Table 3 Results from the model predicting BFS internalizing symptoms in the full sample

From: Randomized trial testing a self-guided digital mental health intervention teaching calming skills for Ukrainian children

Fixed effects

b

SE

z

p

OR

CI

Intercept

-1.18

0.19

-6.22

<.001***

0.31

[0.21, 0.45]

Condition (Control)

0.02

0.11

0.15

0.885

1.02

[0.82, 1.26]

Time: 1-month assessment

0.16

0.10

1.59

0.111

1.17

[0.96, 1.43]

Time: 2-month assessment

0.56

0.10

5.64

<.001***

1.75

[1.44, 2.13]

1-month assessment * condition

-0.02

0.14

-0.13

0.901

0.98

[0.75, 1.29]

2-month assessment * condition

0.14

0.14

1.00

0.319

1.15

[0.88, 1.50]

Random effects

N

Variance

SD

Participant ID (Intercept)

624

0.40

0.63

Site (Intercept)

4

0.12

0.34

 

R2

Conditional

0.46

Marginal

0.06

  1. Note. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; For fixed effects, OR represents the between-groups effect size (odds ratio). Each row represents a fixed effect in our generalized linear mixed-effects model with youth internalizing symptoms as the outcome. For example, as shown in the second row, the main effect of intervention condition did not significantly predict youth internalizing symptoms.
Back to article page