Abstract
Converging evidence supports a role for mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic systems in a subject's ability to shift behavior in response to changing stimulus-reward contingencies. To characterize the dopaminergic mechanisms involved in this function, we quantified the effects of subtype-specific dopamine (DA) receptor antagonists on acquisition, retention, and reversal of a visual discrimination task in non-human primates (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus). We used a modified Wisconsin General Test Apparatus that was equipped with three food boxes, each fitted with a lid bearing a unique visual cue; one of the cues concealed a food reward, whereas the other two concealed an empty box. The monkeys were trained first to acquire a novel discrimination (eg A+, B−, C−) in a single session, before experiencing either a reversal of the discrimination (eg A−, B+, C−) or the acquisition of a completely new discrimination (eg D+, E−, F−), on the following day. Systemic administration of the D2/D3 receptor antagonist raclopride (0.001–0.03 mg/kg) failed to significantly affect the performance of reversal learning when reversal sessions were run without a retention session. But, raclopride (0.03 mg/kg) significantly impaired performance under the reversal condition when reversal sessions were run right after a retention session; however, it did not affect acquisition of a novel visual discrimination. Specifically, raclopride significantly increased the number of reversal errors made before reaching the performance criterion in the reversal, but not in new learning sessions. In contrast, the D1/D5 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 did not significantly modulate acquisition of a novel discrimination or reversal learning at doses (0.001–0.03 mg/kg, i.m.) that did not suppress behavior generally. In addition, none of the drug treatments affected retention of a previously learned discrimination. The results strongly suggest that D2/D3 receptors, but not D1/D5 receptors, selectively mediate reversal learning, without affecting the capacity to learn a new stimulus-reward association. These data support the hypothesis that phasic DA release, acting through D2-like receptors, mediates behavioral flexibility.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Arnsten AF, Cai JX, Murphy BL, Goldman-Rakic PS (1994). Dopamine D1 receptor mechanisms in the cognitive performance of young adult and aged monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 116: 143–151.
Arnsten AF, Cai JX, Steere JC, Goldman-Rakic PS (1995). Dopamine D2 receptor mechanisms contribute to age-related cognitive decline: the effects of quinpirole on memory and motor performance in monkeys. J Neurosci 15: 3429–3439.
Aron AR, Robbins TW, Poldrack RA (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 8: 170–177.
Bilder RM, Volavka J, Lachman HM, Grace AA (2004). The catechol-O-methyltransferase polymorphism: relations to the tonic-phasic dopamine hypothesis and neuropsychiatric phenotypes. Neuropsychopharmacology 29: 1943–1961.
Butter CM (1969). Perseveration in extinction and in discrimination reversal tasks following selective frontal ablations in Macaca mulatta. Physiol Behav 4: 163–171.
Campbell UC, Rodefer JS, Carroll ME (1999). Effects of dopamine receptor antagonists (D1 and D2) on the demand for smoked cocaine base in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 144: 381–388.
Clarke HF, Dalley JW, Crofts HS, Robbins TW, Roberts AC (2004). Cognitive inflexibility after prefrontal serotonin depletion. Science 304: 878–880.
Clarke HF, Walker SC, Dalley JW, Robbins TW, Roberts AC (2007). Cognitive inflexibility after prefrontal serotonin depletion is behaviorally and neurochemically selective. Cereb Cortex 17: 18–27.
Collins P, Wilkinson LS, Everitt BJ, Robbins TW, Roberts AC (2000). The effect of dopamine depletion from the caudate nucleus of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) on tests of prefrontal cognitive function. Behav Neurosci 114: 3–17.
Cools R, Altamirano L, D'Esposito M (2006). Reversal learning in Parkinson's disease depends on medication status and outcome valence. Neuropsychologia 44: 1663–1673.
Cools R, Clark L, Owen AM, Robbins TW (2002). Defining the neural mechanisms of probabilistic reversal learning using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 22: 4563–4567.
Cooper JC, Bloom FE, Roth RH (2003). The Biochemical Basis of Neuropharmacology, 8th edn. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Crider A (1997). Perseveration in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 23: 63–74.
Crofts HS, Dalley JW, Collins P, Van Denderen JC, Everitt BJ, Robbins TW et al (2001). Differential effects of 6-OHDA lesions of the frontal cortex and caudate nucleus on the ability to acquire an attentional set. Cereb Cortex 11: 1015–1026.
Dias R, Robbins TW, Roberts AC (1996). Primate analogue of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: effects of excitotoxic lesions of the prefrontal cortex in the marmoset. Behav Neurosci 110: 872–886.
Durstewitz D, Seamans JK (2002). The computational role of dopamine D1 receptors in working memory. Neural Netw 15: 561–572.
Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (2005). Neural systems of reinforcement for drug addiction: from actions to habits to compulsion. Nat Neurosci 8: 1481–1489.
Eyny YS, Horvitz JC (2003). Opposing roles of D1 and D2 receptors in appetitive conditioning. J Neurosci 23: 1584–1587.
Ferry AT, Lu XC, Price JL (2000). Effects of excitotoxic lesions in the ventral striatopallidal–thalamocortical pathway on odor reversal learning: inability to extinguish an incorrect response. Exp Brain Res 131: 320–335.
Fillmore MT, Rush CR (2006). Polydrug abusers display impaired discrimination-reversal learning in a model of behavioural control. J Psychopharmacol 20: 24–32.
Floresco SB, Magyar O, Ghods-Sharifi S, Vexelman C, Tse MT (2006). Multiple dopamine receptor subtypes in the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat regulate set-shifting. Neuropsychopharmacology 31: 297–309.
Frank MJ, Claus ED (2006). Anatomy of a decision: striato-orbitofrontal interactions in reinforcement learning, decision making, and reversal. Psychol Rev 113: 300–326.
Granon S, Passetti F, Thomas KL, Dalley JW, Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (2000). Enhanced and impaired attentional performance after infusion of D1 dopaminergic receptor agents into rat prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 20: 1208–1215.
Itami S, Uno H (2002). Orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder revealed by reversal and extinction tasks. Neuroreport 13: 2453–2457.
Iversen SD, Mishkin M (1970). Perseverative interference in monkeys following selective lesions of the inferior prefrontal convexity. Exp Brain Res 11: 376–386.
Izquierdo A, Suda RK, Murray EA (2004). Bilateral orbital prefrontal cortex lesions in rhesus monkeys disrupt choices guided by both reward value and reward contingency. J Neurosci 24: 7540–7548.
Izquierdo A, Wiedholz LM, Millstein RA, Yang RJ, Bussey TJ, Saksida LM et al (2006). Genetic and dopaminergic modulation of reversal learning in a touchscreen-based operant procedure for mice. Behav Brain Res 171: 181–188.
Jentsch JD, Olausson P, De La Garza II R, Taylor JR (2002). Impairments of reversal learning and response perseveration after repeated, intermittent cocaine administrations to monkeys. Neuropsychopharmacology 26: 183–190.
Jentsch JD, Redmond Jr DE, Elsworth JD, Taylor JR, Youngren KD, Roth RH (1997). Enduring cognitive deficits and cortical dopamine dysfunction in monkeys after long-term administration of phencyclidine. Science 277: 953–955.
Jentsch JD, Taylor JR (1999). Impulsivity resulting from frontostriatal dysfunction in drug abuse: implications for the control of behavior by reward-related stimuli. Psychopharmacology 146: 373–390.
Kebabian JW, Calne DB (1979). Multiple receptors for dopamine. Nature 277: 93–96.
Kruzich PJ, Grandy DK (2004). Dopamine D2 receptors mediate two-odor discrimination and reversal learning in C57BL/6 mice. BMC Neurosci 5: 12.
Lyons DM, Lopez JM, Yang C, Schatzberg AF (2000). Stress-level cortisol treatment impairs inhibitory control of behavior in monkeys. J Neurosci 20: 7816–7821.
Mehta MA, Swainson R, Ogilvie AD, Sahakian J, Robbins TW (2001). Improved short-term spatial memory but impaired reversal learning following the dopamine D(2) agonist bromocriptine in human volunteers. Psychopharmacology 159: 10–20.
Monterosso JR, Aron AR, Cordova X, Xu J, London ED (2005). Deficits in response inhibition associated with chronic methamphetamine abuse. Drug Alcohol Depend 79: 273–277.
Murphy BL, Arnsten AF, Goldman-Rakic PS, Roth RH (1996). Increased dopamine turnover in the prefrontal cortex impairs spatial working memory performance in rats and monkeys. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 1325–1329.
Parkinson JA, Dalley JW, Cardinal RN, Bamford A, Fehnert B, Lachenal G et al (2002). Nucleus accumbens dopamine depletion impairs both acquisition and performance of appetitive Pavlovian approach behaviour: implications for mesoaccumbens dopamine function. Behav Brain Res 137: 149–163.
Ragozzino ME (2002). The effects of dopamine D(1) receptor blockade in the prelimbic-infralimbic areas on behavioral flexibility. Learn Mem 9: 18–28.
Ridley RM, Haystead TA, Baker HF (1981). An analysis of visual object reversal learning in the marmoset after amphetamine and haloperidol. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 14: 345–351.
Robinson TE, Berridge KC (2003). Addiction. Annu Rev Psychol 54: 25–53.
Rolls ET, Critchley HD, Mason R, Wakeman EA (1996). Orbitofrontal cortex neurons: role in olfactory and visual association learning. J Neurophysiol 75: 1970–1981.
Rosenkilde CE (1979). Functional heterogeneity of the prefrontal cortex in the monkey: a review. Behav Neural Biol 25: 301–345.
Sawaguchi T, Goldman-Rakic PS (1991). D1 dopamine receptors in prefrontal cortex: involvement in working memory. Science 251: 947–950.
Smith AG, Neill JC, Costall B (1999). The dopamine D3/D2 receptor agonist 7-OH-DPAT induces cognitive impairment in the marmoset. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 63: 201–211.
Taghzouti K, Louilot A, Herman JP, Le Moal M, Simon H (1985). Alternation behavior, spatial discrimination, and reversal disturbances following 6-hydroxydopamine lesions in the nucleus accumbens of the rat. Behav Neural Biol 44: 354–363.
Volkow ND, Chang L, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Ding YS, Sedler M et al (2001). Low level of brain dopamine D2 receptors in methamphetamine abusers: association with metabolism in the orbitofrontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry 158: 2015–2021.
Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Wang GJ, Hitzemann R, Logan J, Schlyer DJ et al (1993). Decreased dopamine D2 receptor availability is associated with reduced frontal metabolism in cocaine abusers. Synapse 14: 169–177.
Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Wolf AP, Schlyer D, Shiue CY, Alpert R et al (1990). Effects of chronic cocaine abuse on postsynaptic dopamine receptors. Am J Psychiatry 147: 719–724.
Von Huben SN, Davis SA, Lay CC, Katner SN, Crean RD, Taffe MA (2006). Differential contributions of dopaminergic D(1)- and D (2)-like receptors to cognitive function in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 188: 586–596.
Williams GV, Goldman-Rakic PS (1995). Modulation of memory fields by dopamine D1 receptors in prefrontal cortex. Nature 376: 572–575.
Williams SM, Goldman-Rakic PS (1993). Characterization of the dopaminergic innervation of the primate frontal cortex using a dopamine-specific antibody. Cereb Cortex 3: 199–222.
Williams SM, Goldman-Rakic PS (1998). Widespread origin of the primate mesofrontal dopamine system. Cereb Cortex 8: 321–345.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by PHS Grants MH077248 (to JDJ) and DA020598 (to BL), and by ONDCP Grant DABT63-00-C-1003 (to EDL). We also gratefully acknowledge the support from the UCLA Experimental Center for Cognitive Phenomics (RR020750 to R Bilder).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, B., Groman, S., London, E. et al. Dopamine D2/D3 Receptors Play a Specific Role in the Reversal of a Learned Visual Discrimination in Monkeys. Neuropsychopharmacol 32, 2125–2134 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1301337
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1301337
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Dorsal and ventral striatal dopamine D1 and D2 receptors differentially modulate distinct phases of serial visual reversal learning
Neuropsychopharmacology (2020)
-
The relationship between monoaminergic gene expression, learning, and optimism in red junglefowl chicks
Animal Cognition (2020)
-
Modulation of extrasynaptic GABAA alpha 5 receptors in the ventral hippocampus normalizes physiological and behavioral deficits in a circuit specific manner
Nature Communications (2019)
-
D2 receptors and cognitive flexibility in marmosets: tri-phasic dose–response effects of intra-striatal quinpirole on serial reversal performance
Neuropsychopharmacology (2019)
-
Dopamine D2-like receptor stimulation blocks negative feedback in visual and spatial reversal learning in the rat: behavioural and computational evidence
Psychopharmacology (2019)
