Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Functional Organs

Abstract

IT is evident from the letter of the Duke of Argyll under this heading in your issue of August 9 (p. 341), that he has altogether misconstrued some of the main biological principles which Darwin promulgated; and it also appears as if the entire neglect of certain important items which received due consideration in the “Origin of Species” is either done with purpose, or else is simply an effect of obscuration. In either case, the fallacious interpretation may be due to the polemical style in which his Grace is usually wont to distinguish himself, and the strong bias imported into the treatment has rendered a true representation of the conclusions he assails altogether impossible.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WHITE, W. Functional Organs. Nature 38, 412–413 (1888). https://doi.org/10.1038/038412a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/038412a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing