Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Prospective pan-cancer germline testing using MSK-IMPACT informs clinical translation in 751 patients with pediatric solid tumors

Abstract

The spectrum of germline predisposition in pediatric cancer continues to be realized. Here we report 751 patients with solid tumors who underwent prospective matched tumor–normal DNA sequencing with downstream clinical use (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01775072). Germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants were reported. One or more P/LP variants were found in 18% (138/751) of individuals when including variants in low-, moderate- and high-penetrance dominant or recessive genes or in 13% (99/751) of individuals in moderate- and high-penetrance dominant genes. Thirty-four percent of high- or moderate-penetrance variants were unexpected based on the patient’s diagnosis and previous history. Seventy-six percent of patients with positive results completed a clinical genetics visit, and 21% had at least one relative undergo cascade testing as a result of this testing. Clinical actionability additionally included screening, risk reduction in relatives, reproductive use and targeted therapies. Germline testing should be considered for all children with cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Cancer distribution and germline cancer predisposing mutations detected in MSKCC pediatric patient cohort.
Fig. 2: Clinical translation resulting from detection of cancer predisposing mutations in MSKCC pediatric patient cohort.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Deidentified clinical and molecular data for all patients reported in this study are available in Supplementary Table 1. P/LP variants reported here have been submitted to ClinVar with submission number SUB8689141.

References

  1. Howlader, N. et al. (eds.) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2014 (National Cancer Institute, 2017).

  2. Zhang, J. et al. Germline mutations in predisposition genes in pediatric cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 2336–2346 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mody, R. J. et al. Integrative clinical sequencing in the management of refractory or relapsed cancer in youth. JAMA 314, 913–925 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris, M. H. et al. Multicenter feasibility study of tumor molecular profiling to inform therapeutic decisions in advanced pediatric solid tumors: the individualized cancer therapy (iCat) study. JAMA Oncol. 2, 608–615 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oberg, J. A. et al. Implementation of next generation sequencing into pediatric hematology–oncology practice: moving beyond actionable alterations. Genome Med. 8, 133 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Parsons, D. W. et al. Diagnostic yield of clinical tumor and germline whole-exome sequencing for children with solid tumors. JAMA Oncol. 2, 616–624 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wong, M. et al. Whole genome, transcriptome and methylome profiling enhances actionable target discovery in high-risk pediatric cancer. Nat. Med. 26, 1742–1753 (2020).

  8. Walsh, M. et al. in Abeloff’s Clinical Oncology 6th edn (eds Niederhuber, J. E. et al.) Ch. 13 (Elsevier, 2020).

  9. Holmfeldt, L. et al. The genomic landscape of hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat. Genet. 45, 242–252 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Scollon, S. et al. A comprehensive review of pediatric tumors and associated cancer predisposition syndromes. J. Genet. Couns. 26, 387–434 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Suerink, M. et al. Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency as a differential diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1: consensus guidelines for testing a child without malignancy. J. Med. Genet. 56, 53–62 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gault, M. D. et al. Germline SDHA mutations in children and adults with cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Mol. Case Stud. 4, a002584 (2018).

  13. Oak, N. et al. Ancestry-specific predisposing germline variants in cancer. Genome Med. 12, 51 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Grzymski, J. J. et al. Population genetic screening efficiently identifies carriers of autosomal dominant diseases. Nat. Med. 26, 1235–1239 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Walsh, M.F. et al. Germline BRCA2 mutations detected in pediatric sequencing studies impact parents’ evaluation and care. Cold Spring Harb. Mol. Case Stud. 3, a001925 (2017).

  16. Offit, K. et al. Cascading after peridiagnostic cancer genetic testing: an alternative to population-based screening. J. Clin. Oncol. 38, 1398–1408 (2020).

  17. Le, D. T. et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 2509–2520 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Moore, K. et al. Maintenance olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 2495–2505 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bouffet, E. et al. Immune checkpoint inhibition for hypermutant glioblastoma multiforme resulting from germline biallelic mismatch repair deficiency. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 2206–2211 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gross, A. M. et al. Selumetinib in children with inoperable plexiform neurofibromas. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1430–1442 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fangusaro, J. et al. Selumetinib in paediatric patients with BRAF-aberrant or neurofibromatosis type 1-associated recurrent, refractory, or progressive low-grade glioma: a multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 20, 1011–1022 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. van Vuurden, D. G. et al. PARP inhibition sensitizes childhood high grade glioma, medulloblastoma and ependymoma to radiation. Oncotarget 2, 984–996 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mandelker, D. et al. Mutation detection in patients with advanced cancer by universal sequencing of cancer-related genes in tumor and normal DNA vs guideline-based germline testing. JAMA 318, 825–835 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Walsh, M. F. et al. Integrating somatic variant data and biomarkers for germline variant classification in cancer predisposition genes. Hum. Mutat. 39, 1542–1552 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kratz, C. P. et al. Cancer screening recommendations for individuals with Li–Fraumeni syndrome. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, e38–e45 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rednam, S. P. et al. Von Hippel–Lindau and hereditary pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndromes: clinical features, genetics, and surveillance recommendations in childhood. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, e68–e75 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fiala, E. M. et al. 11p15.5 epimutations in children with Wilms tumor and hepatoblastoma detected in peripheral blood. Cancer 126, 3114–3121 (2020).

  28. Benayed, R. et al. High yield of RNA sequencing for targetable kinase fusions in lung adenocarcinomas with no mitogenic driver alteration detected by DNA sequencing and low tumor mutation burden. Clin. Cancer Res. 25, 4712–4722 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Karam, R. et al. Assessment of diagnostic outcomes of RNA genetic testing for hereditary cancer. JAMA Netw. Open 2, e1913900 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Knapke, S. et al. Hereditary cancer risk assessment in a pediatric oncology follow-up clinic. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 58, 85–89 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mirabello, L. et al. Frequency of pathogenic germline variants in cancer-susceptibility genes in patients with osteosarcoma. JAMA Oncol. 6, 724–734 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Qin, N. et al. Pathogenic germline mutations in DNA repair genes in combination with cancer treatment exposures and risk of subsequent neoplasms among long-term survivors of childhood cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 38, 2728–2740 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sharaf, R. N. et al. Uptake of genetic testing by relatives of Lynch syndrome probands: a systematic review. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11, 1093–1100 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Courtney, E. et al. Impact of free cancer predisposition cascade genetic testing on uptake in Singapore. NPJ Genom. Med. 4, 22 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Frey, M. K. et al. Prospective feasibility trial of a novel strategy of facilitated cascade genetic testing using telephone counseling. J. Clin. Oncol. 38, 1389–1397 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Srinivasan, S. et al. Stakeholder perspectives on overcoming barriers to cascade testing in Lynch syndrome: a qualitative study. Cancer Prev. Res. 13, 1037–1046 (2020).

  37. Tak, C. R. et al. Cost-effectiveness of early cancer surveillance for patients with Li–Fraumeni syndrome. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 66, e27629 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cheng, D. T. et al. Memorial Sloan Kettering-integrated mutation profiling of actionable cancer targets (MSK-IMPACT): a hybridization capture-based next-generation sequencing clinical assay for solid tumor molecular oncology. J. Mol. Diagn. 17, 251–264 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Zehir, A. et al. Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients. Nat. Med. 23, 703–713 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Cheng, D. T. et al. Comprehensive detection of germline variants by MSK-IMPACT, a clinical diagnostic platform for solid tumor molecular oncology and concurrent cancer predisposition testing. BMC Med. Genomics 10, 33 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Richards, S. et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 17, 405–424 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tung, N. et al. Counselling framework for moderate-penetrance cancer-susceptibility mutations. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 13, 581–588 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Shen, R. & Seshan, V. E. FACETS: allele-specific copy number and clonal heterogeneity analysis tool for high-throughput DNA sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e131 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jonsson, P. et al. Tumour lineage shapes BRCA-mediated phenotypes. Nature 571, 576–579 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Niu, B. et al. MSIsensor: microsatellite instability detection using paired tumor–normal sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 1015–1016 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded in part by the Robert and Kate Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, the Pediatric Translational Medicine Program, the Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology and the National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Core grant number P30-CA008748.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.F.W., E.M.F. and A.Z. conceptualized and designed the study. E.M.F., G.J., A. Mauguen, J.A.K., N.B., Y.K., M.H.F., A. Maio, E.E.S.-M., M. Sheehan, A.G.A., A.L., M.I.C., K.C., S. Murkherjee, E.K.S., T.T., J.G.B., P.A.M., L.W., F.S.D.C., N.-K.C., E.B., A.K., M.O., J.H.F., I.J.D., Y.K., S.G., S.F.S., C.J.F., M. Sulis, M.K., S. Modak, T.E.H., S.R., C.Y., S.J., J.V., S.T., D.N.F., Z.K.S., M.R., M.F.B., N.S., M.L., R.J.O.R., D.H.A., O.C.-B., L.Z., D.M., N.N.S., A.L.K., K.O., A.Z. and M.F.W. acquired, analyzed and interpreted the data. M.F.W. and E.M.F. drafted the manuscript. G.J., A. Mauguen, J.A.K., N.B., Y.K., M.H.F., A. Maio, E.E.S.-M., M. Sheehan, A.G.A., A.L., M.I.C., K.C., S. Murkherjee, E.K.S., T.T., J.G.B., P.A.M., L.W., F.S.D.C., N.-K.C., E.B., A.K., M.O., J.H.F., I.J.D., Y.K., S.G., S.F.S., C.J.F., M. Sulis, M.K., S. Modak, J.T.G., T.E.H., S.R., C.Y., S.J., J.V., S.T., D.N.F., Z.K.S., M.R., M.F.B., N.S., M.L., R.J.O.R., D.H.A., O.C.-B., L.Z., D.M., N.N.S., A.L.K., K.O. and A.Z. critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. A. Mauguen performed the statistical analysis. M.F.W., A.L.K., K.O. and M.L. obtained funding. E.M.F., J.A.K., N.B., Y.K., M.H.F., A. Maio, E.E.S.-M., M. Sheehan and A.G.A. performed administrative, technical or material support. M.F.W., A.Z., A.L.K. and K.O. supervised the study.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ahmet Zehir or Michael F. Walsh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

P.A.M.: Takeda, uncompensated speaking; Amgen, stock ownership; Ipsen, mock ODAC panel; Salarius, mock ODAC panel; P.A.M.’s spouse: Boehringer Ingelheim, consulting; Genentech, speakers’ bureau; Eastern Pulmonary Society. N.K.C. holds ownership interest/equity in Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Inc., reports receiving commercial research grants from Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Inc., and Abpro Labs, Inc., holding ownership interest/equity in Abpro Labs and owning stock options in Eureka Therapeutics, Inc. N.K.C. is a scientific advisory board member of Abpro Labs and Eureka Therapeutics. N.K.C. is the inventor and owner of issued patents licensed by MSK to Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Biotec Pharmacon and Abpro Labs. I.J.D. has done consulting and advisory board activities with Apexigen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Fennec and Roche. I.J.D. has served as an institutional PI for pharma-sponsored clinical trials at MSKCC from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech and Novartis. M.K. has consultant agreements with AstraZeneca, Bayer, CereXis, QED Therapeutics and Recursion Pharma (personal fees received). S. Modak. is a consultant to Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Inc., Illumina, Inc., and Progenics Pharmaceuticals. Z.K.S.’s immediate family member serves as a consultant for Allergan, Adverum Biotechnologies, Alimera Sciences, Fortress Biotech, Genentech/Roche, Novartis, Optos, Regeneron, Regenxbio and Spark Therapeutics.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Cancer thanks Todd Druley, Heather Hampel and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fiala, E.M., Jayakumaran, G., Mauguen, A. et al. Prospective pan-cancer germline testing using MSK-IMPACT informs clinical translation in 751 patients with pediatric solid tumors. Nat Cancer 2, 357–365 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-021-00172-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-021-00172-1

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer