Abstract
IT has been stated by several critics that the word “Australopithecus” is a hybrid (Latin-Greek) term. I am indebted to my colleague Mr. T. J. Haarhoff, professor of classics in the University of the Witwatersrand, for the information that pithecus was a recognised naturalised Latin word in Rome. It was used by Cicero's own secretary Tiro and by other accredited writers, and more than a century before Cicero's time Plautus employed the diminutive pithecium. It is, therefore, not surprising that both of these words are to be found in a standard Latin dictionary, such as that of Lewis and Short. The still commoner cercopithecus is found in Pliny, Varro, Juvenal and Martial, to the last-named of whom (Book xiv. Epigram 202) we owe one of the most pleasing examples of the indiscriminate juxtaposition of the two words used by polished Romans for a monkey:
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DART, R. The Word “Australopithecus” and Others. Nature 115, 875 (1925). https://doi.org/10.1038/115875b0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/115875b0


