Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Comment

Filter By:

  • Drug developers are increasingly applying data-driven analysis of the actions of regulatory agencies to gain insights into their expectations and applications of regulatory policy, but such strategies can be limited by the availability and quality of regulatory datasets. Here, we discuss how establishing a single, robust, accessible database of FDA regulatory actions could help address this limitation.

    • Andrew S. Robertson
    • Alexis Reisin Miller
    • Felipe Dolz
    Comment
  • Regulatory agencies can provide advice to support developers of digital technologies for medicines use, but what are the best strategies to maximize the chance of a successful regulatory interaction? Here, EMA and industry representatives comment on the experience so far.

    • Francesca Cerreta
    • Armin Ritzhaupt
    • Spiros Vamvakas
    Comment
  • Consortia are enabling drug discovery in areas that individual organizations are unable to support alone because of the high risk or the need to pool information. This article discusses desirable features that can underpin the success of such consortia.

    • Peter B. Simpson
    • Graeme F. Wilkinson
    Comment
  • The Innovative Medicines Initiative Consortium RESOLUTE has started to develop tools and produce data sets to de-orphanize transporters in the solute carrier protein (SLC) superfamily, thereby lowering the barrier for the scientific community to explore SLCs as an attractive drug target class.

    • Giulio Superti-Furga
    • Daniel Lackner
    • Claire M. Steppan
    Comment
  • Using human-relevant, translational in vitro models is widely considered to reduce attrition during drug discovery and development. Despite this, the adoption of models based on microphysiological systems — organs-on-chips or organoids — by pharma companies is moderate at best, and realizing the full potential of these models will need greater collaboration between stakeholders.

    • Lorna Ewart
    • Adrian Roth
    Comment
  • Therapeutic options in response to the 2019-nCoV outbreak are urgently needed. Here, we discuss the potential for repurposing existing antiviral agents to treat 2019-nCoV infection (now known as COVID-19), some of which are already moving into clinical trials.

    • Guangdi Li
    • Erik De Clercq
    Comment
  • Numerous potential therapeutic targets are being investigated in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Here, we discuss a platform trial approach for designing proof-of-concept (POC) clinical studies of ASD — via the Autism Spectrum POC Initiative (ASPI) — that can be conducted through a public–private partnership with the aim of finding effective treatments in the most expeditious manner.

    • Seth Ness
    • Gahan Pandina
    • Husseini K. Manji
    Comment
  • This year marks the tenth anniversary of the TREAT-NMD Advisory Committee for Therapeutics (TACT), a group of multidisciplinary experts that evaluates drug development programmes for rare neuromuscular diseases and identifies pitfalls. Here, we discuss the experience with TACT based on its reviews of more than 50 applications and its potential as a model for other rare disorders.

    • Kathryn R. Wagner
    • Annamaria De Luca
    • Volker Straub
    Comment
  • Cloud-based systems for data submitted by sponsors to drug regulatory agencies have the potential to accelerate drug development, streamline regulatory review and enhance regulatory decision-making. Here, we provide a vision for integrating cloud-enabled practices in drug regulation globally.

    • Andrew S. Robertson
    • Hilary Malone
    • Max Wegner
    Comment
  • A lack of robust knowledge of the number of rare diseases and the number of people affected by them limits the development of approaches to ameliorate the substantial cumulative burden of rare diseases. Here, we call for coordinated efforts to more precisely define rare diseases.

    • Melissa Haendel
    • Nicole Vasilevsky
    • Tudor I. Oprea
    Comment
  • The European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration have committed to engaging patients in their regulatory processes to promote patient-focused medicinal product development, as well as improve transparency and trust in the regulatory system. Here, we highlight exchanges of experience between the agencies and some impacts on patient engagement.

    • Maria Mavris
    • Andrea Furia Helms
    • Nathalie Bere
    Comment
  • Real-world evidence is increasingly valued by regulators and payers. Central to this evidence base is patient-reported outcome data describing the impact of drugs on quality of life, daily activities and symptoms. Here, we highlight key challenges with current real-world, patient-reported outcome data and describe collaborative next steps for international stakeholders to overcome these issues.

    • Melanie J. Calvert
    • Daniel J. O’Connor
    • Ethan M. Basch
    Comment
  • It is increasingly important that regulatory agencies catalyse the translation of scientific and technological innovation into improved patient-centred health care. Here, we highlight the strategic goals of the European Medicines Agency to advance regulatory science and optimize the opportunities arising in areas such as cell and gene therapies, big data and artificial intelligence.

    • Philip A. Hines
    • Richard H. Guy
    • Marisa Papaluca-Amati
    Comment
  • One aspect of the ongoing debate about drug pricing is the added therapeutic benefit of new drugs compared with existing — and potentially cheaper — therapies. Here, we discuss the merits and pitfalls of proposals that are being discussed with regard to the role of regulatory agencies in establishing added therapeutic benefit.

    • Hans-Georg Eichler
    • Harald Enzmann
    • Guido Rasi
    Comment
  • The Biomarkers Consortium aims to facilitate drug development with biomarkers across a range of diseases. Here, we briefly highlight its accomplishments so far and its recent expansion in scope to include related tools along the lines of the Biomarkers, EndpointS and other Tools (BEST) resource, such as patient-reported outcomes and clinical outcome assessments.

    • Joseph P. Menetski
    • Christopher P. Austin
    • John A. Wagner
    Comment
  • Investment in drug development for neurodevelopmental disorders has suffered from recent failures in clinical trials that were based on promising preclinical findings. Here, we discuss development and validation of translational biomarkers of neurodevelopmental disorders that can enable more informative clinical experiments and translational success in these diseases.

    • Mustafa Sahin
    • Stephanie R. Jones
    • Laura A. Mamounas
    Comment
  • The development of oncology drugs traditionally begins by studying them in heavily pretreated patients, and then working ‘upstream’ to populations with earlier-stage disease. The recent FDA approval of an androgen receptor antagonist first in prostate cancer patients without demonstrable metastatic disease but at high-risk for metastasis, based on a novel metastasis-free survival end point developed by the FDA, could provide a template for a paradigm shift.

    • William N. Hait
    • Peter F. Lebowitz
    Comment

Search

Quick links