Abstract
FROM the abstract of Proceedings of the Geological Society (January 5) I learn with surprise that Sir R. Murchison's interpretation of the succession of the beds over the region north of the Caledonian Canal is disputed, and that the relations of the fossiliferous limestone of Durness to the quartzites “are” (according to Dr. Callaway) “by no means satisfactorily established, and that their conformity is rendered dubious by a marked discordance of strike;” in fact that the limestone lies in a synclinal basin amongst the quartzites, so that if the lime stone be of Lower Silurian (“Arenig”) age the quartzites and schists must be older; this I presume to be the inference Dr. Callaway intends to draw, as he says there “is no proof of the Lower Silurian age of the quartzite and newer series of flaggy gneiss and schist” constituting the interior mountainous district.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
HULL, E. The Geological Age of the North Highlands of Scotland. Nature 23, 289–290 (1881). https://doi.org/10.1038/023289b0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/023289b0


