Abstract
Precise helical supramolecular polymers of proteins can only be achieved in vivo by tuning complex, competing supramolecular interactions. This formation suggests a level of cellular control that defines functional structures with high fidelity. Achieving such a phenomenon through synthetic reactions is a challenge owing to the lack of native competing interactions. Here we report that synthetic self-assembled polymers spontaneously disassemble to trigger helical growth of protein units to form well-defined protein tubules in vitro. Cryogenic electron microscopy reconstruction at near-atomic resolution reveals uniform protein helical arrays rather than polymorphic arrays. These uniform arrays are similar to natural microtubules, and the aggregated structure of the sacrificed supramolecular ligands within the protein nanotubule is pentameric. The formation of the protein nanotubules, rather than supramolecular polymer of ligands, regulates the physical properties of the solution and the morphology of liposomes. It was shown that enthalpy–entropy compensation provided by the dissociation of aggregated ligands modulates the homogeneity of the helical pattern of the protein nanotubules, shedding light on the creation of sophisticated bionic materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout





Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data required to interpret, verify and extend the results are given in the paper and its Supplementary Information. The maps of nanotubules are deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank under accession codes EMD-60193, EMD-60194 and EMD-60195 for ZE1Gal/SBA, EMD-60192 for BE1Gal/SBA and EMD-60191 for PE2Gal/SBA.
References
Lutz, J.-F., Lehn, J.-M., Meijer, E. W. & Matyjaszewski, K. From precision polymers to complex materials and systems. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16024 (2016).
Rest, C., Kandanelli, R. & Fernández, G. Strategies to create hierarchical self-assembled structures via cooperative non-covalent interactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 2543–2572 (2015).
Johnson, S. et al. Molecular structure of the intact bacterial flagellar basal body. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 712–721 (2021).
Bieling, P. et al. Reconstitution of a microtubule plus-end tracking system in vitro. Nature 450, 1100–1105 (2007).
Kollman, J. M., Polka, J. K., Zelter, A., Davis, T. N. & Agard, D. A. Microtubule nucleating γ-TuSC assembles structures with 13-fold microtubule-like symmetry. Nature 466, 879–882 (2010).
von der Ecken, J. et al. Structure of the F-actin–tropomyosin complex. Nature 519, 114–117 (2015).
Kollman, J. M., Merdes, A., Mourey, L. & Agard, D. A. Microtubule nucleation by γ-tubulin complexes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 709–721 (2011).
Gudimchuk, N. B. & McIntosh, J. R. Regulation of microtubule dynamics, mechanics and function through the growing tip. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 777–795 (2021).
Brouhard, G. J. & Rice, L. M. Microtubule dynamics: an interplay of biochemistry and mechanics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 451–463 (2018).
Weingarten, M. D., Lockwood, A. H., Hwo, S. Y. & Kirschner, M. W. A protein factor essential for microtubule assembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 72, 1858–1862 (1975).
Kellogg, E. H. et al. Near-atomic model of microtubule–tau interactions. Science 360, 1242–1246 (2018).
Alonso, A. C., Grundke-Iqbal, I. & Iqbal, K. Alzheimer’s disease hyperphosphorylated tau sequesters normal tau into tangles of filaments and disassembles microtubules. Nat. Med. 2, 783–787 (1996).
Malay, A. D. et al. An ultra-stable gold-coordinated protein cage displaying reversible assembly. Nature 569, 438–442 (2019).
Šimić, G. et al. Tau protein hyperphosphorylation and aggregation in Alzheimer’s disease and other tauopathies, and possible neuroprotective strategies. Biomolecules 6, 6 (2016).
Otsuka, C. et al. Supramolecular polymer polymorphism: spontaneous helix–helicoid transition through dislocation of hydrogen-bonded π-Rosettes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 22563–22576 (2023).
Sarkar, A., Dhiman, S., Chalishazar, A. & George, S. J. Visualization of stereoselective supramolecular polymers by chirality-controlled energy transfer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 129, 13955–13959 (2017).
Bi, Y. et al. Controlled hierarchical self-assembly of nanoparticles and chiral molecules into tubular nanocomposites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 8529–8539 (2023).
Wang, J. et al. Nucleation-controlled polymerization of nanoparticles into supramolecular structures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 11417–11420 (2013).
Biswas, S. et al. A tubular biocontainer: metal ion-induced 1D assembly of a molecularly engineered chaperonin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 7556–7557 (2009).
Miranda, F. F. et al. A self-assembled protein nanotube with high aspect ratio. Small 5, 2077–2084 (2009).
Luo, Q., Hou, C., Bai, Y., Wang, R. & Liu, J. Protein assembly: versatile approaches to construct highly ordered nanostructures. Chem. Rev. 116, 13571–13632 (2016).
Vantomme, G. & Meijer, E. W. The construction of supramolecular systems. Science 363, 1396–1397 (2019).
Mattia, E. & Otto, S. Supramolecular systems chemistry. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 111–119 (2015).
Ślęczkowski, M. L., Mabesoone, M. F. J., Ślęczkowski, P., Palmans, A. R. A. & Meijer, E. W. Competition between chiral solvents and chiral monomers in the helical bias of supramolecular polymers. Nat. Chem. 13, 200–207 (2021).
Tamaki, K. et al. Photoresponsive supramolecular polymers capable of intrachain folding and interchain aggregation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 22166–22171 (2024).
Su, L. et al. Dilution-induced gel-sol-gel-sol transitions by competitive supramolecular pathways in water. Science 377, 213–218 (2022).
Lehn, J.-M. Perspectives in chemistry—steps towards complex matter. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 2836–2850 (2013).
Li, Z. et al. Chemically controlled helical polymorphism in protein tubes by selective modulation of supramolecular interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 19448–19457 (2019).
de Halleux, V. et al. 1,3,6,8-Tetraphenylpyrene derivatives: towards fluorescent liquid-crystalline columns? Adv. Funct. Mater. 14, 649–659 (2004).
Vybornyi, M. et al. Formation of two-dimensional supramolecular polymers by amphiphilic pyrene oligomers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 11488–11493 (2013).
Hendrikse, S. I. S. et al. Elucidating the ordering in self-assembled glycocalyx mimicking supramolecular copolymers in water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 13877–13886 (2019).
Gupta, D., Cho, M., Cummings, R. D. & Brewer, C. F. Thermodynamics of carbohydrate binding to galectin-1 from Chinese hamster ovary cells and two mutants. A comparison with four galactose-specific plant lectins. Biochemistry 35, 15236–15243 (1996).
Concellón, A., Lu, R.-Q., Yoshinaga, K., Hsu, H.-F. & Swager, T. M. Electric-field-induced chirality in columnar liquid crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 9260–9266 (2021).
Figueira-Duarte, T. M. & Müllen, K. Pyrene-based materials for organic electronics. Chem. Rev. 111, 7260–7314 (2011).
Meisl, G. et al. Molecular mechanisms of protein aggregation from global fitting of kinetic models. Nat. Protoc. 11, 252–272 (2016).
Xia, H. et al. Supramolecular assembly of comb-like macromolecules induced by chemical reactions that modulate the macromolecular interactions in situ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 11106–11116 (2017).
Akhmanova, A. & Kapitein, L. C. Mechanisms of microtubule organization in differentiated animal cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 541–558 (2022).
Breiten, B. et al. Water networks contribute to enthalpy/entropy compensation in protein–ligand binding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 15579–15584 (2013).
Rekharsky, M. & Inoue, Y. Chiral recognition thermodynamics of β-Cyclodextrin: the thermodynamic origin of enantioselectivity and the enthalpy−entropy compensation effect. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 4418–4435 (2000).
Guindani, C., da Silva, L. C., Cao, S., Ivanov, T. & Landfester, K. Synthetic cells: from simple bio-inspired modules to sophisticated integrated systems. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202110855 (2022).
Gao, N. & Mann, S. Membranized coacervate microdroplets: from versatile protocell models to cytomimetic materials. Acc. Chem. Res. 56, 297–307 (2023).
Kimanius, D., Forsberg, B. O., Scheres, S. H. & Lindahl, E. Accelerated cryo-EM structure determination with parallelisation using GPUs in RELION-2. eLife 5, e18722 (2016).
Zuo, T. et al. The multi-slit very small angle neutron scattering instrument at the China Spallation Neutron Source. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 57, 380–391 (2024).
Vanommeslaeghe, K. et al. CHARMM general force field: a force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 671–690 (2010).
Van Der Spoel, D. et al. GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1701–1718 (2005).
Guvench, O. et al. CHARMM additive all-atom force field for carbohydrate derivatives and its utility in polysaccharide and carbohydrate–protein modeling. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 3162–3180 (2011).
Jorgensen, W. L. & Madura, J. D. Quantum and statistical mechanical studies of liquids. 25. Solvation and conformation of methanol in water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105, 1407–1413 (1983).
Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: an N·log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089–10092 (1993).
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
Zivanov, J., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. W. Estimation of high-order aberrations and anisotropic magnification from cryo-EM data sets in RELION-3.1. IUCrJ 7, 253–267 (2020).
Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721–745 (2003).
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010).
De Franceschi, N., Barth, R., Meindlhumer, S., Fragasso, A. & Dekker, C. Dynamin A as a one-component division machinery for synthetic cells. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 70–76 (2024).
De Franceschi, N. et al. Synthetic membrane shaper for controlled liposome deformation. ACS Nano 17, 966–978 (2023).
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).
Acknowledgements
G.C. and L.L. thank NSFC/China (grant nos. 52125303, 52403179, and 92356305 and 22431002), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2023YFA0915300) and Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (grant no. 2023ZKZD02) for financial support. M.L. thanks NSFC/China (grant nos. 92156023 and 92356306) for financial support. This research is also supported by the Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF under grant no. GZC20240273. We thank the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (Bio-SAXS: BL19U2) for the SAXS test. We also thank the Spallation Neutron Source Science Center in Dongguan for neutron scattering experiments with the help of H. Cheng, T. Zuo, H. Zhu and X. Liu.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.Y., L.L. and G.C. conceptualized and administered the project and wrote the paper. L.Y. performed the synthesis of all the ligands and studied the self-assembly of ligands and protein by spectroscopy experiments. L.L. performed the molecular dynamics simulations. L.Y. and X.D. performed the cryo-EM experiment. L.L. performed the cryo-EM images processing, model building and refinement. C.W. performed the microfluidics experiment. Y.L. and M.L. analysed and interpreted the results, and involved in revision of the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Synthesis thanks Huaimin Wang, Shiki Yagai and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Alison Stoddart, in collaboration with the Nature Synthesis team.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–53, discussion, and Schemes 1 and 2.
Supplementary Data 1
Validation report of macromolecular structures.
Supplementary Data 2
Validation report of macromolecular structures.
Supplementary Data 3
Validation report of macromolecular structures.
Supplementary Data 4
Validation report of macromolecular structures.
Supplementary Data 5
Validation report of macromolecular structures.
Source data
Source Data Fig. 2
Statistical source data.
Source Data Fig. 3
Statistical source data.
Source Data Fig. 5
Statistical source data.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ye, L., Dong, X., Wang, C. et al. Helical protein nanotubules assembled from sacrificial supramolecular polymers. Nat. Synth 4, 562–572 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-024-00726-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-024-00726-y
This article is cited by
-
Energy landscape modulation enables helicity overriding in supramolecular copolymers
Nature Synthesis (2025)
-
Producing protein nanotubes by sacrificing nanofibres
Nature Synthesis (2025)