Table 2 Control centrality of empirical networks.

From: Control efficacy of complex networks

Data Sets

Nodes

Edges

r max

r min

Adjnoun56

112

425

0.97377

0.98214

0.97321

0.97481

0.98214

0.97321

Dolphins57

62

159

0.96878

0.98387

0.96774

0.97633

0.98387

0.96774

Football58

115

615

1

1

1

1

1

1

karate club59

34

78

0.69983

0.73529

0.67647

0.80536

0.82353

0.79412

Lesmis60

77

254

0.61899

0.63636

0.61039

0.84702

0.85714

0.84416

Netscience56

1589

2742

0.04060

0.16174

0.00063

0.07580

0.26306

0.00063

Polbooks61

105

441

1

1

1

1

1

1

Power24

4941

6594

0.84098

0.84739

0.80935

0.87344

0.88241

0.82372

Hep-th62

8361

15751

0.39915

0.57218

0.00012

0.45460

0.65184

0.00012

Email63

1133

5451

0.96125

0.96204

0.96028

0.96163

0.96293

0.96117

Jazz64

198

2742

0.96500

0.96970

0.96464

0.96740

0.96970

0.96465

USAir65

332

2126

0.76639

0.77410

0.76205

0.76944

0.77410

0.76506

  1. For each network, its size, the total number of links, the average value, its maximum and minimum values for identical link weights and random link weights, are given. The structural data of all the networks are available online (see Supplementary Table 1). Superscript W represents random weights.
Back to article page