Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Earth & Environment
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications earth & environment
  3. articles
  4. article
A deformation-driven earthquake interaction model for seismicity at Campi Flegrei
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 19 February 2026

A deformation-driven earthquake interaction model for seismicity at Campi Flegrei

  • Sebastian Hainzl  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2875-09331,2,
  • Torsten Dahm1,2 &
  • Anna Tramelli  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6259-57303 

Communications Earth & Environment , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 296 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Geophysics
  • Natural hazards
  • Seismology
  • Volcanology

Abstract

Since 2005, the Campi Flegrei nested caldera volcano, located about 10 km west of Naples, Italy, has experienced accelerating uplift accompanied by increased seismicity, raising concerns in this densely populated area. This ongoing uplift is part of a millennium-long history of inflation-deflation cycles, in which seismicity correlates with uplift phases, albeit nonlinearly. Here, we show that the combination of stress shadowing and loading with frictional fault behavior reproduces the observed long-term seismicity trend. However, in the short term, earthquake clustering occurs, which we demonstrate is at least partly related to earthquake interactions and can be effectively modeled by overlapping aftershock sequences. Merging the long- and short-term approaches yields a combined model that effectively replicates the observed seismicity patterns. A pseudo-prospective test shows that the model can also provide probabilistic short-term forecasts of earthquake rates and maximum magnitudes on weekly to monthly time horizons.

Similar content being viewed by others

Interplay between ground deformation and seismicity during the 2005–2025 unrest at Campi Flegrei

Article Open access 05 December 2025

Accelerating upper crustal deformation and seismicity of Campi Flegrei caldera (Italy), during the 2000–2023 unrest

Article Open access 03 December 2024

Seismic risk mitigation at Campi Flegrei in volcanic unrest

Article Open access 02 December 2024

Data availability

The local catalog is provided by the Observatorio Vesuviano (https://terremoti.ov.ingv.it/gossip/flegrei), which we accessed on February 26, 2025. The HORUS catalog, which provides homogenized magnitudes for earthquakes in Italy since 1960, can be downloaded at https://horus.bo.ingv.it. The GPS data for the RITE station were extracted from Tramelli et al.8 and weekly reports compiled by the Observatorio Vesuviano (https://www.ov.ingv.it/index.php/monitoraggio-e-infrastrutture/bollettini-tutti/settimanali-dei-campi-flegrei). We linearly interpolated these data on equidistant time steps with a step size of 7 days between 1905 and February 5, 2025. The Python codes for parameter estimation and forecasting, as well as for reproducing the manuscript figures, can be found at the Zenodo repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18413119).

References

  1. D’Auria, L. et al. Repeated fluid-transfer episodes as a mechanism for the recent dynamics of Campi Flegrei caldera (1989–2010). J Geophys Res. Solid Earth 116 (2011).

  2. Del Gaudio, C., Aquino, I., Ricciardi, G., Ricco, C. & Scandone, R. Unrest episodes at Campi Flegrei: a reconstruction of vertical ground movements during 1905-2009. J. Volc. Geoth. Res. 195, 48–56 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Forni, F., Degruyter, W., Bachmann, O., De Astis, G. & Mollo, S. Long-term magmatic evolution reveals the beginning of a new caldera cycle at Campi Flegrei. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat9401 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Di Vito, M. et al. Magma transfer at Campi Flegrei caldera (Italy) before the 1538 AD eruption. Sci. Rep. 6, 32245 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ricci, T., Barberi, F., Davis, M. S., Isaia, R. & Nave, R. Volcanic risk perception in the Campi Flegrei area. J. Volc. Geoth. Res. 254, 118–130 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Landro, G. et al. 3d structure and dynamics of Campi Flegrei enhance multi-hazard assessment. Nat. Commun. 16 (2025).

  7. Bellucci Sessa, E. & Milano, G. Ground uplift and seismic activity at Campi Flegrei caldera (southern Italy) during the unrest episodes: an overview. Bull. Geophys. Ocean. 65, 535–556 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tramelli, A. et al. Statistics of seismicity to investigate the Campi Flegrei caldera unrest. Sci. Rep. 11, 7211 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dieterich, J. A constitutive law for rate of earthquake production and its application to earthquake clustering. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 2601–618 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richter, G., Hainzl, S., Dahm, T. & Zöller, G. Stress-based, statistical modeling of the induced seismicity at the Groningen gas field, the Netherlands. Environ. Earth Sci. 79, 1–15 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Acosta, M. et al. Earthquake nucleation characteristics revealed by seismicity response to seasonal stress variations induced by gas production at Groningen. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL105455 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hainzl, S., Dahm, T. & Zöller, G. Modelling induced seismicity in Groningen based on subcritical stressed faults. Geophys. J. Int. 241, 840–851 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hainzl, S. Seismicity patterns of earthquake swarms due to fluid intrusion and stress triggering. Geophys. J. Int. 159, 1090–1096 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hainzl, S., Fischer, T., Čermáková, H., Bachura, M. & Vlček, J. Aftershocks triggered by fluid intrusion: Evidence for the aftershock sequence occurred 2014 in West Bohemia/Vogtland. J. Geophys. Res. 121, 2575–2590 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ogata, Y. Statistical models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for point processes. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 83, 9–27 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hainzl, S. & Ogata, Y. Detecting fluid signals in seismicity data through statistical earthquake modeling. J. Geophys. Res. 110, B05S07 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Llenos, A. L., McGuire, J. J. & Ogata, Y. Modeling seismic swarms triggered by aseismic transients. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 281, 59–69 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Llenos, A. L. & McGuire, J. J. Detecting aseismic strain transients from seismicity data. J. Geophys. Res. 116, B06305 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ricciolino, P., Lo Bascio, D. & Roberta, E. GOSSIP - Database Sismologico Pubblico INGV - Osservatorio Vesuviano. https://terremoti.ov.ingv.it/gossip/ (2024).

  20. Lolli, B., Randazzo, D., Vannucci, G. & Gasperini, P. The homogenized instrumental seismic catalog (HORUS) of Italy from 1960 to the present. Seism. Res. Lett. (2020).

  21. Tan, X. et al. A clearer view of the current phase of unrest at Campi Flegrei caldera. Science 390, 70–75 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kaiser, J. Untersuchungen über das Auftreten von Geräuschen beim Zugversuch. https://books.google.de/books?id=DtpzpwAACAAJ (Technische Hochschule München, 1950)

  23. Utsu, T., Ogata, Y. & Matsut’ura, R. The centenary of the Omori formula for decay law of aftershock seismicity. J. Phys. Earth 43, 1–33 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hainzl, S. & Marsan, D. Dependence of the Omori-Utsu law parameters on main shock magnitude: Observations and modeling. J. Geophys. Res. 113, B10309 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Helmstetter, A., Sornette, D. & Grasso, J. R. Mainshocks are aftershocks of conditional foreshocks: How do foreshock statistical properties emerge from aftershock laws. J. Geophys. Res. 108 (2003).

  26. Scholz, C. H. Earthquakes and friction laws. Nature 391, 37–42 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dieterich, J. Applications of rate- and state-dependent friction to models of fault slip and earthquake occurrence. In Schubert, G. (ed.) Earthquake Seismology, Reatise on Geophysics, Volume 4, 107–129 (Elsevier, 2007).

  28. Hainzl, S., Steacy, D. & Marsan, S. Seismicity models based on Coulomb stress calculations. Community Online Resource for Statistical Seismicity Analysis. Available at http://www.corssa.org (2010).

  29. Cattania, C., Hainzl, S., Wang, L., Enescu, B. & Roth, F. Aftershock triggering by postseismic stresses: a study based on Coulomb rate-and-state models. J. Geophys. Res. 120, 2388–2407 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mancini, S., Segou, M., Werner, M. J. & Cattania, C. Improving physics-based aftershock forecasts during the 2016-2017 Central Italy earthquake cascade. J. Geophys. Res. 124, 8626–8643 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dieterich, J., Cayol, V. & Okube, P. The use of earthquake rate changes as a stress meter at Kilauea volcano. Nature 408, 457–460 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wenzel, F. Fluid-induced seismicity: comparison of rate- and state- and critical pressure theory. Geotherm. Energy 5, 5 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Norbeck, J. H. & Rubinstein, J. L. Hydromechanical earthquake nucleation model forecasts onset, peak, and falling rates of induced seismicity in Oklahoma and Kansas. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 2963–2975 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dahm, T. & Hainzl, S. A Coulomb stress response model for time-dependent earthquake forecasts. J. Geophys. Res. 127, e2022JB024443 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Candela, T. et al. Depletion-induced seismicity at the Groningen gas field: Coulomb rate-and-state models including differential compaction effect. J. Geophys. Res. 124, 7081–7104 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Enescu, B., Hainzl, S. & Ben-Zion, Y. Correlations of seismicity patterns in southern California. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 99, 3114–3123 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lavrov, A. The Kaiser effect in rocks: principles and stress estimation techniques. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. 40, 151–171 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Caliro, S. et al. Escalation of caldera unrest indicated by increasing emission of isotopically light sulfur. Nat. Geosci. 18, 167–174 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Miller, S. A. Aftershocks are fluid-driven and decay rates controlled by permeability dynamics. Nat. Commun. 11, 5787 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hainzl, S. & Fischer, T. Indications for successively triggered rupture growth underlying the 2000 earthquake swarm in Vogtland/NW Bohemia. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 2338 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tramelli, A., Convertito, V. & Godano, C. b value enlightens different rheological behaviour in Campi Flegrei caldera. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 275 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bevilacqua, A. et al. Accelerating upper crustal deformation and seismicity of Campi Flegrei caldera (Italy), during the 2000–2023 unrest. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 742 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kilburn, C. R., Carlino, S., Danesi, S. & Pino, N. A. Potential for rupture before eruption at Campi Flegrei caldera, southern Italy. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 190 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Seif, S., Mignan, A., Zechar, J. D., Werner, M. J. & Wiemer, S. Estimating ETAS: the effects of truncation, missing data, and model assumptions. J. Geophys. Res. 122, 449–469 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ogata, Y. & Katsura, K. Analysis of temporal and spatial heterogeneity of magnitude frequency distribution inferred from earthquake catalogs. Geophys. J. Int. 113, 727–738 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Heimisson, E. R. & Segall, P. Constitutive law for earthquake production based on rate-and-state friction: Dieterich 1994 revisited. J. Geophys. Res. 123, 4141–4156 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Stein, S. & Liu, M. Long aftershock sequences within continents and implications for earthquake hazard assessment. Nature 462 (2009).

  48. Hainzl, S., Page, M. T. & van der Elst, N. J. Onset of aftershocks: constraints on the rate-and-state model. Seism. Res. Lett. 95, 3507–3516 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Daley, D. & Vere-Jones, D. An introduction to the theory of point processes—Volume I: Elementary Theory and Methods, 2nd edn. (Springer, 2003).

  50. Zhuang, J., Harte, D., Werner, M. J., Hainzl, S. & Zhou, S. Basic models of seismicity: temporal models. Community Online Resource for Statistical Seismicity Analysis. Available at http://www.corssa.org (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Yuan-Kai Liu and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive and insightful comments, which greatly helped to improve the manuscript. This study has been partly funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)- Project-ID 318763901 - SFB1294, project B04. Open access funding provided by GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, enabled by Projekt DEAL.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Physics of Earthquakes and Volcanoes, GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany

    Sebastian Hainzl & Torsten Dahm

  2. Institute of Geosciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany

    Sebastian Hainzl & Torsten Dahm

  3. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione di Napoli - Osservatorio Vesuviano, Naples, Italy

    Anna Tramelli

Authors
  1. Sebastian Hainzl
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Torsten Dahm
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anna Tramelli
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.H. Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. T.D. Conceptualization, Investigation, Validation, Visualization, Writing—review & editing. A.T. Investigation, Data curation, Visualization, Writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Hainzl.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Earth and Environment thanks Yuan-Kai Liu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Teng Wang and Joe Aslin [A peer review file is available].

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file

Supplementary Material: A deformation-driven earthquake interaction model for seismicity at Campi Flegrei

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hainzl, S., Dahm, T. & Tramelli, A. A deformation-driven earthquake interaction model for seismicity at Campi Flegrei. Commun Earth Environ (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03296-3

Download citation

  • Received: 15 August 2025

  • Accepted: 03 February 2026

  • Published: 19 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03296-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Editorial policies
  • Conferences
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Earth & Environment (Commun Earth Environ)

ISSN 2662-4435 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing