Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

[Letters to Editor]

Abstract

I HAVE followed the discussion in your columns on “Intellect in Brutes” attentively, and I maintain that Mr. Henslow's distinction between man's power of abstract reasoning, and the reasoning of animals from objects present to the senses (a faculty they certainly possess, if the theory of deductive reasoning, that all inference is from particulars to particulars be accepted, which, however, cannot be proved), is perfectly valid, in spite of any accidental errors of illustration.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BARCLAY, H. [Letters to Editor]. Nature 20, 147–148 (1879). https://doi.org/10.1038/020147e0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/020147e0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing