Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Use of the Word “Telephotography”

Abstract

NATURE of August 29 contained an article by Dr. Shelford Bidwell entitled “Practical Telephotography.” May I enter a protest against the use of the word “telephotography” to describe the method of transmitting pictures to a distance? Without wishing to go into the merit of the term, I would point out that it has been applied for years to photography by means of a lens consisting of a negative as well as a positive element, as in the well-known “telephoto” lens of Dallmeyer. There is already an extensive literature in which the term “telephotography” is used with this meaning, and to employ it now to describe something totally different can only ultimately result in confusion. Would it not be better to employ the term customarily employed, viz. “phototelegraphy”?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BAYLEY, R. Use of the Word “Telephotography”. Nature 76, 546 (1907). https://doi.org/10.1038/076546a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/076546a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing