Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Structural alignment for energy–computation co-design

Artificial intelligence systems are becoming gigawatt-scale, always-on workloads that today’s power systems were not built to carry. Capacity expansion and short-term coordination alone cannot close this gap. Here, we argue that alignment requires a structural perspective: enabling energy and computation systems to interpret each other’s structural organization and evolving constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Structural alignment between energy and computation.

References

  1. International Energy Agency. AI is Set to Drive Surging Electricity Demand from Data Centres while Offering the Potential to Transform How the Energy Sector Works https://go.nature.com/3Zz6yda (2025).

  2. Mills, J. NVIDIA Launches Omniverse DSX Blueprint, Enabling Global AI Infrastructure Ecosystem to Build Gigawatt-Scale AI Factories https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/omniverse-dsx-blueprint/ (2025).

  3. Xie, L., Li, N. & Poor, H. V. Sustainable electrification in the era of AI. Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng. 1, 493–494 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. US Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy. Advantages and Challenges of Nuclear-Powered Data Centers https://go.nature.com/4bOaCO9 (2025).

  5. International Energy Agency. Energy Supply for AI https://go.nature.com/4kz1hvJ (2024).

  6. Lin, H. et al. Power system and communication network co-simulation for smart grid applications. IEEE ISGT (2011).

  7. Ruan, J., Xu, Z. & Su, H. Towards interdisciplinary integration of electrical engineering and earth science. Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng. 1, 278–279 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Censi, A. Uncertainty in monotone codesign problems. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2, 1556–1563 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Helbing, D. Globally networked risks and how to respond. Nature 497, 51–59 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, Y., Slotine, J. & Barabási, A. Controllability of complex networks. Nature 473, 167–173 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72331009), the Shenzhen Key Lab of Crowd Intelligence Empowered Low-Carbon Energy Network (ZDSYS20220606100601002), the Australian Research Council Research Hub (IH180100020), and the Australian Research Council Linkage Project (LP240200586).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xin Lu, Jing Qiu or Junhua Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, X., Qiu, J., Wang, X. et al. Structural alignment for energy–computation co-design. Nat Rev Electr Eng (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44287-026-00273-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44287-026-00273-y

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing