Abstract
THE fallacy of trusting for scientific information to any other than a recognised scientific source, cannot be better illustrated than by Mr. Pocklington's letter in your issue of Nov. 3. He there seems to thinks that the statements of the editor of a volume of popular poems on a matter of science are worthy of notice, and therefore thinks it worth while to inquire whether or not it is true that no aurora borealis ever appeared before 1715. The absurdity of such a rash statement is so apparent that it seems almost superfluous to show it. In 1754 a book was published by M. de Mairan, entitled, “Traité Physique et Historique d e l'Aurore Boréale,” in which he collects from all the writers, ancient and modern up to that date, accounts of all the Auroræ Boreales which had been seen. Their total number amounts to 1,441 between the years A.D. 583 and 1751.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
EARWAKER, J. The Earliest Mention of the Aurora Borealis. Nature 3, 46 (1870). https://doi.org/10.1038/003046b0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/003046b0


