Abstract
MR. BARNARD'S letter in NATURE of December 29 last, p. 566, is unusually dogmatic as a contribution to a scientific discussion. As the title of this correspondence indicates, the original letter was written, not so much to direct attention to a particular method as to a general principle, with the intention of increasing the comfort of workers who have to work long hours at the microscope. It appears that Mr. Barnard has arrived at the same principle independently, but in a case of this nature there is no excuse for withholding, from publication a matter which affects the well-being of a large number of workers.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DENHAM, H. Microscope Illumination and Fatigue. Nature 109, 78 (1922). https://doi.org/10.1038/109078a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/109078a0


