Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Difference between the Absorption and the Raman Spectrum

Abstract

SEVERAL investigators have recently stated that in many cases Raman lines are found which do not correspond with infra-red absorption frequencies (Carelli, Pringsheim, and Rosen, Zs. f. Phys., 51, p. 511; 1928: Czerny, ibid., 53, p. 317; 1929: McLennan and McLeod, NATURE, 123, p. 160; 1929: Ellis, ibid., p. 205: Rasetti, ibid., 205: R. W. Wood, ibid., p. 279, and others). Several authors state this as contrary to the theoretical expectations. The purpose of this note is to direct attention to the fact that the abovementioned phenomena, far from being a contradiction to the theory, really furnish a very good proof for the validity of the Kramers' theory of dispersion, which includes the theory of the Raman effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DIEKE, G. Difference between the Absorption and the Raman Spectrum. Nature 123, 564 (1929). https://doi.org/10.1038/123564a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/123564a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing