Abstract
ALLOW me to state that the results of my experiments on Cape scorpions are in full accord with Prof. Bourne's conclusion that the poison of the scorpion has no fatal effect on the same individual or another individual of the same or even of another species. Speaking before the South African Philosophical Society in February 1883, I said:—“Members of the Society will see on the table a scorpion of the larger (Cape) species. That scorpion I caught at 11 o'clock this morning. I at once pierced him in three places with his own sting, on which in each case there was a drop of poison. In the last inoculation I held the sting in the wound, and squeezing the ‘bulb of the sting’ with the pincers forcibly injected poison. The creature is alive and active” (Proceedings for 1883). These and subsequent experiments, however, led me to believe that the poison has some effect, causing sluggishness and torpor for a while. I quite agree with Prof. Bourne that it is physically possible for a scorpion to sting itself in a vulnerable place; and though I never was able to observe the infliction of a wound on itself by any scorpion, I can well believe that this is possible, but, I am convinced, wholly accidental.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MORGAN, C. Scorpion Virus. Nature 35, 535 (1887). https://doi.org/10.1038/035535a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/035535a0


