Abstract
MAY I make a mild protest against the rather derogatory remarks about local lists of animals in the notice of Bolam's “Birds of Northumberland” in NATURE of December 3 (p. 841)? Natural history studies have made great progress in recent years by the methods practised by Mr. Nicholson, Mr. Elton and others, which find expression in the excellent new Journal of Animal Ecology. But because the new is very good, it does not follow that the old is bad: the two are surely complementary.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BOYCOTT, A. Local Lists of Animals. Nature 131, 94–95 (1933). https://doi.org/10.1038/131094c0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/131094c0
