Table 3 Little evidence for order bias in past studies
From: The order of task decisions and confidence ratings has little effect on metacognition
Study | Task | D → C | C → D | t-statistic | 95% confidence interval | p-value | Bayes factor | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Participants | mean m-ratio | Participants | mean m-ratio | ||||||
Wierzchoń et al. 201414 | face gender identification | 23 | 0.907 | 19 | 2.575 | –0.949 | [–5.357, 2.021] | 0.355 | 0.470 |
Siedlecka et al. 201615 | anagram detection | 34 | 1.069 | 31 | 0.869 | 0.883 | [–0.252, 0.651] | 0.381 | 0.355 |
Siedlecka et al. 201843 | anagram detection | 47 | 0.918 | 49 | 0.620 | 0.948 | [–0.331, 0.926] | 0.347 | 0.315 |
Siedlecka et al. 2019 (experiment 1)17 | word memory | 20 | 0.972 | 18 | 0.113 | 10.514 | [0.692, 1.025] | 1.078 × 10–11 | 4.691 × 109 |
Siedlecka et al. 2019 (experiment 2)17 | word memory | 26 | 0.870 | 29 | 0.839 | 0.470 | [-0.102, 0.164] | 0.641 | 0.298 |
Aggregated data | 150 | 0.949 | 146 | 0.909 | 0.157 | [–0.469, 0.551] | 0.875 | 0.129 | |
