Abstract
PROF. JOLY in his beautiful work on pleochroic haloes in mica has stressed the importance of a small discrepancy in the observed position of the first halo ring. The discrepancy was shown to vary with the age of the rock. It was recognised that the influence of actinium in the formation of these uranium haloes had not been taken into account, but it did not seem possible that the actinium series could have any appreciable effect since it is regarded as only a 3 per cent, off-shoot from the main uranium series. Certainly it could not account for a shifting inner ring, and Prof. Joly suggested that the type of thing needed was a variable decay-constant for uranium—such as would arise if uranium had an isotope of considerably shorter life than uranium I. But it can be shown that more than one additional α-ray is needed to account for the observed shifts.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WILKINS, T. The Actinium Series and the Lead Ratios in Rocks. Nature 117, 719–720 (1926). https://doi.org/10.1038/117719b0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/117719b0


