Abstract
Constraining the timing of accretion, differentiation, and breakup of early-formed protoplanets helps to unravel the Solar System’s evolution. The recent discovery of the oldest crustal material, Erg Chech 002, has provided important constraints on the timing of accretion and magmatism in the inner Solar System. Based on the age discrepancies of iron meteorites and basalts from the inner and outer Solar System reservoirs, it is accepted that protoplanets in the inner Solar System formed first. However, here we report on Northwest Africa 12264, a dunite originating from the outer Solar System, which records in-situ Pb–Pb and 26Al–26Mg ages of 4569.8 ± 4.6 and 4564.44 ± 0.30 Ma, respectively. This demonstrates that protoplanets beyond the snowline accreted, differentiated, and broke apart rapidly and concurrently with those in the inner Solar System. Our findings are consistent with observations of exoprotoplanetary disks that imply rapid planetesimal formation coincided across radial distances.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
A key event early in Solar System history was the accretion of protoplanets and their subsequent differentiation. This led to the formation of layered bodies composed of a metallic core, overlain by a silicate mantle and capped by a basaltic crust. Understanding the timing of protoplanet accretion and differentiation are fundamental ‘known unknowns’ in our Solar System’s history1. Additional accurate data on the early Solar System chronology from a wider array of objects, sampling different reservoirs, is crucial for refining models and determining the processes (i.e. oligarchic growth or pebble accretion2,3) of rocky planet formation and how the larger planets, including Earth, were formed.
The measurement of nucleosynthetic stable isotope ratios from terrestrial rocks, meteorites and sample return missions reveals a clear divide between the carbonaceous and non-carbonaceous groups. This dichotomy has been interpreted as representing the outer and inner Solar System reservoirs, respectively4,5. Calcium-aluminium-rich inclusions (CAIs) are refractory components found in undifferentiated meteorites formed by direct condensation from the solar nebula6, resulting in their radiometric dates acting as the time zero age for our Solar System. High-precision Pb-Pb dating of CAIs gives a canonical Solar System ‘zero age’ of 4567.3 ± 0.16 Ma7, while recent statistical estimations have revised this age to 4568.36 ± 0.20 Ma8.
182Hf–182W chronology of iron meteorites indicates that protoplanets in the non-carbonaceous (NC) reservoir, interpreted as originating in the inner Solar System, differentiated ∼1–2 Ma after CAIs, while those in the outer Solar System, the carbonaceous chondrite (CC) region, experienced core formation ∼1 Ma later9. Evidence suggests this variance is due to a higher water fraction in the CC iron meteorite parent bodies. This led to a delayed melting and metal segregation onset due to the dilution of 26Al, combined with increases in thermal inertia and effective heat dissipation by porous water convection9. Therefore, the production of fully differentiated bodies in the outer Solar System, with a thin pyroxene–olivine–rich basaltic crust, a thick olivine–rich mantle and an iron–rich core, is expected to have occurred later than in the inner Solar System10. However, evidence of these ancient crusts and mantle materials is scarce, likely due to the higher rate of planetary collisions of the early Solar System and the subsequent incorporation of these ancient protoplanets into the terrestrial planets and the challenges in identifying them as meteorites on Earth.
Evidence of a primordial crust from one of these ancient inner Solar System protoplanets has been recently discovered11,12,13,14. Based on thermal models, Erg Chech 002 (EC 002) formed as a result of partial melting and rapid crystallisation on the surface of a small protoplanet (20–30 km in diameter15), while 26Al-26Mg chronometry indicates the sample formed ∼2 Ma after the formation of the CAIs7,8,11,16. In contrast, to date, the oldest basalts from the CC region, NWA 6704 and NWA 2976, show younger 26Al–26Mg ages of 4563.07 ± 0.24 and 4563.30 ± 0.21 Ma, respectively, ~5 Ma after the formation of the CAIs17,18. This chronological evidence, albeit limited, among the ungrouped basaltic achondrites, supports the idea of earlier protoplanet formation in the NC region.
Here, we report new age data from a recently recovered brecciated olivine–rich ungrouped achondrite (dunite). This sample, Northwest Africa (NWA) 12264, formed on a first–generation differentiated protoplanet in the outer Solar System19. We demonstrate that it is the oldest magmatic rock from the outer Solar System analyzed thus far and provides crucial empirical constraints on the timing of differentiation in the most ancient protoplanets that formed beyond the snowline. It demonstrates simultaneous accretion and differentiation processes operating in the inner and outer Solar System, challenging the long-held paradigm of delayed planet formation beyond Jupiter.
Results
Petrography and microstructures
NWA 12264 is a cataclastic breccia composed of approximately ∼95 vol% olivine (up to 2 cm in diameter) within a sparse olivine–rich matrix, with highly variable chemistry (Fo45.1–89.3)20. While the sample exhibits highly variable Fo contents, the dominant olivine (~85 wt%) has a Fo content of 77.7 ± 0.3, which is similar to other meteoritic dunites from the Moon, 4 Vesta and the angrite parent body21,22,23. In terrestrial terms (based on the olivine content >90%), it would be classified as a dunite—a rock generally found in the Earth’s mantle. While some olivine grains display extensive crystal plastic deformation (>15°), others show evidence of fresh growth and recrystallisation (Fig. 1). The sample also contains minor chromite–pyroxene symplectites, pigeonite (Wo5±2.5) with augite exsolution lamellae (Wo41.2±2.8) and diopside (Wo43.7±0.5). Plagioclase (An86.4±7.8) is crystalline, with no maskelynite present, indicating shock pressures <15 GPa24. Silica polymorphs diffract as tridymite, indicating high temperatures of >870 °C25 (Fig. S1). Phosphates occur as euhedral grains (~50 µm), often associated with other interstitial minerals (pyroxene and chromite). The phosphates show little to no crystal plastic deformation (<5°) and no evidence of recrystallisation (Fig. 2).
Pb-Pb systematics
A total of 10 in-situ Pb–Pb isotopic analyses were carried out on phosphates within NWA 12264 (Fig. 3). Based on regression through Canyon Diablo Troilite (CDT) Pb isotope composition (which assumes that phosphates incorporated primordial Pb akin to that in the protosolar nebula26), NWA 12264 phosphates yield a Pb–Pb isochron date of 4569.8 ± 4.6 Ma, with a mean squared weighted deviation (MSWD) of 0.62. Regression through Stacey & Kramers (S & K) modern terrestrial Pb isotope composition27 (which assumes that common Pb in the analyzed phosphates is terrestrial contamination) yields an identical date of 4569.8 ± 4.6 Ma, with an MSWD of 0.61. Modelled 207Pb/206Pb ages produce a weighted mean of 4571 ± 4.6 Ma. All errors are 2σ. All data are available in Supplementary Data 1.
Al–Mg systematics
A total of 38 analyses were carried out, with 24 on feldspar, 10 on pyroxene and 4 on olivine grains. All three minerals define a single coherent 26Al isochron with an initial 26Al/27Al ratio of (1.18 ± 0.25) × 10−6, MSWD = 1.52 (Fig. 4). This ratio translates into a closure age of the 26Al–26Mg system of 4564.44 ± 0.30 Ma (i.e. 3.86 ± 0.22 Ma after CAIs assuming 4568.36 ± 0.2 Ma as the formation age of CAIs8). The calculated initial δ26Mg* (δ26Mg*0 = + 0.18 ± 1) is consistent with the average composition of the pyroxenes and olivines. All errors are 2σ. All data are available in Supplementary Data 1.
O-isotope compositions
A total of 19 analyses were performed on olivine grains with differing Fo contents (Fo45-8920). All measured olivine grains demonstrated consistent values with an average oxygen isotopic composition of δ17O = –3.42 ± 0.55 ‰, δ18O = 0.65 ± 0.49 and Δ17O = –3.76 ± 0.40‰ (Fig. 5). All errors are 2σ. All data are available in Supplementary Data 1.
Discussion
NWA 12264 exhibits chromium-oxygen (Cr/O) isotopic signatures that unequivocally place it within the carbonaceous reservoir, strongly implying its formation occurred in the outer Solar System19. This means that dates from NWA 12,264 provide essential new information on the timing of planetary evolution beyond the orbit of Jupiter.
The dates obtained in this study are ancient, with the Pb–Pb age derived from phosphates overlapping with CAI formation, while the 26Al–26Mg age is ~4 Ma post-CAI formation. The discrepancy between our two independent age estimates is not entirely unexpected. Past work dating individual chondrules within chondritic meteorites or different minerals within volcanic achondrites produced similar discordances with older Pb-Pb ages28,29. It has been previously argued that a heterogeneous distribution of 26Al in the early Solar System could result in discrepancies in previously measured achondrites30, which may be the reason for the discrepancy in NWA 12264. Alternatively, studies have demonstrated that complex geological histories of extraterrestrial samples, including overprinting of thermal and shock metamorphism, are likely to have affected the time of closure of the two chronometers, undermining their synchronicity31. This is particularly important when evaluating the 26Al–26Mg systematics of plagioclase, which can be easily reset due to the fast self-diffusion of Mg in its crystal lattice32. In the case of NWA 12264, the sample has experienced shock metamorphism and intense brecciation, as evidenced by the reasonably high degrees of misorientation and recrystallisation of olivine. This could imply that our derived 26Al–26Mg age for NWA 12264 is disturbed, implying shock resetting and, potentially, the date for the breakup of the parent protoplanet. Conversely, the lower boundary of the uncertainties of the Pb–Pb age may represent the initial magmatic crystallisation of the sample, thus dating the timing of differentiation. This idea is supported by the lack of recrystallisation and very low degrees of deformation in the phosphates themselves (Fig. 2). However, the closure temperature of Pb in phosphate33 is lower than that of Mg in plagioclase32 and thus, if the shock has reset the Mg in plagioclase, one would assume it would also reset the Pb-Pb age of the phosphate. Although we do note that both Pb and Mg may have behaved differently in the early Solar System compared to idealised experimental lab setups. It is therefore difficult to confidently determine the cause of the age discrepancy between the Pb-Pb age and 26Al–26Mg age for NWA 12,264, however, in either scenario, both the Pb–Pb and the 26Al–26Mg are older than (and outside the uncertainty of) all previously measured outer Solar System basalts, i.e. NWA 6704 and NWA 2976 (4563.07 ± 0.24 and 4563.30 ± 0.21 Ma, respectively17,18]), indicating that the parent body of NWA 12264 accreted, differentiated and broke apart within a rapid timeframe (Fig. 6).
Chronological events (CAIs8; SBT differentiation9) are defined against achondrites. U-corrected Pb-Pb ages are provided for angrites, due to the potential 26Al heterogeneity in the early Solar System. The error bars correspond to 2σ. Source Data are provided as a Source Data File.
Crucially, the ages recorded by NWA 12264 are older than expected, outside the uncertainty of Al-Mg derived ages of the angrites (4563.31 ± 0.21 Ma34), some of the most ancient basalts from the inner Solar System. Although, due to the potential for 26Al heterogeneity in the early Solar System, we also provide a comparison to U-corrected Pb-Pb ages of the angrites35. The ages of NWA 12264 still fall outside of this range, but not by as much as compared to the Al-Mg derived ages. These findings push back the earliest known outer Solar System differentiation age by ~2 million years. These findings support new models36 and challenge the current paradigm, which posits that protoplanets in the outer Solar System accreted more slowly and underwent differentiation later than their inner Solar System counterparts9.
Data from the Atacama Large Millimetre Array (ALMA), particularly from the Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP), demonstrate that many protoplanetary disks have complex structures, with multiple well-defined and narrow dust rings observed at substantial distances from the host star37,38. The presence of narrow, tightly confined rings challenges the smooth disk assumption (a monotonic decrease in dust density as a function of increased heliocentric distance out from the host star) that has historically dominated models of protoplanetary disk evolution39. While some rings have been interpreted as resulting from planet-disk interactions, especially in cases where features like probable mean-motion resonances, ‘double gaps’ or anomalous thermal signatures are identified37,40,41, their origin remains uncertain, with alternative explanations possible42. Thus, pressure bumps and dust gaps likely correspond to planet-forming regions in at least some or most sites and these features are now well documented to be forming across a wide range of heliocentric distances, including beyond the water-ice snowline. These data support the view that planetesimal formation at large heliocentric distances may have been common in the early Solar System and could help explain the apparent synchronicity in the accretion and differentiation of inner and outer Solar System bodies, as suggested by comparison with data from Erg Chech 002.
The oxygen isotope systematics of NWA 12264 (δ18O = 0.65 ± 0.49, Δ17O = –3.76 ± 0.40 ‰; 2σ) overlap with other achondritic meteorites, namely: the ungrouped pallasite Milton (δ18O = –3.1 ± 1.4, Δ17O = –3.6 ± 1.1 ‰ 2σ43) and the South Byron Trio (SBT) a grouplet of iron meteorites (δ18O = –8.4 ± 0.9, Δ17O = –3.7 ± 0.1 ‰ 2σ44) (Fig. 5). Previously, a close link between Milton and the SBT was inferred based not only on their similar O-isotope compositions but also on shared metallographic features, including similar siderophile isotopic (Mo and Ru) compositions, similar depletions of volatile elements and redox-sensitive elements (W, Mo, Fe and P relative to CI chondrite values) as well as characteristic Ni-rich metal compositions and similar cooling rates43. Thus, similarities across a large diversity of independent metrics strongly imply that both meteorites either originated from the same parent body (as chemically distinct melts) or from separate bodies as cosmochemical neighbours. Based on the O-isotope composition of NWA 12264, we suggest that this sample could represent the first silicate-dominated representative of this group and, therefore, expand the range of sampled materials from the core (SBT) and potentially the core-mantle boundary (Milton pallasite) to the mantle (NWA 12264). Further support for the above single-parent body origin can be found in the Pb–Pb age of NWA 12264 (Fig. 3), which overlaps with the metal-silicate differentiation age of the SBT meteorites (2.1 ± 0.8 Ma after CAIs44).
Rapid accretion was the primary factor controlling the size required for differentiation. During efficient accretion scenarios, modelling suggests that bodies larger than 20 km could have retained enough heat from the decay of short-lived radioisotopes to exceed the chondritic solidus45. Nevertheless, the NWA 12264 parent body likely accreted low amounts of water-ice to allow for such an early differentiation time as discussed for the SBT iron meteorites9.
NWA 12264 stands as a single representative of a former outer Solar System planetesimal’s mantle. However, some potentially unrecognised, exciting additional samples exist. NWA 7822, for example, is reported to contain a similar proportion of olivine (>90 vol%) and interstitial pyroxene and plagioclase to that of NWA 12264. However, NWA 7822 displays major differences in chemistry, chromium isotopic compositions and distinct oxygen isotopic compositions (Δ17O = –4.066 ± 0.119‰ 2σ46). This implies that NWA 7822 formed on a distinct parent body from NWA 12264 that also experienced core–mantle differentiation, indicating that at least two distinct bodies in the outer Solar System experienced extensive differentiation, supporting the existing evidence found in iron meteorites from the CC reservoir9. This study indicates that protoplanet-scale differentiation processes in the outer carbonaceous region may be more prevalent than previous evidence suggested.
Materials and methods
Petrography and microstructure
Following established methods47, for petrographic examination, a polished resin block of NWA 12264 was coated with carbon using a Safematic CCU-010 Compact Coating Unit (<5 nm). The block was then investigated using a Zeiss Crossbeam 550 with an Oxford Instruments Symmetry 2 EBSD detector at The Open University. High-resolution energy dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping was collected using an Oxford Instruments Ultim Extreme (P, Cl) and an Oxford Instruments Ultim Max detector (all other major elements). The sample was tilted to 70° and an electron beam was used to generate EBSD ‘maps’, consisting of electron backscatter diffraction patterns (EBSPs) acquired at step sizes of 400 nm. The beam conditions used for both EDS and EBSD analyses comprised an incident beam ranging between 1 and 2 nA current and a 20 kV accelerating voltage at a working distance of 12 mm.
Secondary ion mass spectrometry
Phosphates were measured in-situ following established methods23 using a CAMECA IMS1280 large-geometry ion microprobe at the NordSIMS facility, Swedish Museum of Natural History. An Oregon Physics H201 RF Plasma source generated an O2− Gaussian beam of ~2 nA with an impact energy of 23 kV, which was rastered over 5 × 5 μm areas. Before analysis, a ~15 × 15 μm rastered area was pre-sputtered for ~80 s to remove the gold coat and to minimise surface contamination. During analysis, the field aperture limited the field of view on the sample to a 7 μm square, further discriminating against surface and/or grain boundary-hosted contamination. All four Pb isotopes (204Pb, 206Pb, 207Pb and 208Pb) were measured simultaneously using low-noise (<0.003 cps) multichannel ion counting detection at a nominal mass resolution of 4860 (M/ΔM). In the Pb–Pb routine, the magnetic field was locked using an NMR field sensor in regulation mode, and 18 cycles of 20-s integrations were performed. Inter-detector yields in both routines were determined using repeated analyses of the USGS BCR-2G reference glass48. Age calculations were performed using Isoplot-Ex v. 4.1549 and assume the decay constant and 238U/235U ratio (137.794 ± 0.225) recommendations50; in inverse Pb/Pb space, error correlations are negligible and have been ignored. The source of nonradiogenic Pb in these early Solar System samples is difficult to constrain accurately, so regression calculations are presented with two ages. The first assumes the nonradiogenic Pb is terrestrial contamination introduced during both post-fall residence on Earth as well as laboratory processing and represented by model modern terrestrial Pb27; the second assumes an initial Pb component represented by initial solar system Pb CDT26, which is unlikely to have evolved to significantly more radiogenic compositions at the ages determined herein. Arbitrary 1σ uncertainties of 2% and 1%, respectively, have been assigned to these reference values in the calculations.
Nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry
The Cameca NanoSIMS 50L at the Open University (Milton Keynes, UK) was used to measure the Mg isotopes of plagioclase, pyroxene and olivine and the O isotopes of olivine in the studied resin block of NWA 12264, following established methods51.
Mg isotopic analyses were carried out using an O− ion beam from the Duo Plasmatron source. Before analysis, a probe current of 16 kV and 500 pA was used to pre-sputter each area (8 × 8 μm) for 3 min to remove the carbon coat and surface contamination and to achieve sputter equilibrium. The sizes of areas were reduced to 4 × 4 μm for analyses.
For plagioclase (27Al/24Mg > 300), a probe current of 500 pA was used for analyses with an analysis time of 20 min. Secondary ions of 24Mg+, 25Mg+, 26Mg+ and 44Ca+ were collected using electron multipliers, and 27Al+ was measured using a Faraday cup to accommodate for the high 27Al+ counts. For pyroxene and olivine (27Al/24Mg < 0.05), a 5 pA probe current was used for analyses with an analysis time of 4 min. All five secondary ion species of 24Mg+, 25Mg+, 26Mg+, 27Al+ and 40Ca+ were collected simultaneously using electron multipliers. The mass resolving power was set to over 12,000 (Cameca definition52) for all Mg isotopic analyses. 27Al/24Mg ratios were corrected using sensitivity factors defined for each measurement session using the Al/Mg measured by EPMA on the standards.
Miyake Jima anorthite (Al/Mg = 396.3) was used as the standard for plagioclase, while San Carlos olivine and Shallow Water enstatite were used as the standards for olivine and pyroxene, respectively. The Mg isotopic composition of the standards is assumed to be identical to the terrestrial value52. The typical total counts for plagioclase were 1.7 × 107 for 24Mg, 2.2 × 106 for 25Mg, 2.4 × 106 for 26Mg, 7.7 × 109 for 27Al and 1.6 × 108 for 44Ca. For olivine, the total counts were 1.7 × 107 for 24Mg, 2.2 × 106 for 25Mg, 2.4 × 106 for 26Mg, 1.3 × 104 for 27Al and 7.9 × 104 for 40Ca and for pyroxene the total counts were 1.3 × 107 for 24Mg, 1.7 × 106 for 25Mg, 1.8 × 106 for 26Mg, 3.9 × 105 for 27Al and 3.0 × 105 for 40Ca.
A Cs+ ion beam was used to measure the O isotopes of olivine. Before analysis, each area was pre-sputtered with a 16 kV and 100 pA Cs+ probe for 4 min over an area of 7 × 7 mm to remove the carbon coat and surface contamination and to achieve sputter equilibrium. Analyses were performed with a 100 pA Cs+ probe rastered over 5 × 5 mm in ‘spot’ mode, with each scan of the area lasting 0.54 s. An electron flood gun was used for charge compensation. Six different secondary ion species were collected simultaneously, with 16O− measured on a Faraday cup while 17O−, 18O−, 30Si−, 26Mg16O− and 56Fe16O− were measured on electron multipliers. A mass resolving power of ~11,000 (Cameca definition52) was used, which is sufficient to resolve the 16OH− interference from 17O−. The 16OH− signal was measured for 10 s at the start and end of each measurement. Each analysis lasted approximately 9 min, providing a total of ~1.5 × 1010 counts for 16O−. Analyses were corrected for instrumental mass fractionation against a standard sample of San Carlos olivine (Fo90), analyzed before and after each block of unknown samples. Analytical uncertainty (all 2σ), incorporating internal precision and external precision from standard replicates, is typically ± 1.2‰ for δ17O, ± 0.7‰ for δ18O, and ~±1.2‰ for Δ17O. San Carlos olivine (Fo90), olivine from the Eagle Station pallasite (Fo80), and an olivine with a composition of Fo72 were used for matrix correction, and offsets of 0.6–2.9 per-mil between the sample and San Carlos olivine were applied to account for differences in the Fe/Mg of the samples of olivine to the standard.
All positions of raster pits for both Mg and O isotopes were checked and verified using the SEM following analyses (Figs. S2–S5). Spots that sampled a mix of phases, as well as spots affected by holes/cracks, were rejected.
Establishing age from Al-Mg systematics
Isotopic ratios measured by NanoSIMS are reported relative to the DSM-3 standard in delta notation as Eqs. 1 and 2, with \({\left(\frac{{25\atop}\text{Mg}}{{24\atop}\text{Mg}}\right)}_{\text{DSM}-3}=0.12663\pm 0.0013\) and \({\left(\frac{{26\atop}\text{Mg}}{{24\atop}\text{Mg}}\right)}_{\text{DSM}-3}=0.13932\pm 0.0026\)53.
The radiogenic excess of \({26\atop}\text{Mg}\) due to the decay of \({26\atop}\text{Al}\) (\({\delta }^{26}\text{M}{\text{g}}^{* }\)) is calculated using a mass fractionation factor of \(\beta =0.5128\) 54 as
using the mass fractionation law used in ref. 55. The choices of mass fractionation law across the literature are variable. However, we find that the choice of fractionation law and fractionation coefficient used in this work only results in minor changes to the derived parameters below the uncertainties, and the shifts are mainly in the \({\left({\delta }^{26}\text{M}{\text{g}}_{\text{corr}}^{* }\right)}_{0}\) value derived from the fit. Therefore, the relative age derived in this work for NWA 12264 is not particularly sensitive to this choice. This is calculated for both the sample and the standards measured in the same session. The radiogenic excess is then corrected for instrumental bias using the bracketing standards measured in the same session as NWA 12264 as
The \({\delta }^{26}\text{M}{\text{g}}_{\text{corr}}^{* }\) values are then plotted against instrumental bias-corrected \({27\atop}\text{Al}/{24\atop}\text{Mg}\) ratios. A linear trend is fit to the data using orthogonal distance regression implemented in the scipy Python package56 to enable fitting accounting for uncertainties in both x and y values. Using the following relationship:
(caption of Fig. 1 in ref. 57), the intercept of the line corresponds to the initial radiogenic excess \({\left({\delta }^{26}\text{M}{\text{g}}_{\text{corr}}^{* }\right)}_{0}\) and the slope of the line, \(m\), can be used to obtain the initial aluminium isotopic ratio \({\left(\frac{{26\atop}\text{Al}}{{27\atop}\text{Al}}\right)}_{0} = \frac{m}{1000}\times {\left(\frac{{26\atop}\text{Mg}}{{24\atop}\text{Mg}}\right)}_{\text{DSM}-3}\). Using the CAIs as an anchor, we can derive the relative age of the sample from its \({\left(\frac{{26\atop}\text{Al}}{{27\atop}\text{Al}}\right)}_{0}\) value55,
where \({\left(\frac{{26\atop}\text{Al}}{{27\atop}\text{Al}}\right)}_{0,\text{CAIs}}=\left(5.23\pm 0.13\right)\times {10}^{-5}\) 28, \({t}_{1/2}=0.717\,\text{Ma}\)58. We then calculate the absolute age of the sample as \({t}_{\text{sample}}(\text{Ma})={t}_{\text{CAIs}}-\Delta t\) using a CAI age of \({t}_{\text{CAIs}}=\,4568.36\pm 0.2\,\text{Ma}\)8. All ages compared to NWA 12264 were recomputed from the \({\left(\frac{{26\atop}\text{Al}}{{27\atop}\text{Al}}\right)}_{0}\) values presented in the literature using the same parameters as stated above for NWA 12264, to enable consistent comparisons across the various samples.
Data availability
All study data are included in the article and/or Supplementary Files. Source Data for figures are provided with the paper.
References
Jacquet, E., Dullemond, C., Drazkowska, J. & Desch, S. The early Solar System and its meteoritical witnesses. Space Sci. Rev. 220, 78 (2024).
Morbidelli, A., Kleine, T. & Nimmo, F. Did the terrestrial of the solar system form by pebble accretion? Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 650, 119120 (2025).
Marrocchi, Y., Hammouda, T., Boyet, M., Avice, G. & Morbidelli, A. Porphyritic olivine chondrules with enstatite chondrite isotopic compositions as a main building block of Earth. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 659, 119337 (2025).
Warren, P. H. Stable-isotopic anomalies and the accretionary assemblage of the Earth and Mars: a subordinate role for carbonaceous chondrites. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 311, 93–100 (2011).
Bermingham, K. R., Furi, E., Lodders, K. & Marty, B. The NC-CC isotope dichotomy: Implications for the chemical and isotopic evolution of the early Solar System. Space Sci. Rev. 216, 1–29 (2020).
Grossman, L. Condensation in the primitive solar nebula. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 36, 597–619 (1972).
Connelly, J. N. et al. Evidence for very early planetesimal formation and 26Al/27Al heterogeneity in the protoplanetary disk. Astrophys. J. Lett. 952, 33 (2023).
Desch, S. J., Dunlap, D. R., Williams, C. D., Mane, P. & Dunham, E. T. Statistical chronometry of meteorites: II. Initial abundances and homogeneity of short-lived radionuclides. Icarus 402, 115611 (2023).
Spitzer, F., Burkhardt, C., Nimmo, F. & Kleine, T. Nucleosynthetic Pt isotope anomalies and the Hf-W chronology of core formation in inner and outer Solar System protoplanets. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 576, 117211 (2021).
Lichtenberg, T., Drazkowska, J., Schonbachler, M., Golabekm, G. J. & Hands, T. O. Bifurcation of planetary building blocks during Solar System formation. Science 371, 365–370 (2021).
Barrat, J-A. et al. A 4,565-my-old andesite from an extinct chondritic protoplanet. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026129118 (2021).
Anand, A., Kruttasch, P. M. & Mezger, K. 53Mn-53Cr chronology and ε54Cr-Δ17O genealogy of Erg Chech 002: the oldest andesite in the Solar System. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 57, 2003–2016 (2022).
Reger, P. M. et al. Al-Mg and U-Pb chronological records of Erg Chech 002 ungrouped achondrite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 343, 33–48 (2023).
Jin, Z., Zhang, Y., Bose, M., Glynn, S., & Couffignal, F. Petrogenesis of Erg Chech 002 achondrite and implications for an altered Magma Ocean. Astrophys. J. 965, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad2ea7 (2024).
Neumann, W., Luter, R., Trieloff, M., Reger, P. M., & Bouvier, A. Thermal history of the Erg Chech 002 parent body: early accretion and early differentiation of a small asteroid. Earth Planet. Astrophys. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.12753 (2023).
Fang, L. et al. Half-life and initial solar system abundance of 146Sm determined from the oldest andesitic meteorite. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2120933119 (2022).
Sanborn, M. E. et al. Carbonaceous achondrites Northwest Africa 6704/6693: Milestones for early Solar System chronology and genealogy. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 245, 577–596 (2019).
Bouvier, A., Spivak-Birndorf, L. J., Brennecka, G. A. & Wadhwa, M. New constraints on early Solar System chronology from Al-Mg and U-Pb isotope systematics in the unique basaltic achondrite Northwest Africa 2976. Geochim. et. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 5310–5323 (2011).
Ali, A. & Jabeen, I. Evaluating the O-Cr-Mn isotope signatures in various meteorites representing core-mantle-crust fragments: implications for partially differentiated protoplanets in the early outer Solar System. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 56, 393–403 (2021).
Rider-Stokes, B. G. et al. The missing mantle problem: from a spectral perspective. Icarus 116506, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2025.116506 (2025).
Treiman, A. H. & Semprich, J. A dunite fragment in meteorite Northwest Africa (NWA) 11421: a piece of the Moon’s mantle. Am. Mineral. 103, 2182–2192 (2023).
Beck, A. W. et al. MIL 03443, a dunite from asteroid 4 Vesta: evidence for its classification and cumulate origin. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 46, 1133–1151 (2011).
Rider-Stokes, B. G. et al. The impact history and prolonged magmatism of the angrite parent body. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 59, 23–39 (2024).
Hu, J., Asimow, P. D., Liu, Y. & Ma, C. Shocked-recovered maskelynite indicates low-pressure ejection of shergottites from Mars. Sci. Adv. 9, 18 (2023).
Morris, R. V. et al. Silicic volcanism on Mars evidenced by tridymite in high-SiO2 sedimentary rock at Gale crater. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7071–7076 (2016).
Tatsumoto, M., Knight, R. J. & Allegre, C. J. Time differences in the formation of meteorites as determined from the ratio of lead-207 to lead-206. Science 180, 1279–1283 (1973).
Stacey, J. S. & Kramers, J. D. Approximation of terrestrial lead isotope evolution by a two stage model. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 26, 207–221 (1975).
Jacobsen, B. et al. 26Al–26Mg and 207Pb–206Pb systematics of Allende CAIs: Canonical solar initial 26Al/27Al ratio reinstated. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 272, 353–364 (2008).
Deligny, C., Piralla, M., Villeneuve, J., Furi, E., & Marrocchi, Y. Potential chronological disturbance of the D’Orbigny angrite inferred from discordant 26Al ages. Astrophys. J. Lett. 975. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad8654 (2024).
Wimpenny, J. et al. Reassessing the origin and chronology of the unique achondrite Asuka 881394: implications for distribution of 26Al in the early Solar System. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 244, 478–501 (2019).
Piralla, M., Villeneuve, J., Schnuriger, N., Bekaert, D. & Marrocchi, Y. A unified chronology of dust formation in the early solar system. Icarus 394, 115427 (2023).
Var Orman, J. A., Cherniak, D. J. & Kita, N. T. Magnesium diffusion in plagioclase: Dependence on composition, and implications for thermal resetting of the 26Al-26Mg early solar system chronometer. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 385, 79–88 (2014).
Harrison, T. M., Catlos, E. J. & Montel, J.-M. U-Th-Pb dating of phosphate minerals. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 48, 524–558 (2002).
Schiller, M., Connelly, J. N., Glad, A. C., Mikouchi, T. & Bizzarro, M. Early accretion of protoplanets inferred from a reduced inner solar system 26Al inventory. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 420, 45–54 (2015).
Tissot, F., Dauphas, N. & Grove, T. Distinct 238U/235U ratios and REE patterns in plutonic and volcanic angrites: geochronologic implications and evidence for U isotope fractionation during magmatic processes. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 213, 593–617 (2017).
Morbidelli, A. et al. Contemporary formation of early Solar System planetesimals at two distinct radial locations. Nat. Astron. 6, 72–79 (2022).
Dullemond, C. P. et al. The disk substructures at high angular resolution project (DSHARP). VI. Dust trapping in thin-ringed protoplanetary disks. Astrophys. J. Lett. 869, L46 (2018).
Huang, J. et al. The disk substructures at high angular resolution project (DSHARP). II. Characteristics of annular substructures. Astrophys. J. Lett. 869, L42 (2018).
Tazzari, M. et al. Multiwavelength analysis for interferometric (sub-) mm observations of protoplanetary disks-Radial constraints on the dust properties and the disk structure. Astron. Astrophys. 588, A53 (2016).
Pinte, C. et al. Nine localized deviations from Keplerian rotation in the DSHARP circumstellar disks: kinematic evidence for protoplanets carving the gaps. Astrophys. J. Lett. 890, L9 (2020).
Pinte, C. et al. Kinematic and thermal signatures of the directly imaged protoplanet candidate around Elias 2− 24. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett. 526, L41–L46 (2023).
Morbidelli, A. et al. Formation and evolution of a protoplanetary disk: combining observations, simulations, and cosmochemical constraints. Astron. Astrophys. 691, A147 (2024).
McCoy, T. J. et al. The Milton pallasite and south Bryson trio irons: evidence for oxidation and core crystallization. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 259, 358–370 (2019).
Hilton, C. D., Bermingham, K. R., Walker, R. J. & McCoy, T. J. Genetics, crystallization sequence, and age of the South Byron Trio iron meteorites: new insights to carbonaceous chondrite (CC) type parent bodies. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 251, 217–228 (2019).
Neumann, W., Ma, N., Bouvier, A. & Trieloff, M. Recurrent protoplanet formation in an outer part of the early solar system. Sci. Rep. 14, 14017 (2024).
Kuehner, S. M., Irving, A. J., Ziegler, K., Rumble, D., & Hupe, G. 2013. Mineralogy and oxygen isotopic composition of northwest Africa 7822: a unique dunitic achondrite with affinities to the eagle station pallasite grouplet and/or the CV chondrite parent body. (abstract) 76th Annual Meteoritical Society Meeting 5269.
Rider-Stokes, B. G. et al. Impact mixing among rocky protoplanets in the early Solar System from angrite oxygen isotopes. Nat. Astron. 7, 836–842 (2023).
Woodhead, J. & Hergt, J. M. Pb-isotope analyses of USGS reference materials. Geostand. Newsl. 24, 33–38 (2000).
Ludwig, K. R. 2012. Isoplot 4.15: A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Berkeley Geochronology Center Special Publication (Version 4.15). Berkeley Geochronology Center.
Goldmann, A., Brennecka, G., Noordmann, J., Weyer, S. & Wadhwa, M. The uranium isotopic composition of the Earth and Solar System. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 148, 145–158 (2015).
Bodénan, J.-D., Starkey, N. A., Russell, S. S., Wright, I. A. & Franchi, I. A. One of the earliest refractory inclusions and its implications for solar system history. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 286, 214–226 (2020).
Hoppe, P., Cohen, S. & Meibom, A. NanoSIMS: technical aspects and application in cosmochemistry and biological geochemistry. Geostand. Geoanalytical Res. 37, 111–154 (2013).
Catanzaro, E. J., Murphy, T. J., Garner, E. L. & Shields, W. R. Absolute isotopic abundance ratios and atomic weight of magnesium. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. Sect. A Phys. Chem. 70A, 453 (1966).
Davis, A. M. et al. Isotopic mass fractionation laws for magnesium and their effects on 26Al–26Mg systematics in solar system materials. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 158, 245–261 (2015).
Zhang, M. et al. Late pebble accretion of comet 81P/Wild 2 nucleus: evidence from a plagioclase-bearing chondrule fragment, Pyxie. Astrophys. J. 971, 12 (2024).
Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).
Kita, N. T. et al. 26Al-26Mg isotope systematics of the first solids in the early solar system. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 48, 1383–1400 (2013).
Kondev, F. G., Wang, M., Huang, W. J., Naimi, S. & Audi, G. The NUBASE2020 evaluation of nuclear physics properties. Chin. Phys. C. 45, 030001 (2021).
Greenwood, R. C., Burbine, T. H., Miller, M. F. & Franchi, I. A. Melting and differentiation of early-formed asteroids: the perspective from high precision oxygen isotope studies. Geochemistry 77, 1–43 (2017).
Clayton, R. N. & Mayeda, T. K. Oxygen isotope studies of carbonaceous chondrites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 63, 2089–2104 (1999).
Ushikubo, T., Kimura, M., Kita, N. T., Valley, J. W. Primordial oxygen isotope reservoirs in the solar nebula recorded in chondrules in Acfer 094 carbonaceous chondrite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 90, 242–264 (2012).
Acknowledgements
Kay Knight is thanked for her help in sample preparation for SEM analyses. James Malley is thanked for his assistance with laser fluorination. Ben Hoefnagels is greatly thanked for providing the material of NWA 12264. B.R.S. and S.L.J. are supported by an STFC grant (ST/X001180/1) awarded to M.M.G. and Dr Ben Rozitis. L.F.W. is supported by an STFC grant (ST/T000228/1 & ST/X001180/1) awarded to M.A. The NordSIMS facility is supported by Swedish Research Council infrastructure grant 2021-00276; this is NordSIMS contribution # 795.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.G.R.S. initiated the research and formulated the core idea, conducted analysis, interpretation and write-up. X.Z. and I.A.F. carried out Al-Mg analysis via NanoSIMS. S.L.J. led the data analysis and methodology. M.D.S., L.F.W., R.C.G., L.R., M.A., and B.H. contributed to broadening the scope of this work. M.J.W. carried out the Pb-Pb analysis. M.M.G oversaw the project and acquired funding for this work. All authors proofread, reviewed, and revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Earth and Environment thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary handling editors: Ke Zhu and Joseph Aslin. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rider-Stokes, B.G., Zhao, X., Jackson, S.L. et al. Rapid protoplanet formation in the outer Solar System recorded in a dunite from the carbonaceous chondrite reservoir. Commun Earth Environ 6, 524 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02483-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02483-y