Abstract
MR. JOHN R. HENRY, according to his letters in NATURE of January 2 and 23, unfortunately looked out too late for the Quadrantids, owing to having miscalculated the time of maximum, the approximate probable time of which might also have been obtained from the British Astronomical Association. He is right in saying that the date of the shower is advancing into the year, but the advance is slower than he thinks. Taking the data he gives, which, however, are only very rough, and also a consideration of the sun's longitude as given in the “Nautical Almanac,” there is an advance of only five hours in the thirty-seven years 1825 to 1862. It would appear that in the forty years from then a further advance of probably about eight hours has taken place. It is unfortunate that Prof. A. S. Herschel has not published the exact number of meteors he saw from hour to hour on January 2, 1900, when he watched from 11h. to 16h. 30m. He, however, states that the frequency continued about the same during the whole period, and seeing the radiant point was rising all that period, this would mean that the maximum was near the beginning of his watch.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BACKHOUSE, T. The Quadrantid Meteors. Nature 65, 439 (1902). https://doi.org/10.1038/065439c0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/065439c0


