Abstract
MR. DEELEY'S suggestion (NATURE, January 16, p. 385) that the cyclone is caused by the high temperature of the stratosphere does not seem to me to be feasible for the following reason:—Owing to the temperature inversion, or, at least, to the cessation of the lapse of temperature with height, the boundary between the troposphere and stratosphere is, in general, perfectly definite, as definite almost as the boundary between layers of oil and water would be. If, then, any sort of sucking action—to use an incorrect but convenient expression—were exerted by the lightness of the air above the boundary, it ought to draw up the boundary itself as well as the air below it. This is exactly the reverse of what happens; the boundary bulges out downwards in the cyclone and upwards in the anticyclone.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DINES, W. Cyclones. Nature 102, 425 (1919). https://doi.org/10.1038/102425a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/102425a0


