Fig. 3: Afterslip, coseismic slip, and static stress maps.
From: Sub-parallel fault afterslip and weak zone relaxation after the 2024 Noto earthquake
A Afterslip distribution using the same fault geometry as the coseismic slip. B Coseismic slip distribution. C The 2-D plane views afterslip distribution overlaid by the coseismic slip contours. Arrows represent the rake directions, and gray dots represent aftershocks. Afterslip models and correlation with stress changes due to the Noto earthquake. D-1, D-2 The shear and normal stress changes on the middle plane are calculated using the receiver fault geometry shown in (A). E-1, E-2 The corresponding stress changes on the same plane, but using a receiver fault geometry shifted 3 km northwards (Supplementary Fig. 10).
