M. A. et al. Sex differences in the IntelliCage and the Morris water maze in the APP/PS1 mouse model of amyloidosis. Neurobiol. Aging 101, 130–140 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robertson, K. V. et al. Knockdown of microglial iron import gene, Slc11a2, worsens cognitive function and alters microglial transcriptional landscape in a sex-specific manner in the APP/PS1 model of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neuroinflammation 21, 238 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, C. et al. Corticotropin-releasing factor receptor-1 antagonism mitigates beta amyloid pathology and cognitive and synaptic deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. 12, 527–537 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brandt, N., Löffler, T., Fester, L. & Rune, G. M. Sex-specific features of spine densities in the hippocampus. Sci. Rep. 10, 11405 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jabra, S. et al. Sex- and cycle-dependent changes in spine density and size in hippocampal CA2 neurons. Sci. Rep. 14, 12252 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. DeKosky, S. T. & Scheff, S. W. Synapse loss in frontal cortex biopsies in Alzheimer’s disease: correlation with cognitive severity. Ann. Neurol. 27, 457–464 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Selkoe, D. J. Alzheimer’s disease is a synaptic failure. Science 298, 789–791 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boros, B. D. et al. Dendritic spines provide cognitive resilience against Alzheimer’s disease. Ann. Neurol. 82, 602–614 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gylys, K. H. et al. Synaptic changes in Alzheimer’s disease: increased amyloid-beta and gliosis in surviving terminals is accompanied by decreased PSD-95 fluorescence. Am. J. Pathol. 165, 1809–1817 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Inestrosa, N. C. et al. Tetrahydrohyperforin prevents cognitive deficit, Aβ deposition, tau phosphorylation and synaptotoxicity in the APPswe/PSEN1ΔE9 model of Alzheimer’s disease: a possible effect on APP processing. Transl. Psychiatry 1, e20 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shao, C. Y., Mirra, S. S., Sait, H. B. R., Sacktor, T. C. & Sigurdsson, E. M. Postsynaptic degeneration as revealed by PSD-95 reduction occurs after advanced Aβ and tau pathology in transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 122, 285–292 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hong, J. Y. et al. High-throughput enzyme assay for screening inhibitors of the ZDHHC3/7/20 acyltransferases. ACS Chem. Biol. 16, 1318–1324 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Almeida, C. G. et al. Beta-amyloid accumulation in APP mutant neurons reduces PSD-95 and GluR1 in synapses. Neurobiol. Dis. 20, 187–198 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Scheff, S. W., Ansari, M. A. & Mufson, E. J. Oxidative stress and hippocampal synaptic protein levels in elderly cognitively intact individuals with Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Neurobiol. Aging 42, 1–12 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pham, E. et al. Progressive accumulation of amyloid-β oligomers in Alzheimer’s disease and APP transgenic mice is accompanied by selective alterations in synaptic scaffold proteins. FEBS J. 277, 3051–3067 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  21. El-Husseini, A. E. et al. Dual palmitoylation of PSD-95 mediates its vesiculotubular sorting, postsynaptic targeting, and ion channel clustering. J. Cell Biol. 148, 159–172 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Won, S. J., Cheung See Kit, M. & Martin, B. R. Protein depalmitoylases. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 53, 83–98 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fujimoto, T. et al. P-selectin is acylated with palmitic acid and stearic acid at cysteine 766 through a thioester linkage. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 11394–11400 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yokoi, N. et al. Identification of PSD-95 depalmitoylating enzymes. J. Neurosci. 36, 6431–6444 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sanders, S. S. et al. Curation of the mammalian palmitoylome indicates a pivotal role for palmitoylation in diseases and disorders of the nervous system and cancers. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004405 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Petropavlovskiy, A. A., Kogut, J. A., Leekha, A., Townsend, C. A. & Sanders, S. S. A sticky situation: regulation and function of protein palmitoylation with a spotlight on the axon and axon initial segment. Neuronal Signal 5, NS20210005 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. El-Husseini, A. E.-D. et al. Synaptic strength regulated by palmitate cycling on PSD-95. Cell 108, 849–863 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schnell, E. et al. Direct interactions between PSD-95 and stargazin control synaptic AMPA receptor number. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 13902–13907 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bats, C., Groc, L. & Choquet, D. The interaction between stargazin and PSD-95 regulates AMPA receptor surface trafficking. Neuron 53, 719–734 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jeyifous, O. et al. Palmitoylation regulates glutamate receptor distributions in postsynaptic densities through control of PSD95 conformation and orientation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 113, E8482–E8491 (2016).

  31. Chowdhury, D. & Hell, J. W. Ca2+/calmodulin binding to PSD-95 downregulates its palmitoylation and AMPARs in long-term depression. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 11, 6 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shen, Z.-C. et al. APT1-mediated depalmitoylation regulates hippocampal synaptic plasticity. J. Neurosci. 42, 2662–2677 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mao, S., Zhao, X., Wang, L., Man, Y. & Li, K. Palmitoylation-related gene ZDHHC22 as a potential diagnostic and immunomodulatory target in Alzheimer’s disease: insights from machine learning analyses and WGCNA. Eur. J. Med. Res. 30, 46 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lin, D. T. & Conibear, E. ABHD17 proteins are novel protein depalmitoylases that regulate N-Ras palmitate turnover and subcellular localization. Elife 4, e11306 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dore, K. et al. PSD-95 protects synapses from β-amyloid. Cell Rep. 35, 109194 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chen, S. et al. Palmitoylation-dependent activation of MC1R prevents melanomagenesis. Nature 549, 399–403 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Martin, B. R., Wang, C., Adibekian, A., Tully, S. E. & Cravatt, B. F. Global profiling of dynamic protein palmitoylation. Nat. Methods 9, 84–89 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pavon, M. V., Navakkode, S., Wong, L.-W. & Sajikumar, S. Inhibition of nogo-A rescues synaptic plasticity and associativity in APP/PS1 animal model of Alzheimer’s disease. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 139, 111–120 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Viana da Silva, S. et al. Early synaptic deficits in the APP/PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease involve neuronal adenosine A2A receptors. Nat. Commun. 7, 11915 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Moolman, D. L., Vitolo, O. V., Vonsattel, J.-P. G. & Shelanski, M. L. Dendrite and dendritic spine alterations in alzheimer models. J. Neurocytol. 33, 377–387 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Knafo, S. et al. Widespread changes in dendritic spines in a model of Alzheimer’s disease. Cereb. Cortex 19, 586–592 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Chai, G., Wang, Y., Zhu, D., Yasheng, A. & Zhao, P. Activation of β2-adrenergic receptor promotes dendrite ramification and spine generation in APP/PS1 mice. Neurosci. Lett. 636, 158–164 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Xu, L. et al. Deficits in N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor function and synaptic plasticity in hippocampal CA1 in APP/PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 13, 772980 (2021).

  44. Yook, Y. et al. Hyperfunction of post-synaptic density protein 95 promotes seizure response in early-stage aβ pathology. EMBO Rep. 25, 1233–1255 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kanadome, T., Yokoi, N., Fukata, Y. & Fukata, M. Systematic screening of depalmitoylating enzymes and evaluation of their activities by the acyl-PEGyl exchange gel-shift (APEGS) assay. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009, 83–98 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jiao, S.-S. et al. Sex dimorphism profile of Alzheimer’s disease-type pathologies in an APP/PS1 mouse model. Neurotox. Res. 29, 256–266 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wang, J., Tanila, H., Puoliväli, J., Kadish, I. & van. Groen, T. Gender differences in the amount and deposition of amyloidβ in APPswe and PS1 double transgenic mice. Neurobiol. Dis. 14, 318–327 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jia, Y., Du, X., Wang, Y., Song, Q. & He, L. Sex differences in luteinizing hormone aggravates Aβ deposition in APP/PS1 and Aβ1-42-induced mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Pharm. 970, 176485 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Curdt, N. et al. Search strategy analysis of Tg4-42 Alzheimer mice in the Morris water maze reveals early spatial navigation deficits. Sci. Rep. 12, 5451 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Spencer, B. et al. Anti-α-synuclein immunotherapy reduces α-synuclein propagation in the axon and degeneration in a combined viral vector and transgenic model of synucleinopathy. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 5, 7 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Huang, X. et al. S-acylation of p62 promotes p62 droplet recruitment into autophagosomes in mammalian autophagy. Mol. Cell 83, 3485–3501 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Martínez-Martos, J. M. et al. Sexual and metabolic differences in hippocampal evolution: Alzheimer’s disease implications. Life 14, 1547 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kamenetz, F. et al. APP processing and synaptic function. Neuron 37, 925–937 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rostagno, A., Cabrera, E., Lashley, T. & Ghiso, J. N-terminally truncated Aβ4-x proteoforms and their relevance for Alzheimer’s pathophysiology. Transl. Neurodegener. 11, 30 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Liu, W. et al. Chemical genetic activation of the cholinergic basal forebrain hippocampal circuit rescues memory loss in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s. Res. Ther. 14, 53 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Cai, Z., Wan, C.-Q. & Liu, Z. Astrocyte and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurol. 264, 2068–2074 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kraft, A. W. et al. Attenuating astrocyte activation accelerates plaque pathogenesis in APP/PS1 mice. FASEB J. 27, 187–198 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Shi, Q. et al. Complement C3 deficiency protects against neurodegeneration in aged plaque-rich APP/PS1 mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaaf6295 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Carter, S. F. et al. Astrocyte biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Mol. Med. 25, 77–95 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kim, J. & Tsien, R. W. Synapse-specific adaptations to inactivity in hippocampal circuits achieve homeostatic gain control while dampening network reverberation. Neuron 58, 925–937 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Fernández-Pérez, E. J. et al. Changes in neuronal excitability and synaptic transmission in nucleus accumbens in a transgenic Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Sci. Rep. 10, 19606 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Latif-Hernandez, A. et al. The two faces of synaptic failure in AppNL-G-F knock-in mice. Alzheimer’s. Res. Ther. 12, 100 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Back, M. K., Ruggieri, S., Jacobi, E. & Von Engelhardt, J. Amyloid beta-mediated changes in synaptic function and spine number of neocortical neurons depend on NMDA receptors. IJMS 22, 6298 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Liu, G., Choi, S. & Tsien, R. W. Variability of neurotransmitter concentration and nonsaturation of postsynaptic AMPA receptors at synapses in hippocampal cultures and slices. Neuron 22, 395–409 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Li, H., Cao, J. & Xu, L. Amplitude/frequency of spontaneous mEPSC correlates to the degree of long-term depression in the CA1 region of the hippocampal slice. Brain Res. 1050, 110–117 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Sala, C. et al. Regulation of dendritic spine morphology and synaptic function by Shank and Homer. Neuron 31, 115–130 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Peng, Y.-R. et al. Coordinated changes in dendritic arborization and synaptic strength during neural circuit development. Neuron 61, 71–84 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Booker, S. A. et al. Altered dendritic spine function and integration in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Nat. Commun. 10, 4813 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Medel Sánchez, A. et al. Aducanumab in Alzheimer’s disease: a comparative study of its effects on dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Cureus 16, e75907 (2024).

  70. Stern, Y. Cognitive reserve in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 11, 1006–1012 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Valenzuela, M. J. & Sachdev, P. Brain reserve and dementia: a systematic review. Psychol. Med. 36, 441–454 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Zaręba-Kozioł, M. et al. S-Palmitoylation of synaptic proteins as a novel mechanism underlying sex-dependent differences in neuronal plasticity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 6253 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Li, R. & Singh, M. Sex differences in cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 35, 385–403 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Shankar, G. M. et al. Natural oligomers of the Alzheimer amyloid-beta protein induce reversible synapse loss by modulating an NMDA-type glutamate receptor-dependent signaling pathway. J. Neurosci. 27, 2866–2875 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Goode, L. K. et al. Examination of diurnal variation and sex differences in hippocampal neurophysiology and spatial memory. eNeuro 9, ENEURO.0124-22.2022 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Le, A. A. et al. Metabotropic NMDAR signaling contributes to sex differences in synaptic plasticity and episodic memory. J. Neurosci. 44, e0438242024 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Narattil, N. R. & Maroun, M. Differential role of NMDA receptors in hippocampal-dependent spatial memory and plasticity in juvenile male and female rats. Hippocampus 34, 564–574 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Maffioli, E. et al. Insulin and serine metabolism as sex-specific hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease in the human hippocampus. Cell Rep. 40, 111271 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Bhattacharyya, R., Barren, C. & Kovacs, D. M. Palmitoylation of amyloid precursor protein regulates amyloidogenic processing in lipid rafts. J. Neurosci. 33, 11169–11183 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Andrew, R. J. et al. Lack of BACE1 S-palmitoylation reduces amyloid burden and mitigates memory deficits in transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, E9665–E9674 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Natale, F. et al. Inhibition of zDHHC7-driven protein S-palmitoylation prevents cognitive deficits in an experimental model of Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2402604121 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Koster, K. P. et al. Loss of depalmitoylation disrupts homeostatic plasticity of AMPARs in a mouse model of infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. J. Neurosci. 43, 8317–8335 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Puhl, A. C. et al. Identification of new modulators and inhibitors of palmitoyl-protein thioesterase 1 for CLN1 Batten disease and cancer. ACS Omega 9, 11870–11882 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Fukata, Y. et al. Local palmitoylation cycles define activity-regulated postsynaptic subdomains. J. Cell Biol. 202, 145–161 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Xu, B. et al. Loss of thin spines and small synapses contributes to defective hippocampal function in aged mice. Neurobiol. Aging 71, 91–104 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Dumitriu, D. et al. Selective changes in thin spine density and morphology in monkey prefrontal cortex correlate with aging-related cognitive impairment. J. Neurosci. 30, 7507–7515 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Jankowsky, J. L. et al. APP processing and amyloid deposition in mice haplo-insufficient for presenilin 1. Neurobiol. Aging 25, 885–892 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Vorhees, C. V. & Williams, M. T. Morris water maze: procedures for assessing spatial and related forms of learning and memory. Nat. Protoc. 1, 848–858 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Quehenberger, O. et al. Lipidomics reveals a remarkable diversity of lipids in human plasma. J. Lipid Res. 51, 3299–3305 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Ting, J. T., Daigle, T. L., Chen, Q. & Feng, G. Acute brain slice methods for adult and aging animals: application of targeted patch clamp analysis and optogenetics. Methods Mol. Biol. 1183, 221–242 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Jazmin Florio and Michael Mante for behavioral testing training and help with tissue harvesting. We thank the late Dr. Eric Smeltz for giving Ahmed Khalil access to his GC/MS instrument. We also thank Drs. Roberto Malinow, Helmut Kessels, Christina Sigurdson and Alexandra Newton for their helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was funded by the National Institute on Aging, grant AG067049 to K.D. We also acknowledge grant P30NS047101 from NINDS, which funds the UCSD School of Medicine Microscopy core.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Andrew Q. Pham, Amber Lawrence, Celeste Morales, Maureen Dinata, Marlenne Gutierrez, Ahmed Khalil.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

    Yixing Du, Katie Prinkey, Andrew Q. Pham, Amber Lawrence, Celeste Morales, Maureen Dinata, Marlenne Gutierrez, Ahmed Khalil, Mehreen Manikkoth, Ian Baick, Haritha Karthikeyan & Kim Dore

  2. Department of Pharmacology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

    Medha Sharma

  3. Alzheimer’s Therapeutic Research Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, San Diego, CA, USA

    Robert A. Rissman

Authors
  1. Yixing Du
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katie Prinkey
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew Q. Pham
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amber Lawrence
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Celeste Morales
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Maureen Dinata
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Marlenne Gutierrez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ahmed Khalil
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Medha Sharma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Robert A. Rissman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Mehreen Manikkoth
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ian Baick
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Haritha Karthikeyan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Kim Dore
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.D. and K.P. performed the main experiments. A.Q.P. and M.D. contributed to electrophysiology data collection and analysis. A.L. did the thioflavin-S and GFAP experiments and contributed to writing the manuscript. C.M., M.D., M.G., and M.S. helped with biochemical experiments. A.K. did all the metabolomics experimentation and analysis. R.R. provided mice and access to Morris water maze equipment. M.M., I.B., and H.K. helped with data analysis and animal work. K.D. and Y.D. designed the research and wrote the manuscript. K.D. also performed behavioral testing, acquired funding and supervised all research. All authors contributed to the finalization of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim Dore.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary handling editors: Christian Wozny and Rosie Bunton-Stasyshyn. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review File

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary File

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Supplementary Data 3

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, Y., Prinkey, K., Pham, A.Q. et al. Sex-dependent rescue of memory and synaptic deficits in AD model mice by increasing PSD-95 palmitoylation. Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09702-y

Download citation

  • Received: 15 May 2025

  • Accepted: 03 February 2026

  • Published: 18 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09702-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Aims & Scope

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Biology (Commun Biol)

ISSN 2399-3642 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing