Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Biology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications biology
  3. articles
  4. article
Single-nucleus RNA sequencing provides insights into the genetic mechanisms underlying reproductive adaptability in Tibetan sheep (Ovis aries)
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 17 February 2026

Single-nucleus RNA sequencing provides insights into the genetic mechanisms underlying reproductive adaptability in Tibetan sheep (Ovis aries)

  • Hui-hui Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5304-17361,2,
  • Tao-tao Li1,2,
  • Deng-pan Li1,2,
  • Zi-long Liu1,2,
  • Chun-hui Wang1,2,
  • Xing-xu Zhao2,
  • Yong-ju Zhao3,
  • Tian-zeng Song4 &
  • …
  • You-ji Ma  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4360-66811,2 

Communications Biology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 514 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cell proliferation
  • Stem-cell niche

Abstract

The Tibetan sheep is an ideal model animal for investigating adaptations to hypoxia and an important livestock species; however, the reproductive mechanisms that characterize its adaptive responses in extreme environments remain poorly understood. In this study, we employ single-nucleus RNA sequencing to characterize the transcriptomic landscape of the Tibetan sheep testis at four key developmental stages: newborn, pre-sexual maturity, and post-sexual maturity to adulthood. We constructed a single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas and identified two distinct subtypes of spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs): quiescent and active. Notably, we observed that pre-sexually mature Sertoli cells exhibit three distinct transcriptional states. Furthermore, we also identified a transitional state Sertoli cell that links immature and mature Sertoli cells. Analysis of testicular intercellular communication networks provides evidence for understanding somatic-germ cell interactions during spermatogenesis. Our study provides a comprehensive atlas of Tibetan sheep testicular development, revealing key insights into the dynamic changes and regulatory mechanisms of spermatogenesis and somatic cell maturation from birth to adulthood. These findings contribute to a detailed understanding of the genetic mechanisms underlying testicular development in Tibetan sheep and offer valuable insights and references for the study and comprehension of reproductive adaptations in other highland male domestic animals.

Similar content being viewed by others

Integration and gene co-expression network analysis of scRNA-seq transcriptomes reveal heterogeneity and key functional genes in human spermatogenesis

Article Open access 27 September 2021

Stress increases sperm respiration and motility in mice and men

Article Open access 11 September 2024

Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals cell landscape following antimony exposure during spermatogenesis in Drosophila testes

Article Open access 09 March 2023

Data availability

Single-nucleus transcriptomic datasets generated in this study are available in the Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) under accession number PRJCA035469. Source data underlying all graphs are provided in Supplementary Data 7. All additional data supporting the findings of this study are provided in Supplementary Data 1–6.

Code availability

Details of publicly available software used in the study are given in the Methods section. No custom code was used in the study.

References

  1. Yang, J. et al. Whole-genome sequencing of native sheep provides insights into rapid adaptations toextreme environments. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 2576–2592 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yan, Z. et al. A time-resolved multi-omics atlas of transcriptional regulation in response to high-altitudehypoxia across whole-body tissues. Nat. Commun. 15, 3970 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Han, B. et al. Multiomics analyses provide new insight into genetic variation of reproductiveadaptability in Tibetan sheep. Mol. Biol. Evol. 41, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msae058 (2024).

  4. Morimoto, H. et al. ROS are required for mouse spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell 12, 774–786 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nishimura, H. & L’Hernault, S. W. Spermatogenesis. Curr. Biol. 27, R988–R994 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guo, J. et al. Single-cell analysis of the developing human testis reveals somatic niche cell specificationand fetal germline stem cell establishment. Cell Stem Cell 28, 764–778 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lord, T., Oatley, M. J. & Oatley, J. M. Testicular architecture is critical for mediation of retinoic acidresponsiveness by undifferentiated spermatogonial subtypes in the mouse. Stem Cell Rep 10, 538–552 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tan, J. H. L. et al. Infertility-causing haploinsufficiency reveals TRIM28/KAP1 requirement inspermatogonia. Stem. Cell Rep. 14, 818–827 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Rooij, D. G. Proliferation and differentiation of spermatogonial stem cells. Reproduction 121, 347–354 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gassei, K., Valli, H. & Orwig, K. E. Whole-mount immunohistochemistry to study spermatogonial stemcells and spermatogenic lineage development in mice, monkeys, and humans. Methods Mol. Biol. 1210, 193–202 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guo, J. et al. The dynamic transcriptional cell atlas of testis development during human puberty. CellStem Cell 26, 262–276 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Green, C. D. et al. A comprehensive roadmap of murine spermatogenesis defined by single-cell RNA-seq. Dev. Cell 46, 651–667 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao, L. et al. Single-cell analysis of developing and azoospermia human testicles reveals central roleof Sertoli cells. Nat. Commun. 11, 5683 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, X. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic and cross-species comparison analyses reveal distinctmolecular changes of porcine testes during puberty. Commun. Biol. 7, 1478 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tian, Y. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing of the Mongolia sheep testis reveals a conserved anddivergent transcriptome landscape of mammalian spermatogenesis. FASEB J. 36, e22348 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yang, H. et al. Characterization of sheep spermatogenesis through single-cell RNA sequencing. FASEB J. 35, e21187 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Su, J. et al. A dynamic transcriptional cell atlas of testes development after birth in Hu sheep. BMC Biol. 23, 78 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mipam, T. et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis and in vitro differentiation of testicular cells revealnovel insights into male sterility of the interspecific hybrid cattle-yak. BMC Genomics 24, 149 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, Y. W. et al. Single-cell analysis identifies critical regulators of spermatogonial development anddifferentiation in cattle-yak bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 107, 7317–7336 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Huang, D. et al. A single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of primate testicular aging reveals exhaustion ofthe spermatogonial stem cell reservoir and loss of Sertoli cell homeostasis. Protein Cell 14, 888–907 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Murat, F. et al. The molecular evolution of spermatogenesis across mammals. Nature 613, 308–316 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat. Methods 16, 1289–1296 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rotta, R., Noack, A. Multilevel local search algorithms for modularity clustering. ACM J. Exp.Algorithmics 16, https://doi.org/10.1145/1963190.1970376 (2011).

  24. van der Maaten, L. J. P. & Hinton, G. E. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res 9, 2579–2605 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, G. et al. Single-cell and spatial transcriptomic investigation reveals the spatiotemporalspecificity of the beta-defensin gene family during mouse sperm maturation. Cell Commun. Signal 22, 267 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chen, Q. et al. CNOT3 is required for male germ cell development and spermatogonial stem cellmaintenance. Development 152, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.204557 (2025).

  27. Griswold, M. D. Spermatogenesis: the commitment to meiosis. Physiol. Rev. 96, 1–17 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ribeiro, J. & Crossan, G. P. GCNA is a histone binding protein required for spermatogonial stem cellmaintenance. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 4791–4813 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sohni, A. et al. The neonatal and adult human testis defined at the single-cell level. Cell Rep. 26, 1501–1517 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Papetti, M. & Augenlicht, L. H. MYBL2, a link between proliferation and differentiation in maturingcolon epithelial cells. J. Cell Physiol. 226, 785–791 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Boheler, K. R. Stem cell pluripotency: a cellular trait that depends on transcription factors, chromatinstate and a checkpoint deficient cell cycle. J. Cell Physiol. 221, 10–17 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shami, A. N. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing of human, macaque, and mouse testes uncoversconserved and divergent features of mammalian spermatogenesis. Dev. Cell 54, 529–547 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hermann, B. P. et al. The Mammalian spermatogenesis single-cell transcriptome, from spermatogonialstem cells to spermatids. Cell Rep. 25, 1650–1667 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Guo, J. et al. The adult human testis transcriptional cell atlas. Cell Res. 28, 1141–1157 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, M. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis reveals sequential cell fate transition duringhuman spermatogenesis. Cell Stem Cell 23, 599–614 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Arnold, K. et al. Sox2+ adult stem and progenitor cells are important for tissue regeneration andsurvival of mice. Cell Stem Cell 9, 317–329 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  37. La, H. M. et al. Identification of dynamic undifferentiated cell states within the male germline. Nat.Commun. 9, 2819 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Adikusuma, F., Pederick, D., McAninch, D., Hughes, J. & Thomas, P. Functional equivalence of theSOX2 and SOX3 transcription factors in the developing mouse brain and testes. Genetics 206, 1495–1503 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Givelet, M. et al. Transcriptional profiling of β-2M(-)SPα-6(+)THY1(+) spermatogonial stem cells inhuman spermatogenesis. Stem. Cell Rep 17, 936–952 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wang, S. et al. scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq reveal that Sertoli cell mediates spermatogenesis disordersthrough stage-specific communications in non-obstructive azoospermia. Elife 13, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.97958 (2025).

  41. Lin, W. et al. Isoform-resolution single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the transcriptional panorama ofadult Baoshan pig testis cells. BMC Genomics 26, 459 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Litchfield, K. et al. Whole-exome sequencing reveals the mutational spectrum of testicular germ celltumours. Nat. Commun. 6, 5973 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ernst, C., Odom, D. T. & Kutter, C. The emergence of piRNAs against transposon invasion to preservemammalian genome integrity. Nat. Commun. 8, 1411 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nie, X. et al. Single-cell analysis of human testis aging and correlation with elevated body mass index. Dev. Cell 57, 1160–1176 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kubota, H. et al. Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and endothelial cells promote self-renewalof rabbit germ cells with spermatogonial stem cell properties. FASEB J. 25, 2604–2614 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lau, X., Munusamy, P., Ng, M. J. & Sangrithi, M. Single-cell RNA sequencing of the cynomolgusmacaque testis reveals conserved transcriptional profiles during mammalian spermatogenesis. Dev.Cell 54, 548–566 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tan, H. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq uncovers dynamic processes orchestrated by RNA-binding proteinDDX43 in chromatin remodeling during spermiogenesis. Nat. Commun. 14, 2499 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Fliegauf, M. et al. Mislocalization of DNAH5 and DNAH9 in respiratory cells from patients with primaryciliary dyskinesia. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 171, 1343–1349 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Su, J. et al. Dosage compensation of the X chromosome during sheep testis development revealed bysingle-cell RNA sequencing. Animals 12, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12172169 (2022).

  50. Whelan, E. C. et al. Single-cell multiomic comparison of mouse and rat spermatogenesis reveals generegulatory networks conserved for over 20 million years. Stem Cell Rep. 20, 102449 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Yi, S. et al. Tcf12, A member of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors, mediates bone marrowmesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation in vitro and in vivo. Stem Cells 35, 386–397 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Takubo, K. et al. Stem cell defects in ATM-deficient undifferentiated spermatogonia through DNAdamage-induced cell-cycle arrest. Cell Stem Cell 2, 170–182 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Unhavaithaya, Y. et al. MILI, a PIWI-interacting RNA-binding protein, is required for germ line stem cellself-renewal and appears to positively regulate translation. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 6507–6519 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wang, X. et al. A homozygous PIWIL2 frameshift variant affects the formation and maintenance ofhuman-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived spermatogonial stem cells and causes Sertoli cell-onlysyndrome. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 13, 480 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Lei, N. et al. Sex-specific differences in mouse DMRT1 expression are both cell type- and stage-dependent during gonad development. Biol. Reprod. 77, 466–475 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Li, C. H. et al. Long-term propagation of tree shrew spermatogonial stem cells in culture andsuccessful generation of transgenic offspring. Cell Res. 27, 241–252 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Law, N. C., Oatley, M. J. & Oatley, J. M. Developmental kinetics and transcriptome dynamics of stemcell specification in the spermatogenic lineage. Nat. Commun. 10, 2787 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Dann, C. T. et al. Spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal requires OCT4, a factor downregulated duringretinoic acid-induced differentiation. Stem Cells 26, 2928–2937 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Buaas, F. W. et al. Plzf is required in adult male germ cells for stem cell self-renewal. Nat. Genet. 36, 647–652 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zhang, T., Oatley, J., Bardwell, V. J. & Zarkower, D. DMRT1 is required for mouse spermatogonial stemcell maintenance and replenishment. PLoS Genet 12, e1006293 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Suzuki, H. et al. SOHLH1 and SOHLH2 coordinate spermatogonial differentiation. Dev. Biol. 361, 301–312 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Li, Z. et al. Transcriptional priming as a conserved mechanism of lineage diversification in thedeveloping mouse and human neocortex. Sci. Adv. 6, eabd2068 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Delile, J. et al. Single cell transcriptomics reveals spatial and temporal dynamics of gene expression inthe developing mouse spinal cord. Development 146, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.173807 (2019).

  64. Valli, H. et al. Fluorescence- and magnetic-activated cell sorting strategies to isolate and enrichhuman spermatogonial stem cells. Fertil. Steril. 102, 566–580 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Bardot, E. et al. Foxa2 identifies a cardiac progenitor population with ventricular differentiationpotential. Nat. Commun. 8, 14428 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Lord, T. & Nixon, B. Metabolic changes accompanying spermatogonial stem cell differentiation. Dev.Cell 52, 399–411 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Suzuki, S., McCarrey, J. R. & Hermann, B. P. An mTORC1-dependent switch orchestrates the transitionbetween mouse spermatogonial stem cells and clones of progenitor spermatogonia. Cell Rep 34, 108752 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Hyakutake, K. et al. Asymmetrical allocation of JAK1 mRNA during spermatogonial stem cell division inXenopus laevis. Dev. Growth Differ. 57, 389–399 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Wang, H. Q. et al. Meiotic transcriptional reprogramming mediated by cell-cell communications inhumans and mice revealed by scATAC-seq and scRNA-seq. Zool. Res. 45, 601–616 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Di Persio, S. & Neuhaus, N. Human spermatogonial stem cells and their niche in male (in) fertility:novel concepts from single-cell RNA-sequencing. Hum. Reprod. 38, 1–13 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Handel, M. A. & Schimenti, J. C. Genetics of mammalian meiosis: regulation, dynamics and impact onfertility. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 124–136 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Suzuki, S., Diaz, V. D. & Hermann, B. P. What has single-cell RNA-seq taught us about mammalianspermatogenesis? Biol. Reprod. 101, 617–634 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Li, L. et al. A novel frameshift mutation in ubiquitin-specific protease 26 gene in a patient with severeoligozoospermia. Biosci. Rep. 40, https://doi.org/10.1042/bsr20191902 (2020).

  74. Zhao, Y. et al. Connexin-43 is a promising target for lycopene preventing phthalate-inducedspermatogenic disorders. J. Adv. Res. 49, 115–126 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Mays-Hoopes, L. L., Bolen, J., Riggs, A. D. & Singer-Sam, J. Preparation of spermatogonia,spermatocytes, and round spermatids for analysis of gene expression using fluorescence-activatedcell sorting. Biol. Reprod. 53, 1003–1011 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Sabari, B. R., Zhang, D., Allis, C. D. & Zhao, Y. Metabolic regulation of gene expression through histoneacylations. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 90–101 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ward, W. S. Function of sperm chromatin structural elements in fertilization and development. Mol.Hum. Reprod. 16, 30–36 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Liu, C. et al. Autophagy is required for ectoplasmic specialization assembly in sertoli cells. Autophagy 12, 814–832 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Gewaily, M. S. et al. Comparative expression of cell adhesion molecule1 (CADM1) in the testes ofexperimental mice and some farm animals. Acta Histochem 122, 151456 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Cai, Z. et al. ALKBH5 in mouse testicular Sertoli cells regulates CDH2 mRNA translation to maintainblood-testis barrier integrity. Cell Mol. Biol. Lett. 27, 101 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Mruk, D. D. & Cheng, C. Y. The mammalian blood-testis barrier: its biology and regulation. Endocr. Rev. 36, 564–591 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Simorangkir, D. R. et al. Sertoli cell differentiation in rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) is an earlyevent in puberty and precedes attainment of the adult complement of undifferentiatedspermatogonia. Reproduction 143, 513–522 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Meroni, S. B. et al. Molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways involved in Sertoli cell proliferation. Front Endocrinol 10, 224 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Ou, Y. et al. Primary cilia in the developing pig testis. Cell Tissue Res 358, 597–605 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Li, X. et al. Genomic analyses of wild argali, domestic sheep, and their hybrids provide insights intochromosome evolution, phenotypic variation, and germplasm innovation. Genome Res. 32, 1669–1684 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  86. McGinnis, C. S., Murrow, L. M. & Gartner, Z. J. DoubletFinder: doublet detection in single-cell RNAsequencing data using artificial nearest neighbors. Cell Syst. 8, 329–337 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Camp, J. G. et al. Multilineage communication regulates human liver bud development frompluripotency. Nature 546, 533–538 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Macosko, E. Z. et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161, 1202–1214 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Trapnell, C. et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporalordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 381–386 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Efremova, M., Vento-Tormo, M., Teichmann, S. A. & Vento-Tormo, R. CellPhoneDB: inferring cell-cellcommunication from combined expression of multi-subunit ligand-receptor complexes. Nat. Protoc. 15, 1484–1506 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Jin, S. et al. Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat. Nat. Commun. 12, 1088 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32260833 & No. 32202675), and Discipline Team Project of Gansu Agricultural University (NO. GAU-XKTD-2022-20). We thank the Guangzhou Genedenovo Biotechnology Co., Ltd., for assisting in single-nucleus RNA sequencing. Schematic illustration elements in Figs. 1C, F, 3E, 4D, and 8F were created using Figdraw (www.figdraw.com), an online platform for scientific illustration. The use of these illustration elements complies with the platform’s Terms of Use for academic publishing. License information (Agreement No.) is as follows: Fig. 1C, SSUYUdd744; Fig. 1F, PRRSOc2e8d; Fig. 3E, OIPTOb8ffc; Fig. 4D, YUPUPae06c; Fig. 8F, YSRAO2ad8d.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China

    Hui-hui Wang, Tao-tao Li, Deng-pan Li, Zi-long Liu, Chun-hui Wang & You-ji Ma

  2. Gansu Key Laboratory of Animal Generational Physiology and Reproductive Regulation, Lanzhou, China

    Hui-hui Wang, Tao-tao Li, Deng-pan Li, Zi-long Liu, Chun-hui Wang, Xing-xu Zhao & You-ji Ma

  3. College of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China

    Yong-ju Zhao

  4. Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, College of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Tibet Autonomous Region, Lhasa, China

    Tian-zeng Song

Authors
  1. Hui-hui Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tao-tao Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Deng-pan Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zi-long Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chun-hui Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xing-xu Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yong-ju Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tian-zeng Song
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. You-ji Ma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: H.H.W., Y.J.M. Methodology: H.H.W., D.P.L., Z.L.L., C.H.W. Investigation: X.X.Z., Y.J.Z., T.T.L., T.Z.S. Formal analysis: H.H.W., T.T.L. Visualization: H.H.W. Supervision: T.Z.S., Y.J.M. Writing—original draft: H.H.W. Writing—review & editing: H.H.W., T.T.L., Y.J.M. Funding acquisition: T.T.L., Y.J.M. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to You-ji Ma.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: David Favero.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Supplementary Data 3

Supplementary Data 4

Supplementary Data 5

Supplementary Data 6

Supplementary Data 7

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Hh., Li, Tt., Li, Dp. et al. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing provides insights into the genetic mechanisms underlying reproductive adaptability in Tibetan sheep (Ovis aries). Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09729-1

Download citation

  • Received: 09 October 2025

  • Accepted: 06 February 2026

  • Published: 17 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09729-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Aims & Scope

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Biology (Commun Biol)

ISSN 2399-3642 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing