Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The Word “Australopithecus” and Others

Abstract

IT has been stated by several critics that the word “Australopithecus” is a hybrid (Latin-Greek) term. I am indebted to my colleague Mr. T. J. Haarhoff, professor of classics in the University of the Witwatersrand, for the information that pithecus was a recognised naturalised Latin word in Rome. It was used by Cicero's own secretary Tiro and by other accredited writers, and more than a century before Cicero's time Plautus employed the diminutive pithecium. It is, therefore, not surprising that both of these words are to be found in a standard Latin dictionary, such as that of Lewis and Short. The still commoner cercopithecus is found in Pliny, Varro, Juvenal and Martial, to the last-named of whom (Book xiv. Epigram 202) we owe one of the most pleasing examples of the indiscriminate juxtaposition of the two words used by polished Romans for a monkey:

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DART, R. The Word “Australopithecus” and Others. Nature 115, 875 (1925). https://doi.org/10.1038/115875b0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/115875b0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing