Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Weight and Mass

Abstract

TILL some quite new facts are discovered, such as shall force us to reconsider our convictions (which have not been lightly formed), I do not think it profitable to accept a quasi-metaphysical challenge from my friend Prof. Greenhill. He has at heart, as strongly as I have, the cause of definiteness and accuracy:—and if he, as is natural for one in his position, feels inclined to sympathise with the “vernacular” of Engineers rather than object to it as I do, there is nothing for it but to agree to differ. My remarks on this aspect of the subject were of the most cursory and general character; and I went so far as to say that, as the book in question was written by a practical man for practical men, “perhaps we ought not to complain.”

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

T., P. Weight and Mass. Nature 35, 512 (1887). https://doi.org/10.1038/035512a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/035512a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing