Abstract
THE theory of sexual selection never pretended to explain unisexual inheritance. Its author started with a fact:—“Inasmuch as peculiarities often appear under domestication in one sex and become hereditarily attached to that sex, so no doubt it will be under nature” (“Origin of Species,” 6th ed. p. 69).1 Neither does the theory of natural selection pretend to explain ordinary, i.e. bisexual, inheritance. But Mr. Cunningham pretends that his theory does explain unisexual inheritance, and having in spite of the statement contained in the concluding sentence of the above letter—given very full consideration to his views, I have come to the opposite conclusion. I repeat that his theory does not explain unisexual inheritance.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MELDOLA, R. Sexual Dimorphism. Nature 63, 299 (1901). https://doi.org/10.1038/063299c0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/063299c0


