Filter By:

Journal Check one or more journals to show results from those journals only.

Choose more journals

Article type Check one or more article types to show results from those article types only.
Subject Check one or more subjects to show results from those subjects only.
Date Choose a date option to show results from those dates only.

Custom date range

Clear all filters
Sort by:
Showing 1–4 of 4 results
Advanced filters: Author: Merridee A Wouters Clear advanced filters
  • Clinical proteomics critically depends on the ability to acquire highly reproducible data over an extended period of time. Here, the authors assess reproducibility over four months across different mass spectrometers and develop a computational approach to mitigate variation among instruments over time.

    • Rebecca C. Poulos
    • Peter G. Hains
    • Qing Zhong
    ResearchOpen Access
    Nature Communications
    Volume: 11, P: 1-13
  • Young et al. report on the diversity in regulation of nematode apoptosis. Results indicate that the apoptotic pathways of C. elegans are not fully representative of nematodes generally.

    • Neil D. Young
    • Tiffany J. Harris
    • W. Douglas Fairlie
    ResearchOpen Access
    Communications Biology
    Volume: 3, P: 1-12
  • Recent trends within computational and data sciences show an increasing recognition and adoption of computational workflows as tools for productivity and reproducibility that also democratize access to platforms and processing know-how. As digital objects to be shared, discovered, and reused, computational workflows benefit from the FAIR principles, which stand for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. The Workflows Community Initiative’s FAIR Workflows Working Group (WCI-FW), a global and open community of researchers and developers working with computational workflows across disciplines and domains, has systematically addressed the application of both FAIR data and software principles to computational workflows. We present recommendations with commentary that reflects our discussions and justifies our choices and adaptations. These are offered to workflow users and authors, workflow management system developers, and providers of workflow services as guidelines for adoption and fodder for discussion. The FAIR recommendations for workflows that we propose in this paper will maximize their value as research assets and facilitate their adoption by the wider community.

    • Sean R. Wilkinson
    • Meznah Aloqalaa
    • Carole Goble
    Comments & OpinionOpen Access
    Scientific Data
    Volume: 12, P: 1-9