Table 3 Material supply risks across scenarios, categorized as extreme risk (consumption ratio ≥ 75%) and high risk (50% ≤ ratio < 75%)
From: Understanding supply chain constraints for the US clean energy transition
Scenario | Extreme risk materials | High risk materials |
|---|---|---|
Baseline | Nickel (102.39%) | Praseodymium (63.01%) |
Terbium (99.94%) | Manganese (53.46%) | |
Silicon (97.17%) | ||
Neodymium (76.95%) | ||
Gallium (78.99%) | ||
Selenium (78.16%) | ||
Indium (75.54%) | ||
Case Study 1 | Nickel (102.72%) | Manganese (64.53%) |
Neodymium (100.00%) | ||
Silicon (99.42%) | ||
Praseodymium (91.32%) | ||
Gallium (79.77%) | ||
Selenium (77.44%) | ||
Indium (76.31%) | ||
Case Study 2 | Nickel (101.53%) | Balsa (66.15%) |
Silicon (100.63%) | Manganese (57.91%) | |
Neodymium (100.00%) | Gallium (53.05%) | |
Praseodymium (100.00%) | Indium (50.62%) | |
Selenium (100.00%) | ||
Tellurium (100.00%) |
