Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications medicine
  3. articles
  4. article
Machine learning–based cfDNA fragmentation profiling using automated capillary electrophoresis for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 17 February 2026

Machine learning–based cfDNA fragmentation profiling using automated capillary electrophoresis for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Sasimol Udomruk1,
  • Songphon Sutthitthasakul1,2,
  • Nuttida Bunsermvicha3,
  • Kanokwan Pinyopornpanish4,
  • Dumnoensun Pruksakorn1,5,
  • Phasit Charoenkwan6,
  • Petlada Yongpitakwattana1,
  • Kanlaya Khounkaew1,
  • Thanapak Jaimalai  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0004-3342-52131,
  • Treephum Duangsan7,
  • Santhasiri Orrapin1,
  • Sutpirat Moonmuang1,
  • Pitiporn Noisagul  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5351-99981,
  • Arnat Pasena1,
  • Pathacha Suksakit1,
  • Ratikorn Gamngoen1,
  • Pimpisa Teeyakasem1,
  • Chaiyut Charoentum4,
  • Sarawut Kongkarnka8,
  • Worakitti Lapisatepun3 &
  • …
  • Parunya Chaiyawat1 

Communications Medicine , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 877 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer screening
  • Diagnostic markers

Abstract

Background

Early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a significant clinical challenge due to the limited sensitivity of current surveillance tools, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and ultrasound. Recently, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentation analysis has shown promise in cancer detection; however, current sequencing-based approaches remain costly and unsuitable for large-scale screening.

Methods

Here, we introduce a predictive model for early HCC detection called “CEliver” (CfDNA-based automated capillary Electrophoresis method for Liver cancer screening), a model leveraging high-dimensional fragmentation profiling from the intensity distribution of cfDNA fragment lengths using automated capillary electrophoresis. We developed CF-2D features, a computational framework that extracts over 300 quantitative features from electropherogram data, including cfDNA concentration, dominant fragment sizes, two-dimensional shape descriptors, and short-to-long fragment ratios. We integrated these features with AFP levels to build the CEliver model, developed in 111 individuals and validated in an independent cohort of 69 subjects.

Results

Here we show the CF-2D profiles differ significantly between HCC patients and high-risk individuals. The CEliver model achieves 98% sensitivity across all HCC cases, and 96% sensitivity with 99% specificity for early-stage HCC (stage 0/A), substantially outperforming AFP (60% overall sensitivity, 35% for early-stage). In external validation, CEliver shows 88% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

Conclusions

CEliver provides a practical and accurate strategy for early HCC detection. By enabling high-dimensional cfDNA fragmentomics analysis on a widely accessible electrophoresis platform, it bridges the gap between research-grade cfDNA technologies and real-world clinical implementation. This method represents a simple and scalable approach that could potentially be applied in HCC surveillance.

Plain language summary

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a liver cancer that is often diagnosed too late for effective treatment to be used. Here, we developed a computational model to detect HCC early called “CEliver”. The method analyses DNA fragments found in the blood. We developed the model using data from over 100 patients. CEliver accurately distinguishes early-stage HCC from people at risk of disease and performs better than existing diagnosis methods. This simple and scalable approach could be applied for large-scale population screening, helping at-risk people receive earlier diagnosis and treatment, potentially improving survival outcomes.

Similar content being viewed by others

Clinical validation of peripheral blood mononuclear cell DNA methylation markers for accurate early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in Asian patients

Article Open access 30 October 2024

Development of machine learning-based predictors for early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Article Open access 04 March 2024

The expression of FLNA and CLU in PBMCs as a novel screening marker for hepatocellular carcinoma

Article Open access 21 July 2021

Data availability

Source data underlying the analyses in the main figures are available in Supplementary Data. Data underlying Fig. 3A–C are provided as raw data, while data underlying Fig. 3D are provided as a 2D heatmap plot. Source data for Figs. 4B, 4C, 4D, 5A, and 5B are provided as CEliver scores.

Sequencing data and other sensitive information are stored on secure institutional servers at the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. Access to these data is restricted due to ethical and institutional policies. Requests for access should be directed to Dr. Chaiyawat (parunya.chaiyawat@cmu.ac.th) and will be considered subject to institutional approval procedures and policies.

Code availability

To facilitate reproducibility and further research, all scripts for feature extraction, model training, and prediction, as well as a small demonstration dataset, are publicly available on GitHub: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1829735749.

References

  1. Rumgay, H. et al. Global burden of primary liver cancer in 2020 and predictions to 2040. J. Hepatol. 77, 1598–1606 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Samant, H., Amiri, H. S. & Zibari, G. B. Addressing the worldwide hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology, prevention and management. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 12, S361–s373 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Calderon-Martinez, E. et al. Prognostic scores and survival rates by etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: a review. J. Clin. Med. Res. 15, 200–207 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Konyn, P., Ahmed, A. & Kim, D. Current epidemiology in hepatocellular carcinoma. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 15, 1295–1307 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chonprasertsuk, S. & Vilaichone, R. K. Epidemiology and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in Thailand. Jpn J. Clin. Oncol. 47, 294–297 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kanwal, F. & Singal, A. G. Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma: current best practice and future direction. Gastroenterology 157, 54–64 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, B. H., Yang, B. H. & Tang, Z. Y. Randomized controlled trial of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 130, 417–422 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parikh, N. D. et al. Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 29, 2495–2503 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Park, H. J. & Kim, S. Y. Imaging modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: expanding horizons beyond ultrasound. J. Liver Cancer 20, 99–105 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tzartzeva, K. et al. Surveillance imaging and alpha fetoprotein for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 154, 1706–1718.e1701 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Francini, E., Nuzzo, P. V. & Fanelli, G. N. Cell-free DNA: unveiling the future of cancer diagnostics and monitoring. Cancers 16, 662 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gao, Q. et al. Circulating cell-free DNA for cancer early detection. Innovation 3, 100259 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Telekes, A. & Horváth, A. The role of cell-free DNA in cancer treatment decision making. Cancers 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246115 (2022).

  14. Moser, T., Kühberger, S., Lazzeri, I., Vlachos, G. & Heitzer, E. Bridging biological cfDNA features and machine learning approaches. Trends Genet. 39, 285–307 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. An, Y. et al. DNA methylation analysis explores the molecular basis of plasma cell-free DNA fragmentation. Nat. Commun. 14, 287 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou, Q. et al. Epigenetic analysis of cell-free DNA by fragmentomic profiling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2209852119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou, Z. et al. Fragmentation landscape of cell-free DNA revealed by deconvolutional analysis of end motifs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2220982120 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Snyder, M. W., Kircher, M., Hill, A. J., Daza, R. M. & Shendure, J. Cell-free DNA comprises an in vivo nucleosome footprint that informs its tissues-of-origin. Cell 164, 57–68 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Udomruk, S., Orrapin, S., Pruksakorn, D. & Chaiyawat, P. Size distribution of cell-free DNA in oncology. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 166, 103455 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, L. et al. Cell-free DNA testing for early hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance. EBioMedicine 100, 104962 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jin, C. et al. Characterization of fragment sizes, copy number aberrations and 4-mer end motifs in cell-free DNA of hepatocellular carcinoma for enhanced liquid biopsy-based cancer detection. Mol. Oncol. 15, 2377–2389 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nguyen, V. C. et al. Fragment length profiles of cancer mutations enhance detection of circulating tumor DNA in patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer 23, 233 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, X. et al. Ultrasensitive and affordable assay for early detection of primary liver cancer using plasma cell-free DNA fragmentomics. Hepatology 76, 317–329 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, J. et al. Altered cfDNA fragmentation profile in hypomethylated regions as diagnostic markers in breast cancer. Epigenetics Chromatin 16, 33 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Serpas, L. et al. Dnase1l3 deletion causes aberrations in length and end-motif frequencies in plasma DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 641–649 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li, B. et al. DNASE1L3 inhibits proliferation, invasion and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by interacting with β-catenin to promote its ubiquitin degradation pathway. Cell Prolif. 55, e13273 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lapin, M. et al. Fragment size and level of cell-free DNA provide prognostic information in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J. Transl. Med. 16, 300 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cristiano, S. et al. Genome-wide cell-free DNA fragmentation in patients with cancer. Nature 570, 385–389 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Foda, Z. H. et al. Detecting liver cancer using cell-free DNA fragmentomes. Cancer Discov. 13, 616–631 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu, G. et al. A deep-learning model for quantifying circulating tumour DNA from the density distribution of DNA-fragment lengths. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 9, 307–319 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. WHO Screening criteria.

  32. Reig, M. et al. BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update. J. Hepatol. 76, 681–693 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Drefs, M. et al. Changes of long-term survival of resection and liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma throughout the years: A meta-analysis. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 50, 107952 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Toubert, C. et al. Prolonged survival after recurrence in HCC resected patients using repeated curative therapies: Never give up! Cancers 15, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010232 (2022).

  35. Schoenberg, M. B. et al. Resection or transplant in early hepatocellular carcinoma. Dtsch Arztebl Int 114, 519–526 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang, X. et al. Surgical treatment improves overall survival of hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastases after conversion therapy: a multicenter retrospective study. Sci. Rep. 14, 9745 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nakano, K. et al. Fragmentation of cell-free DNA is induced by upper-tract urothelial carcinoma-associated systemic inflammation. Cancer Sci. 112, 168–177 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kim, Y. Y. et al. Failure of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: inadequate echogenic window and macronodular parenchyma as potential culprits. Ultrasonography 38, 311–320 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tsang, S. H. et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of liver tumors in difficult locations. Int J. Hyperth. 38, 56–64 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hong, S. B. et al. Inadequate ultrasound examination in hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Med. 10, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163535 (2021).

  41. Bredno, J., Lipson, J., Venn, O., Aravanis, A. M. & Jamshidi, A. Clinical correlates of circulating cell-free DNA tumor fraction. PLoS One 16, e0256436 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kumar, S. et al. Evaluation of the cell-free DNA integrity index as a liquid biopsy marker to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma from chronic liver disease. Front Mol. Biosci. 9, 1024193 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Elzehery, R. et al. Circulating cell-free DNA and DNA integrity as molecular diagnostic tools in hepatocellular carcinoma. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 158, 254–262 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Huang, A. et al. Detecting circulating tumor DNA in hepatocellular carcinoma patients using droplet digital PCR is feasible and reflects intratumoral heterogeneity. J. Cancer 7, 1907–1914 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yang, D. H. et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma progression in hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis patients receiving nucleoside (acid) analogs therapy: a retrospective cross-sectional study. World J. Gastroenterol. 27, 2025–2038 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rabaan, A. A. et al. Prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis B population within Southeast Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 39,050 participants. Pathogens 12, https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12101220 (2023).

  47. Mittal, S. et al. Role of age and race in the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in veterans with hepatitis B virus infection. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16, 252–259 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sachar, Y., Brahmania, M., Dhanasekaran, R. & Congly, S. E. Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis B. Viruses 13, https://doi.org/10.3390/v13071318 (2021).

  49. Sutthitthasakul, S. Celiver: v1.0.0, <https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18297357> (2026).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research project was supported by the Fundamental Fund 2024, Chiang Mai University, the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, and the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) (grant no. N42A670184), Thailand. We would like to thank all the patients who participated in this study. The graphical abstract, as well as Figs. 1 and 2 were created using BioRender.com.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center of Multidisciplinary Technology for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

    Sasimol Udomruk, Songphon Sutthitthasakul, Dumnoensun Pruksakorn, Petlada Yongpitakwattana, Kanlaya Khounkaew, Thanapak Jaimalai, Santhasiri Orrapin, Sutpirat Moonmuang, Pitiporn Noisagul, Arnat Pasena, Pathacha Suksakit, Ratikorn Gamngoen, Pimpisa Teeyakasem & Parunya Chaiyawat

  2. Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

    Songphon Sutthitthasakul

  3. Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

    Nuttida Bunsermvicha & Worakitti Lapisatepun

  4. Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

    Kanokwan Pinyopornpanish & Chaiyut Charoentum

  5. Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

    Dumnoensun Pruksakorn

  6. Modern Management and Information Technology, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

    Phasit Charoenkwan

  7. Biomedical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

    Treephum Duangsan

  8. Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

    Sarawut Kongkarnka

Authors
  1. Sasimol Udomruk
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Songphon Sutthitthasakul
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nuttida Bunsermvicha
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kanokwan Pinyopornpanish
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dumnoensun Pruksakorn
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Phasit Charoenkwan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Petlada Yongpitakwattana
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kanlaya Khounkaew
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Thanapak Jaimalai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Treephum Duangsan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Santhasiri Orrapin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Sutpirat Moonmuang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Pitiporn Noisagul
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Arnat Pasena
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Pathacha Suksakit
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Ratikorn Gamngoen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Pimpisa Teeyakasem
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Chaiyut Charoentum
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Sarawut Kongkarnka
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Worakitti Lapisatepun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Parunya Chaiyawat
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S. Udomruk: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, validation, visualization, funding acquisition, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing. S. Sutthitthasakul: Formal analysis, software, methodology, validation. N. Bunsermvicha: Resources, data curation, formal analysis. K. Pinyopornpanish, C. Charoentum, S. Kongkarnka, and D. Pruksakorn: Resources, data curation. P. Charoenkwan, T. Jaimalai, T. Duangsan and P. Noisagul: Software, methodology. P. Yongpitakwattana and K. Khounkaew: Investigation, methodology. S. Orrapin and S. Moonmuang: Investigation, validation. A. Pasena, P. Teeyakasem, P. Suksakit and R. Gamngoen: Resources, data curation. W. Lapisatepun: Conceptualization, supervision, resources, validation, funding acquisition, writing–review and editing. P. Chaiyawat: Conceptualization, supervision, methodology, funding acquisition, project administration, resources, validation, visualization, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of this manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Worakitti Lapisatepun or Parunya Chaiyawat.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Sasimol Udomruk, Songphon Sutthitthasakul, Worakitti Lapisatepun, and Parunya Chaiyawat report a petty patent application (Thai-2403001380) currently under review, licensed to CELiver, for the cfDNA-based automated capillary electrophoresis method for liver cancer screening. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Medicine thanks Jilei Liu and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary files

Supplementary Data 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Udomruk, S., Sutthitthasakul, S., Bunsermvicha, N. et al. Machine learning–based cfDNA fragmentation profiling using automated capillary electrophoresis for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Commun Med (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01437-5

Download citation

  • Received: 05 June 2025

  • Accepted: 04 February 2026

  • Published: 17 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01437-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Contact
  • Conferences
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Posters
  • Editorial policies

Publish with us

  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Medicine (Commun Med)

ISSN 2730-664X (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer