Abstract
NATURE of August 29 contained an article by Dr. Shelford Bidwell entitled “Practical Telephotography.” May I enter a protest against the use of the word “telephotography” to describe the method of transmitting pictures to a distance? Without wishing to go into the merit of the term, I would point out that it has been applied for years to photography by means of a lens consisting of a negative as well as a positive element, as in the well-known “telephoto” lens of Dallmeyer. There is already an extensive literature in which the term “telephotography” is used with this meaning, and to employ it now to describe something totally different can only ultimately result in confusion. Would it not be better to employ the term customarily employed, viz. “phototelegraphy”?
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BAYLEY, R. Use of the Word “Telephotography”. Nature 76, 546 (1907). https://doi.org/10.1038/076546a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/076546a0


